Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Politics' started by OGKushBlazer, May 2, 2011.
But really, why does it matter? They were both pretty messed up people that were responsible for the deaths of thousands and thousands of people.
In my opinion, Bin laden because he attacked america
Hussein was mostly in his own country.
who cares, they're both dead.
I don't think it really matters but my mom asked me, I didn't know, so I came to the City.
Okay, good answer. Thanks.
A lieing government ?
The CIA and every other organization/group making this planet a bigger hell hole then it needs to be.
Wow. You serious?
Saddam had more influence and power and a longer reign of terror....so Saddam by far, Osama was a religious zealot with a severe case of being a sociopath. Saddam straight up mustard gassed his own people.....
who gives a fuck they are both in hell.
Bush Sr. & Jr.
I'm glad you place priorities on human life based on the color of your skin or nationality.
Bin Laden was worse.
Despite what the U.S. govt likes to say about Saddam, he was
no terrorist. And during his reign, women in Iraq had the highest
literacy and education rates in the Middle East.
Under Saddams Hussein's reign, Iraq enjoyed prosperity.
Iraq was mostly a secular country when Saddam was in
power, so education, and wealth was not a problem
in the country at the time.
The U.S. likes to use propaganda to make him look bad.
Sure Saddam was no saint, he killed his own people,
but he was not worse than many other tyrants
in the world.
Exactly, you are supposed to care for your population, not kill them. It wouldn't have mattered if he had only been in power for a month, you don't kill the people that look up to you to care for them.
Bin laden, no question. The celebrations and outpouring of expresioin, after his death was announced, speaks volumes about the hatred that this man managed to earn for himself.
Um, Saddam committed genocide brah. Al-Anfal campaign.
Unethical Freedom Fighter Genocidal Maniac