Would you smoke weed even if it did cause lung cancer?

No. i would vaporize

 

Simple answer. I smoke cigs.

 

Like guaranteed you will get cancer? if so, depends how long it would take.

 

If it was the same risk as cigs and there was no vaporizing or eating then I probably would considering I smoke cigs.

 

Vape and edibles ftw

 

if were comparing it to the same damage as cigarettes? yup.

 

[quote name='"thunderfunk"']Simple answer. I smoke cigs.[/quote]

My thoughts exactly.
I'd probably smoke just weed without cigs in a world where Mary Jane is malignant..

 

should your lungs get fucked up way faster cause you hold that shit in tho?

 

If I could, I'd vape. But if I can't vape or make edibles then I still would, just not nearly as often. Like only for actual special occasions.

 

I smoke cigarettes, I drink, and I dabble in other things. That should answer your question

 

It's sort of a no brainer, I mean your smoking burnt plant material. I think that alone will elevate everyone's risks. It just shows how fucking stupid people are, walking around, thinking they're all healthy because they smoke weed.

 

Inhaling hot smoke into your lungs isn't very good for your health, regardless of what's in the bowl/paper.

 

Smoking weed isn't exactly roses on the lungs.

But if it were, hypothetically, as harmful as cigarettes? I'd still smoke, though I'd probably toke a lot less.

 

I really don't know... Kinda scary just thinking about it

 

I already smoke cigs, i wouldnt care.

 

I smoke cigarettes, so, yes. Yes I would

 

Man I'd be so fucked already...

 

I would just vaporize it

 

well I smoke cigs so ya