Something to ponder.

Discussion in 'Science and Nature' started by Swizwalz, Mar 27, 2009.

  1. Near the end this just gets a little stupid even to me and it doesn't make that much sense, but try to read slow and analyze it. Oh and I use the word "existence" a lot.
    Oh and I also don't believe the Big Bang theory, just to let you know.

    The big bang is defined as the rapid cooling, heating, and subsequent explosion/rapid expansion of a star which created the Universe.
    The Universe is defined as everything we can ever know - time, space, everything that is.
    The Universe is time and space and time and space is the Universe.
    If the big bang created the Universe, time and space and everything else that defines the Universe wasn't in existence before the big bang, but during the big bang the star started out smaller than an atom and then expanded to the size of a football. So how could the big bang occupy something that it eventually created and that wasn't in existence yet? Time was required for the coolinlg, heating, and explosion, and the star itself occupied space. First less than the size of an atom and then the size of a football.
    How could the big bang create everything including the big bang itself?
    If the big bang created the Universe where was this space that the star occupied? Nothingness? Parallel dimensions? Do they exist?
    Can something which is already in existence create the very existence of aforementioned existence?

    How could the big bang create something which it was already comprised of?
    If time and space existed before the big bang where and how did the big bang come into existence and then create the very existence that we know of?
    Were any catalysts involved in the process of the big bang? Did something set off the cycle of existence? Can a set of circumstances or catalysts similar to what possibly created the creation of existence end the existence of everything including what existed before existence came into being? If time and space existed before everything else an abrupt end to existence would have no effect on time or space and thus the end to existence would not be possible becuase nothing that is can just cease to exist without the prescence of time. Time must pass for this existence to end, to go from existence to non-existence. Whether it be the smallest amount of time or the largest. Has our very existence been on the course of ending since the creation of that very existence? If time and space came first how did time and space come into existence?
    If time must pass for anything to cease to exist then something other than time must have existed during the formation or creation of time, unless time has always been and will always be but what has no beginning cannot possibly be measured from beginning to end, so if time has no beginning can it have an end or not? If time did cease to exist what would be left? The very idea of time constitutes a start to everything and an eventual end to everything, but if time has always existed then it is not time it is just infinitely endless existence. But existence is measured in a period of time.

    Could black holes end all existence? Black holes destroy everything including the very time and space they occupy which means they would destroy their very existence. Do black holes apply to the laws of time and space, do white holes have to exist wherever black holes exist? Could black holes be comprised of and apply to the unkown circumstances which created time itself. Did anything exist before time? If time has no beginning nothing could have existed before time because it would be considered "time." If black holes suck in and destroy everything including existence and their own existence could white holes spray existence back into a new existence in an entirely different place. Could all existence be on large cycle of recycled existence with black and white holes acting as doorways to separate existences? When a door closes another one opens. Will existence ever end or is existence's purpose simply to continue to exist in another place. Could our very existence be the remnants or products of a previous existence? If time has no beginning existence which is a period of time also has no beginning so existence will always be whether here,there, or in some medium which has not been discovered yet. If something exists where nothing else not even time exists, does that original thing even exist? If a tree falls in a forest with no one around to hear it does it make a sound?

    Could the big bang be the remains and subsequent beginnings of a past existence, and a new one? Something had to create matter such as that first star when there was nothing else. So if nothing else existed during the beginnings of our existence did the beginning of our existence even take place? Could the big bang have been the temporary end of a previous existence as opposed to a beginning? Could we be living in an existence that is not our own? If existence cannot end except temporarily has our existence ended already multiiple times since the beginning. If existence can end would anything be left after? Would that thing even truly exist with no other existence. Could everything we know the be the end of a much much much larger existence?
     
  2. Something to ponder indeed.
     
  3. The Big Bang didn't start from a star. It was a tiny point of energy. Check into the multiverse and parallel universes. It has gained a lot of scientific attention recently. Scientific American sent me a great little pamphlet on it.


    It might shed light on to your understanding of the big bang theory and how the universe (may have) began.




    Ponder that!
     
  4. I have information that says it started out as a very tiny very hot star that cooled expanded and then exploded. It's from a book lol.
     
  5. This might help.

    Evidence for the Big Bang

    I am certainly not convinced that everything had a beginning, though perhaps our universe did....
     

Share This Page