I'm Glad the posts on this forum have been informative for you. Anyways, if the U.S Followed the Constitution....we wouldn't be in the mess we are in today. No Federal Reserve. Yes To Gold. No Policing The World No Wars, No Lies. If we followed the Constitution Ron Paul Would be in Power. The U.S will pass the TPP and Cement the Collapse that is to come... Whenever there's a Mass Shooting like Charleston, Sandy Hook ect they always attack the 2ND amendment. Its our last right. NDAA being passed on midnight, new years day.... Where are you from? If you don't mind me asking
UK mate. So you think the laws you have in place just now are adequate? Not a dig btw. Genuinely interested
Actually I just poked a bunch of holes in it. You don't infringe on the rights of millions to protect a few dozen. I think you're overestimating the power of legislation.
they make holes in people naaaahhhhfiijnsrgiopjnasrgio you're missing the point nobody's trying to ban guns, just regulate them cars are dangerous. so you must be licensed to operate one
When I was a kid I watched a lot of West stuff on tv. I had a fuck off Indian outfit, headdress and all. Not muched has changed since those days imo. America has been born, bred and fed on guns. It's too late the horse has well and truly bolted at this stage. Americans are armed to the teeth. Prescription drugs are a much bigger problem in the US than guns from what i can see. More weed, less pills would be my election slogan.
so do knives Do you know what self defense is? Practically speaking self defense is impossible if you cannot threaten your aggressor with superior force. In almost all cases, this means no less than personal firearms <blockquote class='ipsBlockquote' > naaaahhhhfiijnsrgiopjnasrgio you're missing the point nobody's trying to ban guns, just regulate them cars are dangerous. so you must be licensed to operate one </blockquote> Rights are taken away through small seemingly reasonable regulations over time and effectively become outright bans -yuri
how is it not a fair comparison? The concept is the same. You don't feel safe with people having weapons. How many kids do you think would be killed if a dude with a machete attacked a school? Less then guns? Probly not -yuri Its the principle of the matter "You aren't allowed to defend yourself because I'm afraid of you" -yuri
a knfie can be used as a weapon, as can many other things. but there's only one gun again I'm not against right to arms, just saying there should be requirements to meet gun laws wouldn't decrease violence but it's the principle of the matter
the principal of the matter? You are trying to regulate self defense out of fear. Regulations pile up over time. What you consider a reasonable regulation now, will one day be history. And the new liberals.of the future will want even more "reasonable" regulations. Conclusion. Logically speaking there is no such thing as sensible gun regulation -yuri
to create order in a crazy world and an atmosphere of civility im guilty of what I accused Hillary Clinton of earlier - "progress without progress", ill give u tht but I still do believe tht something as dangerous as a gun, although serves its purpose, shouldn't be viewed as an everyday tool
right but that's just your opinion. Self defense is part of your right to life. You don't have the right to infringe on my rights just because you are afraid of me -yuri
I have no problem with my neighbor owning weapons. an armory on the other hand... then u got the human factor. ppl fight all the time, everywhere. it would suck if someone died from a testosterone clash
so ban computers. How many psychopathic hackers have destroyed lives buisness and economies? Its still the principle of the matter You are literally punishing innocents for potential crimes of others -yuri