The Global Warming fraud & the phony statistics that support it

Discussion in 'Pandora's Box' started by 1badbruce, Aug 12, 2012.

  1. Global Warming? Yeah, Right

    by JAMES DELINGPOLE August 10, 2012 st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }
    Have a look at this chart. It tells you pretty much all you need to know about the much-anticipated scoop by Anthony Watts of Watts Up With That?
    What it means, in a nutshell, is that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) - the US government body in charge of America's temperature record, has systematically exaggerated the extent of late 20th century global warming. In fact, it has doubled it.
    Is this a case of deliberate fraud by Warmist scientists hell bent on keeping their funding gravy train rolling? Well, after what we saw in Climategate anything is possible. (I mean it's not like NOAA is run by hard-left eco activists, is it?) But I think more likely it is a case of confirmation bias. The Warmists who comprise the climate scientist establishment spend so much time communicating with other warmists and so little time paying attention to the views of dissenting scientists such as Henrik Svensmark - or Fred Singer or Richard Lindzen or indeed Anthony Watts - that it simply hasn't occurred to them that their temperature records need adjusting downwards not upwards.
    What Watts has conclusively demonstrated is that most of the weather stations in the US are so poorly sited that their temperature data is unreliable. Around 90 per cent have had their temperature readings skewed by the Urban Heat Island effect. While he has suspected this for some time what he has been unable to do until his latest, landmark paper (co-authored with Evan Jones of New York, Stephen McIntyre of Toronto, Canada, and Dr. John R. Christy from the Department of Atmospheric Science, University of Alabama, Huntsville) is to put precise figures on the degree of distortion involved.
    For the full story go to Watts Up With That NOW!
    There is, of course, one very, very sad aspect to this story - and truly it pains me to mention it but journalistic duty compels me to do so - and that's the dampening effect it may have on the grandstanding of a hapless fellow by the name of Professor Richard Muller.
    Poor Professor Muller has been telling anyone who'll listen - his amen corner in greeny-lefty MSM, mainly - that as a former "skeptic" he has now been forced by weight of evidence to conclude that global warming is definitely man-made and there has been lots of it (a whole 1.5 degrees C - Wow! that's like almost as much as you'd get if you drove from London to Manchester!!!) since 1750. Tragically - as Watts has very reluctantly and by-no-means-experiencing-any-kind-of-Schadenfreude had to point out is that the data used by Muller to draw these conclusions was unreliable to the point of utter uselessness.
    So, in the spirit of magnanimity in total crushing victory I would urge readers of this blog not to crow too much about the devastating blow Watts's findings will have on the Guardian's battalion of environment correspondents, on the New York Times, on NOAA, on Al Gore, on the Prince of Wales, on the Royal Society, on Professor Muller, or on any of the other rent-seekers, grant-grubbers, eco-loons, crony capitalists, junk scientists, UN apparatchiks, EU technocrats, hideous porcine blobsters, demented squawking parrots, life-free loser trolls, paid CACC-amites and True Believers in the Great Global Warming Religion.
    That would be plain wrong.
    James Delingpole is a British writer, journalist and broadcaster who is (he says) right about everything. He is the author of numerous fantastically entertaining books including Welcome to Obamaland: I've Seen Your Future and it Doesn't Work. His website is James Delingpole - Official Website and he also has a blog at the Daily Telegraph.

    Read more: Family Security Matters Family Security Matters
    Under Creative Commons License: Attribution

  2. I dont care if its real or not. Even if it is real its not like theres anything I can do about it.
  3. 1badbruce your ontop of your shit lol
  4. #4 1badbruce, Aug 12, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 12, 2012

    What :eek: you can't vote?

    Well if it is fraud which I do believe, we're (you, I & the rest of the taxpayers) going to be paying for it to the tune of hundred of billons of dollars in government programs & new regulations while guys like Al Gore get fat.

  5. Id can vote, but how would that help?
  6. #6 1badbruce, Aug 13, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 13, 2012
    When environmental issues & canididates come to ballot vote them down.
    In the 60's & 70's I believed in environmental causes. What the environmentalists have done to this country over the last 45 years is unconscionable.
    They're literally destroying America.

Share This Page