Playboy Magazine will not be publishing nudes anymore. For an old guy, this is interesting. I remember in the late '50s up until (?) they would show bare breasts but NOT nipples, then they showed bare tits, then pussies. In my lifetime they have come full circle. Especially since the internet became widespread, seeing naked women is not a big deal anymore. And it is certainly true that a scantily-clad woman can be much sexier to look at than a completely naked woman.
What Playboy doesn't understand is that it's very existence offends these SJW Progressive types, and that no amount of contrition or pandering will appease them, it just makes them smell blood. Case in point http://www.dazeddigital.com/artsandculture/article... According to this article, being sexually attracted to a 20 year old woman is pedophilia. Seriously, according to these people their issue isn't with naked women, their problem is with men looking at them.
I didn't check the link, but it sounds like radical feminism to me. They are just mad cuz men don't look at them -- most of whom are ugly. So they use the force of government to change things -- like all leftists do.
This is somewhat old news. I guess I will continue my 20 year streak of not even seeing a playboy mag They're making 60fps porn now
I hear you on the scantily clad woman being more alluring than a spread eagled, pussy in your face image. I tell you if I knew what was underneath the clothes of some of the yokes i have disrobed over the years i wouldn't have gone near half of them. I love Playboy, Hustler, Penthouse and my particular favorite UK Housewives. You cannot beat a wank sitting on the toilet grasping a porn mag in your free hand. Heaven. Typed in the cockpit of a runaway Boeing
I kinda liked looking at young perky nipples. I also was really into seeing those girls who had shapely protruding pubic bones especially. Playboy made it's mark being big female breast oriented. I never was a tit man myself though. But it was the only nudey mag I read and I did like their liberal bent in the articles. But unless they really impress, I will not be renewing my subscription. I really enjoyed looking at the beautiful naked female form. And read and bought their rag for years. Too bad.
True, they got boring quick but a few hours later they would become interesting again for some reason. I kinda liked that cover of the new Playboy with a scantily clad youngster in the link Blazed posted. Maybe better than the nudes.
I truly do NOT understand people who still buy porn these days. What. The. fuck? Most of us can even get laid for free, that's a thing ya know!
Hmm, so does that mean scantily clad women sell better, or? I don't get how reverting back to no nudity would help?
Like a wrapped present has more appeal than an unwrapped one, an almost naked lady has more appeal than a nude one. Or maybe the illusion of innocence like the girl on the new Playboy cover makes us want to see more and maybe that would lure some into buying the magazine? Nothing like ravishing innocence, eh? A while back we were discussing where porn goes from here, what could be more explicit than modern porn. Maybe this is it. A reset back to the 1950s when Fizzly was a teen.
Actually, you could be right. We're at like, the event horizon of porn. It can't get any more extreme than it already is. Or at least, it's unfathomable how it could haha.
Yeah, a guy can only be turned on by watching ladies shoot milk out there asses so many times. Before wanting to watch them shoot chocolate pudding. Oh shit. I bet that's been done too.
I don't read them either, but I do know they are very popular because they show good-looking young women -- but they are NOT naked.
I have a perv over them when I visit the local shop. Prefer the UK housewives with saggy tits though. Typed in the cockpit of a runaway Boeing