So I was just thinking about what scientist claim they have known for a long time without any god-like evidence to prove such a thing in a theoretical model of limitations. Lets assume that all energy/matter (whatever you want to call it in essence) existed forever, it has been here and always been here. Thus it resides in all of infinite space, because we must accept that space is infinite, or elsewise it wouldn't be space, it would be filled with matter. So in such a case we have to assume that matter exists EVERYWHERE, because how could it just exist in some parts of all of empty space? What dictates this magical amount of matter? And obviously the one force that governs how it moves in the universe is gravity. Assuming such a case then, it is easy to supply the fact that all of the matter in the entire universe would pull on eachother into an equilibrium of motionlessness, otherwise considered osmosis. Now lets assume that YOU ARE GOD and you can go back in time infintiely and view the events that occur within all of infinite space and time, what do you see? Well you keep going back in time forever and you will always witness a first of something, so effectively there was never any first of anything, there was no first human, no first tree, and certainly no first bouncy ball, because as far back as you can go in time you will always see a new first bouncy ball. So lets fucking assume now the alternative case, which seems equally if not more unbelievable, and that is that matter is created randomly in the universe, spawning out of absolute empty nothingness. The implication here is that YOU ARE GOD again, and you go back in time and what the fuck do you see? You see an infinite duration where nothing remains in the universe forever and ever, this duration in our existance can be called "Never." And in this case, obviously there is a beginning. I don't know how the hell it happens, but YOU ARE GOD so you can figure this out for yourself too.