Stefan Molyneux appreciation thread

Discussion in 'Politics' started by m00zix, Mar 16, 2012.

  1. "Our technology is moving far faster than our morality which means that technology is being forever pumped and served into the hands of the most evil amung us which is why so much of what government does is possible because of technology. If our goddamn ethics does not speed up to keep up with our technological growth we will end up in a night of hyper controlled technological fascism for which there will be no dawn, no end, no awakening. The gorgeous potential and wonderful voluntary tapestry of the human mind, of the human condidtion, the human society will be burned and buried and dead and turned to ashes pecked only by the crows of The fascist amung us." - Stefan Molyneux


    Nice little end to that six parter
     
  2. More in depth on the "against me argument".


    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UD_1nbahAts"]"How to Win Political Arguments" Stefan Molyneux from Freedomain Radio Speaks in New Hampshire - YouTube[/ame]
     
  3. This video features Jeffrey Tucker. It starts cooking at around 15 minutes...although the part about "tourist traps" is quite insightful/entertaining. I know this is the Stefan Molyneux appreciation thread so hate me if you want.

    Jeffrey Tucker remarking about 'Power and the Market' by Murray Rothbard:
    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIUsE3Er2xE]Power versus the Market | Jeffrey A. Tucker - YouTube[/ame]
     
  4. Pretty good watch if you have the time.

    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqkqPz6w2UE]Should Libertarians Abandon Politics? A Debate between Stefan Molyneux and Ernest Hancock - YouTube[/ame]
     
  5. The documentary is almost finished. Awesome.

    Here is the 11min teaser

    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0uK_AyKg0W0]Truth: The Freedomain Radio Documentary - Teaser - YouTube[/ame]
     
  6. I would love to see Stephan go head to (empty) head in a debate with Obama. I dont believe he would even dignify Obama with a debate though since Obama clearly loves sticking guns in peoples faces:cool:
     
  7. I am not sure if they'd allow that. I am actually surprised they allowed Lee Doren in a google hangout with Obama. If Molyneux went on, he'd have "connection issues"
     

  8. Minds would be blown.
     
  9. To hell with the Google hangout. I want Stefan and Hussain face to face, eye to eye, on stage on national prime time TV... Hey, a man can dream:rolleyes:
     
  10. [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_k93op7_Pc]"How Much Government Is Necessary?" - Part 1 of the Debate - YouTube[/ame]

    Minarchism vs Ancap debate with Michael Badnarik, 2004 Libertarian Presidential Candidate
     
  11. I'm so impressed by this man. Since I found this thread yesterday I've been hooked on his youtube channel.

    He's a beautiful voice of reason in a world of insane people.
     
  12. [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNtyV0CXfzU]The Myth of Scandinavian Socialism - YouTube[/ame]
     
  13. Very informative to say the least.

    Definitely some good fire power against the kiddies who want to be like Sweden.
     
  14. http://www.strike-the-root.com/72/molyneux/molyneux4.html

    I transcribed "A handout for statist" in spanish and I'm going to print it out and hand it to a bunch of lazy mexicans.


    Yo: Dime, ¿Crees que la violencia está mal?

    Estatista: Si, la violencia está mal, excepto en defensa propia.


    Damn those estatistas
     
  15. [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRo0q3-yxRA]Stefan Molyneux of Freedomain Radio Talks in New York! - YouTube[/ame]
     
  16. Needs to be watched lol

    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UvbHJGS6Fds]SCG Debates Stefan Molyneux: Justice for Profit? - YouTube[/ame]
     
  17. #99 Arteezy, Apr 24, 2013
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 24, 2013
    I'm like 20 minutes in and this guy is a terrible debater... There's no focused topic yet.

    Waste of time. Watched the last 10 minutes. He calls Stefan a liar based on hearsay.
     
  18. Haha i just wanted to show stefan rage. He has annoying points such as why would you pay for defense?

    eh? Who cares? What is the argument for? I can see why he refused to debate larken.
     

Share This Page