Duality

Discussion in 'Philosophy' started by bkadoctaj, Feb 22, 2009.

  1. #1 bkadoctaj, Feb 22, 2009
    Who's more dual: you or me?
     
  2. #2 YEM, Feb 22, 2009
    Who is to say that we are dual?
     
  3. #3 bkadoctaj, Feb 22, 2009

    Who is to say we aren't (without exhibiting duality)?
     
  4. #4 YEM, Feb 22, 2009
    Who is to say one is more dual than the other?
    The point of being dual is balance, not imbalance.
     
  5. #5 bkadoctaj, Feb 22, 2009

    Balance and imbalance illustrate duality.

    Not and not not illustrate duality.
     
  6. #6 Tee 8sh See, Feb 22, 2009
    I dual wield Glock 9s.

    You are packing no heat.

    Therefore, I win.
     
  7. #7 bkadoctaj, Feb 22, 2009
    You have lost your humanity, therefore you illusorily compete.

    I would never use guns, I don't compete.
     
  8. #8 Tee 8sh See, Feb 22, 2009
    So, hold on...I lose?
     
  9. #9 GhostLunch, Feb 22, 2009

    excellent reply!!!!:hello:
     
  10. #10 bkadoctaj, Feb 22, 2009

    Oh, there's that hidden duality you tried to obscure.

    Win and lose dualize.
     
  11. #11 YEM, Feb 22, 2009
    One more shot at this:
    Yin is no more dual than yang.
    Yang is no more dual than yin.

    Together they create balance, seperatley they create imbalance.
    Seperatley, they focus on balancing themselves.

    One can only balance oneself through solitude.
     
  12. #12 bkadoctaj, Feb 22, 2009

    Solitude contrasts with interconnectedness, which is the way it is, as compared with how it is not.
     
  13. #13 TommyCrossbones, Feb 22, 2009

    My dichotomy suffer from dichotomies of their own.

    So yes.
     
  14. #14 bkadoctaj, Feb 22, 2009
    Look: when it comes right down to it, are you dichotomous or not?

    ;)
     

Share This Page