U.S. Boots On The Ground In Libya, Pentagon Confirms | Fox News Fox news must have good connections, eh? Anyways: We can all safely assume their identity is being protected because the terrorists'll get 'em... Or create explosives to blow the shit out of Gadhafi's forces. Bullshit. The U.S. Ambassador to Libya just confirmed LIVE on Fox News that their mission is to take out Gadhafi and has been in the past as well. He also confirmed that there has been British, French, and American "Forces" on the ground. Lotta fishy stuff coming out from under the wire. Tell me whatchu think about this.
They said there was al-queda fighting on the front lines with the rebels against Gadahfi? I read that somewhere from a news station.. us troops ... al queda, re-unite on libyan soil
I am sure Gadaffi had an enemies list a little longer than your average blade; and the country is probably crawling with merc's with orders to kill him. Let's see who get's him first.
I simply have a very hard time believing that we have FOUR troops over there... FOUR individual people? What a bunch of shit... Lies...
What if the rebels fail and Ghaddafi stays in power. I can see this happening and we will be fucked. We will either walk away in disgrace or escalate it by taking him out ourselves with boots on the ground. And he isn't going to be happy and will be more powerful than before imo because he successfully defied the U.S. and Nato.
4 troops! HA I'd say we've had MANY more than 4 troops for a hell of a lot longer then we'll ever know. Good ol' SOCOM.
yeah well there are many interests and not just for the US, Libya has a lot of gold for a little amount of people, lots of resources too, he wanted to only accept gold for the oil, which would be negative for the euro and the dollar, we had to be "humanitarians" and save the thousands of people being tortured and killed by the regime. i think that since this is the "age of information" things are coming out a lot quicker than they did for every other military conflict we've been involved in where it's fishy. i also think our CIA and other nations intelligent agencies could of easily orchestrated "rebels" to overthrow ghadafi, wether it was with a salary, mind-control in a lab, propoganda, promises, or they simply created them to do it...or they did one of the above to a few people who gathered up the rebels. The leader of the rebels was an al-queada, he was caught by CIA and tortured, then redinitioned to Libya to be tortured and questioned for terrorism and other things, then he is free, and all the sudden he is the leader of the rebels overthrowing Ghadafi. there's just a lot to be skeptical about. Libyan commander demands apology over MI6 and CIA plot | World news | The Guardian [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GuqZfaj34nc[/ame] we did the same to Sadam http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,998512,00.html
The more important questions is, who is commanding these troops? Obama seems quite happy to pass control of US troops to foreign commanders. My opinions on this subject are tantamount to treason, so I'll leave it at that.
Why is that such a big deal to you Americans? The US army expect to have 'coalition partners' troops at the disposal of your senior commanders. Why the double standards?
You are obviously not a student of American History. It is against the constitution.. .you know, that dusty old relic that we druggies are always trying to hide behind? Why do people in Japan refuse to manufacture nuclear bombs?
Nope, you're right, I'm not a student of American history. Thankfully left all that behind at the age of 14 with the JFK murder and Vietnam. Thanks for the answer anyhow.
Nah, no worries. American history is a dismal tale... even when it's told honestly, which is rarity... particularly in America....