1. Last day to win a Pax2 Vaporizer! Subscribe on YouTube to be entered to win a PAX 2 Vaporizer! Winner will be announced Sept 1
    Dismiss Notice

U. S Troops ordered to kill Americans who don't turn in guns.

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Ganja04Twenty, Jul 26, 2012.

  1. #1 Ganja04Twenty, Jul 26, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 26, 2012
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHNh4WLk138&feature=youtube_gdata_player[/ame]

    Discuss.

    Paul Joseph Watson Infowars.com Monday, July 16, 2012

    The UN Arms Trade Treaty that has been identified by observers as a flagrant threat to the second amendment and which Barack Obama is determined to sign has its roots in a 1961 State Department memorandum which explains how the United Nations will oversee “complete disarmament” of the American people under the ruse of preventing war.

    The UN Arms Treaty has caused so much controversy because it outlines a plan to target “all types of conventional weapons, notably including small arms and light weapons,” according to Forbes’ Larry Bell.

    Former US Ambassador to the UN John Bolton also warns that the agreement “is trying to act as though this is really just a treaty about international arms trade between nation states, but there is no doubt that the real agenda here is domestic firearms control.”

    A letter sent last month by 130 Republican House members to President Obama argued that the treaty should be rejected because it infringes on the “fundamental, individual right to keep and bear arms”. The letter adds that “…the U.N.’s actions to date indicate that the ATT is likely to pose significant threats to our national security, foreign policy, and economic interests as well as our constitutional rights.”

    Using the rhetoric of the threat post by terrorists, insurgents and “international crime syndicates,” the UN is busy trying to imply that all weapons are somehow involved in illegal activity on a global scale and should therefore be controlled and regulated by a global authority.

    This is precisely the same language used in a 1961 U.S. State Department briefing which outlined a long term agenda to carry out a “Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World.”

    Invoking the threat of nuclear warfare, the document spells out a plan to create a “United Nations Peace Force” that would “enforce the peace as the disarmament process proceeds.”

    While the document initially focuses on scrapping nuclear weapons, it later makes it clear that the only groups allowed to own weapons of any kind would be governing authorities, “for the purpose of maintaining internal order,” and the UN “peacekeeping” force itself, which would require “agreed manpower.”

    “The manufacture of armaments would be prohibited except for those of agreed types and quantities to be used by the U.N. Peace Force and those required to maintain internal order. All other armaments would be destroyed or converted to peaceful purposes,” states the document.

    While the memorandum outlines a broader mandate to destroy national sovereignty, eviscerate national armies and institute the UN as the planet’s supreme authority with a world army, the document serves as a stark reminder that the plan for the United Nations to oversee the abolition of the second amendment has been in the works for decades.

    As Bell points out in his Forbes article, the threat of the Obama administration relying on a UN treaty to do what successive administrations have tried but failed to accomplish – taking a huge bite out of the second amendment – is by no means far fetched.

    After all, a plethora of UN treaties and international agreements have already stripped the United States of its sovereignty and its power to decide its own laws. The power to authorize U.S. involvement in wars and conflicts has now been almost completely stripped from Congress and handed to the United Nations.

    Following Barack Obama’s arrogant rebuff of Congress in seeking approval to strike Libya, during which he churlishly remarked, “I don’t even have to get to the Constitutional question,” Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta affirmed that the U.S. now requires “international permission” before deciding on its military policy.

    Other Obama-endorsed UN power grabs like the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) as well as Agenda 21 and sustainable development are also serving to decimate national sovereignty and remain almost completely under the radar.

    You only need to look at the European Union, which now crafts around 50 per cent of the laws made in member states like Britain, to understand how unelected global institutions can and have dictated policy on a national level.

    The UN Arms Trade Treaty presents an existential threat to the guns rights of American citizens and should be rejected for what it is – yet another attempt by the Obama administration, in the aftermath of the Fast and Furious scandal, to abolish the second amendment by stealth.
     
  2. fuck the government, i cant wait until we fucking rebel.
     
  3. Disarming the American public will not help in preventing war as long as the government keeps starting them.
     
  4. haha isn't the whole reason we can bear arms is to protect yourself from the government or some shit? haha all I know is me and my buddys will go down shooting
     
  5. I tried to learn piano once.
     
  6. [quote name='"Mister Meaner"']I tried to learn piano once.[/quote]

    try the saxophone dude.
     
  7. semi auto shotty in my closet along with a .357 magnum and a 9mm along with a .300 rifle and a .45 colt. ill go down shootin
     
  8. [quote name='"livinlifebro"']semi auto shotty in my closet along with a .357 magnum and a 9mm along with a .300 rifle and a .45 colt. ill go down shootin[/quote]

    Yo, let me have some of those. I don't have shit brah :p
     
  9. They can pry my gun from my cold dead hand. And I dont even have a gun.
     

  10. Start collecting sharp rocks. Also consider poop on a stick.

    Also. Nobody is taking anyones guns.

    Also, Gun talk not allowed on GC
     
  11. I don't really care about gun control, personally. There's always a peaceful way to go about things. Not everything needs a gun.
     

  12. context often allows it...most often in a POLITICAL based thread such as this.:rolleyes:
     
  13. but hunters gotta hunt ya know...

    [​IMG]:p
     
  14. Honestly.... if the policemen are any real Americans, they wont do shit.
     
  15. Lol.
    Good luck finding all the ones in my neighborhood with the numbers scratched off.
    Could literally melt them all and make a fleet of tanks in this city.
     
  16. Im so glad I live in Texas.;):cool:
     
  17. not my words but i agree

    You have to go about is smartly.Buy some cheep guns. Maybe 5. Have them in a gun case that will be easy access for them. Make sure there are lots of rounds Those are the ones you will give up. Act very upset that they are taking them and ask how you will defend yourself. Make sure you real guns are unfindable. Maybe a refrigerator with a built in gun storage in the back. Don't tell your friends because even friend will rat you out to save their bacon!
     

  18. they try to take our guns we'll just secceed *sp*
     

  19. oh ya thats working great for the Chinese didnt they get murdered with tanks?

    oh and you people thinking the soldiers will say no..i seriously doubt it the military isnt stupid the re write you to act and to not question orders trust me they will follow orders they always do..
     
Loading...

Share This Page