They would like to create confusion, such as your effort,but they do not like it when I post strategy for lawful and peaceful revolution urging Article V. A) Can you understand and accept that the root purpose of free speech is to assure information vital to survival is shared and understood? B) Can you accept that purpose of free speech as prime constitutional intent? C) Can you accept that EVERY American can understand and accept A)? D) Are you aware that in 1911, 2/3 of the states applied for a convention and congress violated the law, their oath and the constitution by failing to convene delegates? http://m.firedoglake.com/firedoglake/#!/entry/16-responses-to-congress-needs-to-comply-with-state-demands,540762b9e56d0bb85366887f Can you accept that such a fact justifies that all delegates are elected in the states by the people of the states? E) Can you understand that any state legislator that cannot accept A), can be impeached in this constitutional emergency as being unfit for office? F)Can you understand and accept that A) B) C) D) & E) are legal process and that IF citizens D) for justification, and E) to complete the legal process they WILL be "the rightful masters of the congress and the courts" BECAUSE their states, as the people, then will agree that proper preparation for Article V consists of; 1) Ending the abridging of free speech 2) Securing the vote 3) Campaign finance reform G) And such preparation by amendment is completely constitutional and can only enable democratic assertion of the principles of the republic once complete; WHEREUPON all amendment ceases until America can assure it is competent to Article V by testing itself to assure it knows and can define constitutional intent?
See "delusions of grandeur" No. The root purpose of the first amendment is to assure people aren't persecuted for beliefs. It is to ensure people can freely SHARE information if they CHOSE. The first amendment is NOT a right to knowledge. You have no sovereign right to the knowledge other people have learned. No No Yes I am well aware Wut?! I think you need to rewrite that. You literally said this "Are you aware that in 1911, 2/3 of the states applied for a convention and congress violated the law, their oath and the constitution by failing to convene delegates?" Then said that this ^^^^^ ""justifies" that all delegates are elected in the states by the people of the states?" You realise this makes no sense in the English language right? I don't even know what you meant to say that's how ffar off it is. Please rephrase this so I can understand No because there was no violation if free speach LOL. No Sent from my LG-E739 using Grasscity Forum mobile app
That would be a war. "An armed rebellion". I mean, seriously. Mincing words at this point is just absurd. For political reasons, they don't want to use the word "war". Whoever gets to decide who the belligerents are, according to your definition, determines if it's a war or not. Our drone strikes meet the definitions of "war" from duhaime.org and Cornell Law, and arguably the arming of others does as well. We're reinventing the wheel here by even discussing it.
Russia is economically weak, like he said. There's not much you can do in that state of affairs. They have some military might, but in any prolonged conflict with major players they'd get hammered really quickly. Their economy is about the size of Italy's. They really aren't the badasses they portray themselves as.
But they have a secret weapon. Its called Marxism. And it spreads through Democratic society like a.virus. once the enemy is destabilized it doesn't matter how weak Russia is Sent from my LG-E739 using Grasscity Forum mobile app
they are not. I didn't say they were. I meant to say that they spread.Marxist ideals in order to destabilize nations. America uses bombs..Russia uses propaganda Russia is too poor for bombs Sent from my LG-E739 using Grasscity Forum mobile app
See the constitution, Article V, . But you like things the way they are so have no plan and do not like plans based in law that America can accept, if free speech could serve its purpose, which it cannot.
Marxism is self-defeating, although they're not really socialist at this point anyway. Maybe ideologically. That doesn't really matter though. The United States and Russia both understand that if Russia were to engage in any conflict with a world superpower, the fight would be really quick. It's game theory, essentially.
yes Marxism is self defeating. That's the point. Kids don't know that. Sent from my LG-E739 using Grasscity Forum mobile app
How about you do something about it instead of bitching behind a screen. I've lived and worked in DC, met with staffers, discussed legislation, and made an effort to affect change (in real time). Get back to me when you've done something productive. People who get shit done don't have the time to get kicked off several forums.
Your opinion is based on the fact that you believe what Russia is telling the world on how they are doing. Putin himself has been stockpiling cash in his own bank account, and who is to say he doesnt have a huge stockpile of warfunds while giving his people crumbs. Yall keep calling Russia poor, but the only proof of that we have now a days is Russia's on word.
Two things are certain. Yuri is not accountable AND your position is one of vigilance and readiness without assumption.
Seeing there is not a defined state as a belligerent with legal or territorial protections and recognition under any international charter. It is clearly not an act of war. Even Syria is accepting the deals behind closed doors. No more a war than when raiding a terrorist compound in the desert with hostages or one planning to attack. See how easy that is when you educate yourself. Ignorance sucks, thanks for demanding better!
Yes, because the UN disallows "war" except in self-defense, we have to define ourselves as non-belligerents and then we get to call it something else. Pretty trivial if you ask me.
This may be the reason PNAC spoke of a "Pearl Harbor" type events years before 911. To justify support for such attacks with sophisticated weapons of war, without declaring war.