Why nobody should support Herman Cain

NasaJoe · Oct 10, 2011

Herman Cain | Campaign Scandal | The Atlanta Post

Herman Cain's Enron-esque Disaster | Mother Jones

According to five lawsuits filed in federal court in 2004, Aquila's board of directors-which Cain joined in 1992-allegedly steered employees into heavily investing their retirement savings in company stock. At the same time, the company shifted its business model from straightforward energy generation to risky energy trading, an unregulated market made infamous by now-defunct Enron. The suits, later folded into a single, massive class action (PDF), alleged that Cain and top company officials violated a 37-year-old federal law requiring that employers manage employees retirement programs responsibly. (Cain's presidential exploratory committee did not respond to a request for comment.)

Founded in 1917 as Green Light and Power, Aquila traditionally made its money operating electric and gas plants and selling the energy they produced. In the years after Cain joined the board, Aquila's earnings climbed, from $254 million in 1995 to $351 million in 1998. Then, in early 1999, the company's leadership decided running power plants wasn't lucrative enough; energy trading and speculation had grown popular, and as the class suit lays out, Aquila wanted a piece of the action.

It was a dangerous move-as a company spokesman later put it, "the risk was huge." In the end, it proved disastrous. Aquila's decision to join Enron, Reliant Energy, and the other heavy-hitters in the energy trading markets would ultimately wipe out 94 percent of Aquila's stock value between 1999 and 2004. The company also faced criticism for using some of the same trading tricks that Enron did as a way to puff up its stock price, the lawsuit says. That included using "roundtrip" trades, a scheme in which Aquila would sell a trading partner some energy and then that partner would sell the same amount back to Aquila, a deal that canceled itself out. In the end, nothing actually changed hands. But it boosted Aquila's trading volume and revenue, sending a positive signal to the markets. The company also engaged in megawatt laundering, or "ricochet" trading, the lawsuit alleges. In such transactions, Aquila and other companies would buy energy from California at a lower capped price, move that energy out of the state, then re-sell it back to California at a higher price for a tidy profit.

But this financial trickery couldn't save a listing ship. In 2002, Aquila teetered on the brink of collapse. And for Aquila's employees, the result of the company's foray into energy trading was devastating: The company's employee retirement fund, overseen by the board of directors, lost more than $200 million in 2002. The reason: At the same time Aquila's executives and directors were investing more and more in highly risky energy speculation, they were selling their employees on the conservative nature of Aquila and pushing them to invest their retirement savings in company stock.
Click to expand...

Not sure if this is old news or not, to me it was news so I will share it. How can people be taking this guy seriously?

Norma Stits · Oct 10, 2011

NasaJoe said:

Not sure if this is old news or not, to me it was news so I will share it. How can people be taking this guy seriously?
Click to expand...

people are taking him seriously because FOX and the radio talk shows are all saying that he's the man..
now he's leading in the latest polls..

the mitt romney and perry people jumped on the cain bandwagon the second hannity and beck told them to.

i hate the word sheeple..

but SHEEPLE!

xmaspoo · Oct 10, 2011

It didn't take long to tear down Perry, Cain will fall from grace in due time.

gloppypop · Oct 10, 2011

He also doesn't think the Fed should be audited, called the housing bubble a "fairytale" weeks before it happened, has been supportive of the Iraq invasion and is an interventionist, said the Patriot Act was "90% right on", etc...

TheDankery · Oct 10, 2011

I don't think anyone is really taking Herman Cain seriously. Not even Herman Cain.

This guy also suggested that tougher drug laws may be the answer to "winning" the "War on Drugs", which is an insane approach to an insane "war".

noviceGrower420 · Oct 10, 2011

Hermboy probably wishes he would have been subservient to the liberal agenda so he would have gotten support from the black community. Pro minority and pro feminist (liberals), unless you vote other then democrat.

Footbag · Oct 10, 2011

Nine nine nine baby

Norma Stits · Oct 11, 2011

Footbag said:

Nine nine nine baby
Click to expand...

what's 999 upside down?

don't vote for him!!

Forums

Why nobody should support Herman Cain

NasaJoe Life is sacred

Norma Stits Guest

xmaspoo Bronze member
Gold Member

gloppypop give in or cave in
Old School

TheDankery Registered User

noviceGrower420 Banned

Footbag ┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌&#874
Gold Member

Norma Stits Guest

Share This Page

Network

Forums

Help

Find Us On

Useful Searches

Why nobody should support Herman Cain

NasaJoe Life is sacred

Norma Stits Guest

xmaspoo Bronze member Gold Member

gloppypop give in or cave in Old School

TheDankery Registered User

noviceGrower420 Banned

Footbag &#9484;&#8745;&#9488;(&#9699;_&#9698;)&#9484;&#874 Gold Member

Norma Stits Guest

Share This Page

xmaspoo Bronze member
Gold Member

gloppypop give in or cave in
Old School

Footbag ┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌&#874
Gold Member