Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Disclosure:

The statements in this forum have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration and are generated by non-professional writers. Any products described are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.

Website Disclosure:

This forum contains general information about diet, health and nutrition. The information is not advice and is not a substitute for advice from a healthcare professional.

Water absorbs THC???!?

Discussion in 'Apprentice Marijuana Consumption' started by sackagonj12, Aug 28, 2008.

Page 2 of 2
  1. #21 Tuk2, Aug 30, 2008
    Ill take a water filtered hit over a dry hit every single time, even if it means 1/2 of a hit less at the end of a session. It only filters out a negligible amount.
     
  2. #22 Lebowski, Aug 31, 2008
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 31, 2008
    WATER DOES NOT ABSORB THC AND THC IS NOT WATER SOLUBLE.

    What happens is the cooling causes THC to condense and fall out of the air/smoke.

    You are right in concluding that using water removes some of the THC, but the THC does not get absorbed by the water. When the THC floating around near the water cools enough, it falls, literally, and resinates the side of the bong or it sits on top of the water.


    And it happens in


    You can get higher using less weed, but taking more smaller hits with a dry bong. With a wet bong you can get higher by using a little more weed and taking it in one giant hit.
     
  3. #23 ACDCrocker, Aug 31, 2008
    Geez, finally someone that knows what they're talking about. Ignorance is going to (and already is) ruin this world...please research things before you go spreading rumors.
     
  4. #24 What'sThatSmell, Aug 31, 2008
    Yeah know what?
    If you drink bong water you get fucked like you would off an edible.
    TRY IT.
     
  5. #25 kssmeimaprate26, Aug 31, 2008
    THC is hydrophobic. It IS NOT water soluble. Im not sure about the other CBNs but it would still be an incredibly insignificant amount.
     
  6. #26 spaceman46&2, Aug 31, 2008
    You need to read what the OP wrote and then read what you wrote. You made a completely incorrect conclusion because of your inability to correctly interpret what the OP quite clearly stated.
     
Page 2 of 2

Share This Page