Did anyone else think 3D was crap? ( they only aired it in 3d for the premiere) I dont usualy see movies in 3D so I can't really compare but I really think I would have enjoyed it more without it. There isnt many things really popping out of the screen, it seem all it did was give a illusion of depth. But at what cost? only the front of the screen is in focus the rest is all blurry...
I liked it. They didnt over do it. Thats why 3D usually sucks. They try to make everything 3D, but they used it much more subtly in this, and it just made it look 1000X better
For real? no j/k, ofc I was wearing the glasses LOL. I dont know, maybe im crazy or simply a problem with my vision perhaps
Ok I was wondering for a second. Idk, it may be the theater, it may be you. It was never out of focus for me
it was badass but a bit sad with all the deaths n it bein the end. i heard rumors of prequel(s). im curious as to how true to the book the movies were, last one i read was prisoner of azkaban/first part of goblet of fire edit: just read the last 3 chapters including the epilogue. i have to say i would rather they used it instead of what they did but w/e
i got it online, i havent read a physical book or a whole one at all for like 5 yrs i think. i need to get back into it but the scenery im in is stale n unmotivating. plus we dont have a bus system here
i saw it last night. they FINALLY did a good job!!! this was hands down the best harry potter movie! and they stayed pretty close to the book from what i remember
i was completely stoned and thought it was of course amazing. Alan Rickman as Snape is always good and especially his death scene with the flashbacks was fucking awesome.
sadly yes, much like every other movie they changed stuff around. tbh though I thought this movie was one of the best in that regard, the things they did change were pretty minor. although I will say the final showdown between harry and voldemort/aftermath were a little anti climactic for me.