Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Disclosure:

The statements in this forum have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration and are generated by non-professional writers. Any products described are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.

Website Disclosure:

This forum contains general information about diet, health and nutrition. The information is not advice and is not a substitute for advice from a healthcare professional.

Vaping hold vs. smoking hold

Discussion in 'Apprentice Marijuana Consumption' started by 2e3t4y5u, Mar 13, 2012.

Page 2 of 2
  1. #21 TokesandJokes, Mar 14, 2012
    It confused me slightly at first but I ended up having a good laugh. :p
     
  2. #22 Heosphoros, Mar 14, 2012
    Sorry haha. Just meant THC/CBD/other Cannabinoids
     
  3. #23 TokesandJokes, Mar 14, 2012
    No need to be sorry, that was like the best part of my day so far haha. I thank you for that, sir.
     
  4. #24 NutsLikeKngKong, Mar 14, 2012
    your lungs absorb stuff pretty damn quick

    besides, you can do damage to your lungs by taking big breaths and holding them in.. even with just air
     
  5. #25 Heosphoros, Mar 14, 2012
    [quote name='"NutsLikeKngKong"']your lungs absorb stuff pretty damn quick

    besides, you can do damage to your lungs by taking big breaths and holding them in.. even with just air[/quote]

    Better not tell that to swimmers...

    You won't do damage to your lungs like that..
     
  6. #26 True Serenity, Mar 14, 2012
    You should hold smoke for no more or less than 5 seconds. This has been "proven" by some folks in Australia. About 95 % of the THC will have been "absorbed" or whatever, so anymore than that would simply allow tar and other toxic substances to be absorbed as well.

    As for a vapor hit, you can hold it as long as you'd like. It does get you higher-- how much higher, I don't know. Since there was no combustion, there's no tar etc. So why not hold it for a 'lil while? :smoke:
     
  7. #27 NutsLikeKngKong, Mar 14, 2012

    granny says it better than I'll ever be able to...


     
  8. #28 Heosphoros, Mar 14, 2012
    All of those dealt with smoke, not air or vapor.

    So again...better not tell swimmers holding their breath hurts their lungs.
     
  9. #29 2e3t4y5u, Mar 14, 2012

    yeah but thats smoke, were talkin bout vapes now.
     
  10. #30 2e3t4y5u, Mar 14, 2012

    haha i gave you rep for that, that was to funny
     
  11. #31 NutsLikeKngKong, Mar 14, 2012
    It doesn't matter.


    should I not tell them they're more likely to develop bullous lung disease?
     
  12. #32 Heosphoros, Mar 14, 2012
    [quote name='"NutsLikeKngKong"']

    It doesn't matter.

    should I not tell them they're more likely to develop bullous lung disease?[/quote]

    You think it doesn't matter whether you hold your breath with smoke or air? Are you being serious? All of those studies show the effect of smoke. Smoke has tar, carbon monoxide, and carcinogens. These things MIGHT make some sort of difference?

    They aren't more likely at all, holding your breath isn't going to kill you...

    I love granny and she's pretty much always right, but by posting her links without understanding them you're just spreading misinformation.
     
  13. #33 InTuneGP, Mar 14, 2012
    I take that as meaning filling up your lungs to 100% capacity (be it air, smoke, vapor, or a mix) causes the damage...extreme pressure for extended time...but who knows, I may be wrong.
     
  14. #34 2e3t4y5u, Mar 15, 2012
    So the idea is to ghost it until you don't see any vapor?
     
  15. #35 Heosphoros, Mar 15, 2012
    [quote name='"n00bslayer06"']So the idea is to ghost it until you don't see any vapor?[/quote]

    I think the idea is to at least get close enough to ghosting it that you're comfortable with it. I see a little vapor when I play with it, but I try to keep large quantities in my lungs.
     
  16. #36 Phisherman, Mar 16, 2012

    Agreed, was very funny.:smoke:
     
Page 2 of 2

Share This Page