The Pyramid Code

Discussion in 'Science and Nature' started by Hank Scorpio, Nov 12, 2010.

  1. #1 Hank Scorpio, Nov 12, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 12, 2010
    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rlSssnh4b7Q]YouTube - The Pyramid Code Part 1-25.mp4[/ame]

    Very interesting documentary. Find the rest http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=The+Pyramid+Code&aq=f
     
  2. Thank you so much for this. +rep fo sho
     
  3. #3 MelT, Nov 12, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 12, 2010
    Before or after anyone watches the above they should read the following:

    http://forum.grasscity.com/science-nature/693875-pyramid-myths-answered.html

    The movie above is to promote the 'work' of woo-woo authors such as Hancock and Bauval. Although you might think that the maker of the movie, someone from the Uni' of Calgary would be a scientific type, it seems not. She believes that:

    "...There has been plenty of speculation over the years. However, I am of
    the opinion that it is the temple of the goddess itself and the high
    level initiations that gave the initiates the ability to perform magic
    that is 'the records'. I allude to a lot of it in The Pyramid Code and I
    speak about the sidhis, or abilities, in many of my archived interviews.
    The sidhis involved the transmutation of the atom and were: telepathy, manifestation,
    levitation (anti-gravity), bilocation, teleportation, and alchemy. How
    the initiates were able to be trained in such a way to accomplish this,
    to me, is the mystery, the pearl, the secret. The 'Halls' that they did
    this in is, in fact, beneath and below and in front of the left paw of
    the Sphinx..."

    This another conspiracy theory post that should not be in 'science'.

    MelT
     
  4. but there's a code MeIT!!!! A CODE!!!!!!!!!!! :eek: lol
     
  5. Damnit...if we only knew the answer!!!!:)

    What she writes about a lot is the idea that there's a hidden space beneath the Sphinx. Although it's an old rumour, she bases this mainly on what Hancockand Bauval have told her:

    "... In their book The Message of the Sphinx, Graham Hancock and Robert Bauval report on the use of modern technology to investigate the ground surrounding the Sphinx:
    In 1973-4 . . . the first in a series of serious pioneering projects was launched, using ground-penetrating radar and other high-tech remote sensing equipment to locate "anomalies" under the bedrock beneath the Sphinx. These projects were channeled through well-established academic institutions - the Ain Shams University in Cairo and the prestigious Stanford Research Institute (SRI) in the USA.


    In 1977 the US National Science Foundation funded a project at Giza again involving the SRI. This time use was made of several new techniques such as resistivity measurements (from metal rods driven into the rock across which an electric current was passed), magnetometry, and also the latest aerial photography and thermal infrared image-enhancing techniques.



    According to the SRI team's official report: "Several anomalies were observed as a result of our resistivity survey at the Sphinx ... Behind the rear paws (north-west end) we ran two traverses. Both traverses indicate an anomaly that could possibly be due to a tunnel aligned north-west to south-east ..." Two other anomalies were noted, deep in the bedrock "in front of the paws of the Sphinx." [p. 90-91]
    Hancock and Bauval quote SRI geophysicist Lambert Dolphin, who relayed to me a rather different conclusion in a personal correspondence:
    Lambert Dolphin: "...Next we drilled 4 inch bore holes on the anomalies and inspected the hole with downhole TV. Nothing was found except small cracks. We paid special attention to the front paws, and under the paws. No chambers!

    "...I saw the TV program claiming a chamber had been discovered by electronic means but in the absence of published data I am skeptical. The bedrock floor around the Sphinx, and in front, shows no evidence of having been tunnelled or disturbed. In places it is weak and of poorer grade. Yes, there are small cracks. The Sphinx itself, cavities, and surrounds were very thoroughly explored and documented subsequently by Mark Lehner now of U. of Chicago. He does outstanding work.


    Deep shaft tombs just up the Chephren Causeway from the Sphinx have standing water in them nowdays. This means the water table is not many feet below the base of the Sphinx. In ancient times a canal from the River Nile apparently came right up to the base of the Giza complex, so if there were a chamber under the Sphinx it would be full of water. (This would have been an even more striking resistivity anomaly for us in 1978).


    I do not believe there are any chambers under the Sphinx at this point in time.


    The work of Schoch and West on the Sphinx is highly flawed. For one thing they ignored the severe local atmospheric industrial pollution in the last century which has severely damaged the Giza monuments and fast, too. This is well known by the Egyptologists. I won't get in to that story, you probably are up to date on their work and the many thorough refutations from well-qualified people.


    sincerely,
    Lambert Dolphin..."

    Read his full letter here: Lambert Dolphin Letter




    Now, why on earth should respected authors Hancock and Bauval choose to lie about such a thing?:rolleyes:


    MelT

     
  6. So i figured this is relivent to many of the posts lately ;p

    Crackpot Index

    my fav. one:

    "25 points for each evidential mention of Atlantis, Mu, Lemuria, or the 1995 film Stargate."

    or

    "30 points for insisting that if critics cannot disprove a theory, then it must of necessity be true."
     
  7. LOL!!! A very good read, thanks for posting:)

    MelT
     

Share This Page