1. Dismiss Notice
  2. Dismiss Notice
Update About Advertising on Grasscity Important: A New Chapter for Grasscity

rosie o donnel takes a stand for 9/11 truth

Discussion in 'General' started by weedzilla420, Mar 17, 2007.

Page 1 of 2
  1. #1 weedzilla420, Mar 17, 2007
    http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/odonnell_stands_911_truth.htm

    It has been evident for a number of weeks now that talk show host Rosie O'Donnell has been trying to cover 9/11 truth in the best way she can without being yanked off the air - now her latest blog posting confirms this.

    In her latest blog, dated March 15th, O'Donnell dispenses with the small talk and gets to the nub of the matter by stating some of the facts surrounding the demolition of building 7 on 9/11.

    Here is the Blog entry in full:

    at 5 30 pm
    9 11 2001
    wtc7 collapsed

    for the third time in history
    fire brought down a steel building
    reducing it to rubble

    hold on folks
    here we go

    • The fires in WTC 7 were not evenly distributed, so a perfect collapse was impossible.
    • Silverstein said to the fire department commander “the smartest thing to do is pull it.”
    • Firefighters withdrawing from the area stated the building was going to “blow up”.
    • The roof of WTC 7 visibly crumbled and the building collapsed perfectly into its footprint.
    • Molten steel and partially evaporated steel members were found in the debris.

    [WTC 7] contained offices of the FBI, Department of Defense, IRS (which contained prodigious amounts of corporate tax fraud, including Enron's), US Secret Service, Securities & Exchange Commission (with more stock fraud records), and Citibank's Salomon Smith Barney, the Mayor's Office of Emergency Management and many other financial institutions. [Online Journal]

    The SEC has not quantified the number of active cases in which substantial files were destroyed [by the collapse of WTC 7]. Reuters news service and the Los Angeles Times published reports estimating them at 3,000 to 4,000. They include the agency's major inquiry into the manner in which investment banks divvied up hot shares of initial public offerings during the high-tech boom. …”Ongoing investigations at the New York SEC will be dramatically affected because so much of their work is paper-intensive,” said Max Berger of New York's Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann. “This is a disaster for these cases.” [New York Lawyer]

    Citigroup says some information that the committee is seeking [about WorldCom] was destroyed in the Sept. 11 terror attack on the World Trade Center. Salomon had offices in 7 World Trade Center, one of the buildings that collapsed in the aftermath of the attack. The bank says that back-up tapes of corporate emails from September 1998 through December 2000 were stored at the building and destroyed in the attack. [TheStreet]

    Inside [WTC 7 was] the US Secret Service's largest field office with more than 200 employees. …”All the evidence that we stored at 7 World Trade, in all our cases, went down with the building,” according to US Secret Service Special Agent David Curran. [TechTV]

    lets start here
    ok…go slow
    remember 2 breathe
    use google

    Clearly anticipating a huge response, O'Donnell has suspended the comments form on the post.

    O'Donnell's day time ABC chat show, The View first came to the attention of the 9/11 truth community last December when actor James Brolin, the husband of Barbara Streisand, encouraged viewers of the show to check out the website 911weknow.com , which purports to expose how the twin towers and Building 7, which wasn't hit by a plane, were brought down via controlled demolition.

    The show then came to our attention again last month when O'Donnell and a panel discussed John Conner of the Resistance Manifesto. At this time O'Donnell mimicked Conner by shouting "9/11 was an inside job" in front of her mainstream audience.

    On the panel at that time was The "Grey Gardens" star Christine Ebersole, who declared her admiration for Conner. Ebersole then appeared on John Conner's radio show (MP3) and stated that she agreed a corrupt faction within the U.S. government is to blame for 9/11.

    "I think we want to look at our government as sort of like a benevolent father that's going to take care of us and be kind to us and treat us well, and I think it's too much for our people to conceptualize, and I'm sure that's what happened to people in Nazi Germany," Ebersole commented.

    The New York Post immediately blasted Ebersole as a "kook".

    O'Donnell was again in the news today after she covered the "confession" of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, questioning it's authenticity. The Huffington Post commented:

    "...it's very difficult to assert anything with certainty right now. But it's a little disquieting to listen to the laugher of the View audience and they try to figure out what they should be cheering for and what should bother them."

    Indeed, it seems that O'Donnell has woken up to 9/11 truth only to find herself in a situation where her audience are not really 'typical' truth seekers, which is entirely a good thing. It therefore comes as no surprise to see Rosie O'Donnell making a more forceful attempt to educate her readers at this time.

    It is important to stress that celebrity sound bites do not make a revolution, but it is important to remember that people such as O'Donnell have an avenue to reach a lot of people. It is down to the discretion of her viewers to decide whether to look into what she is saying.

    While many have praised her, some vicious bloggers have already labeled O'Donnell as a lunatic and an anti-semite and are calling for her head, no doubt the mainstream media will pick up on this as they usually do, two days later than everyone else.

    Watch this space.


    here is her website where you can find the entry. she has also posted a link for 9/11 scholars for truth.
    http://www.rosie.com/
     
  2. #2 Liquidtruth, Mar 17, 2007
    I find it funny that some people have a hard time accepting these inconsistencies and instead rely upon the "official" version of the 9/11 events. YOU ARE BEING LIED TO. It is obvious, painfully obvious, and yet it doesn't seem to interfer with anyone's ability to watch American Idol... So I guess it must not be important.
     
  3. #3 weedzilla420, Mar 17, 2007
    i think rosie is probably the most mainstream celeb to speak up about this.
     
  4. #4 JollyRoger227, Mar 17, 2007
    I was actually watching the view when she was talking about it but one of the other lady's on there is like a hardcore bush worshipper, so she always stops talking about it. I'm glad Rosie runs her big mouth about it, someone should
     
  5. #5 Rasta_Man, Mar 17, 2007
    What about Sheen?



    Haha this is exactly what the 9/11 Truth Movement needs... Rosie O'Donnell :rolleyes:
     
  6. #6 chronictoker, Mar 17, 2007
    hahaha...idk about 9/11 truth, I think it may be an oxymoron, but all I know is

    "power is the ability to define reality [and have other people respond to your. definition as if it were their own]" - Wade Nobles

    from the start, somebody's been trying to define my reality for me...

    to be honest I was excited when the planes hit not terrified, don't know why that was just my reaction adrenaline pumping ya know, I had no idea what to think about it until later when teachers at my high school were trying to tell me what to think...and on the news.
     
  7. #7 sh4d0ws, Mar 17, 2007
    Search up google for "BBC wtc 7" or something...youtube has a video where a bbc reporter broadcasting live at 4:57PM EST in manhattan is saying that the WTC 7 tower has collapsed, and talks about it for nearly 20 minutes...behind her, in the live background you can physically see the WTC 7still standing while she has stated it's already collapsed. Mysteriously 5 minutes before the actual collapse of the building (at 5:20PM EST) the live feed of the reporter cuts out.

    Anywho I am not a crazy conspiracy theorist, in fact I think that all that occured because the feed behind the reporter of manhattan and the buildings wasn't actually live, and its behind actual time, so it looks like BBC had prior information of the collapse of the building


    EDIT: Here's the link http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2007/280207timestamp.htm
     
  8. #8 What'sThatSmell, Mar 17, 2007
  9. #9 DirtyPete, Mar 17, 2007

    My sentiments exactly.
     
  10. #10 flower_child, Mar 18, 2007
    This reminds me of a quote that went something like

    "No matter what side of an argument you're on, there's always someone on your side that you wish was on the other."
     
  11. #11 ledfut, Mar 18, 2007
    watch the cnn version. it runs about 40 min before the bbc and the reporter catches himself as he says the building has collapsed and he sees it over his shoulder and then tries to smoothly transition.
     
  12. #12 My Fax, Mar 18, 2007
    As I said before, I wish aliens would just invade us already so we'd stop fighting each other.
     
  13. #13 weedzilla420, Mar 19, 2007
    it seems to me the movement keeps getting bigger. i am confident that it will not just go away. ron paul and dennis kucinich (both in congress) have promised there will be investigations.
    i just hate to see the day when main stream america finally opens their eyes and realizes what happened and what their government did. it will be caotic.
     
  14. #14 Crackajacks, Mar 19, 2007
    Am i the only one that thinks the terroist actually did do it? All of the "inconstistences" i have heard about like, "it wasnt hot enough to melt the steel, cell phones dont work on planes, some guy said a missle hit the pentagon" have all been refuted. The steel was weakened by the heat, those people used the plane phones, and the sound bite was taken out of context.

    I understand people say the american government did it so we could invade the middle east and get oil but i cant see the logic behind that. The 9/11 attacks where a huge hit on the american economy and it gave us the excuse to do what? Invade Afganistan? Also who would honestly be up for this idea, politicans and government officials are people too. As for the government being some all powerful evil machine that has the power to cover up a major attack that would take 1000s of people to corridinate and not speak up? Nixon couldnt cover up the fact that he had some dudes put microphones in the Democratic HQ but now Bush can cover up one of the worst foreign attacks ever on American soil that would take the corridantion of 1000's of people? I just cant see it.
     
  15. #15 Livingalife, Mar 19, 2007
    http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=8e1_1173720912
    http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=3ee_1172878327
    All you really need to know. I don't really like the videos besides some of alex jone's personally they try to make stupid things. Really I like the evidence such as they shipped all the rummage of the buildings to China and didn't let inspections for bodies and possible bombs and also things like a New Yorker can't posses a blueprint of the WTC towers to see if a hit by a plane really could of knocked it over. All a hoax to control the opium heroin trade in Afghanistan and economic oil profits in Iraq. Really come on why would we fight for Iraq. Trying to occupy it and get that $$$$$$$ Look at Bush's career a oil and gas business owner and Cheney the chief executive officer of Halliburton. Ever seen the war profiteers? Also if you think its a mistake the executive branch of the government received warnings from Russia and Germany and a couple other countries that something is going to happen soon. Anyway America fucked up too. We re-elected Bush for a second term. :(
     
  16. #16 bonez, Mar 19, 2007

    well I think a lot of people just cant see building 7, a steel framed building, collapse into its footprint exactly like the other towers just happened to do and pass it off as coincidence
     
  17. #17 Rasta_Man, Mar 19, 2007
    Alright, Well I want to make on thing clear first off. I am in NO WAY advocating this 9-11 truth B.S.

    But I think there is probably cause, and I think that the means are entirely there.



    First off, is we have to remember that the U.S. is a country which has staged numerous terrorist attacks, and coup d'etats in it's history. They are MORE than capable of pulling something off without the general public being the wiser.

    Only several dozen people even have to be aware of this, in order for it to be perpetrated. People with no desire to speak up, people with huge incentive not to.



    Secondly, is I think that the American's interests in the middle east go beyond simple oil and military contracts. (disregarding whatever you may or may not believe about 9-11). We're talking about the long-term militarization of a region, which imperiums before the U.S. have tried for centuries to tame in the name of conquest, in the name of resources and riches, and in the name of sheer power. A region with nearly a billion individuals who have for thousands of years defied all attempts at western colonization and the values of capitalism.

    I believe the interests in the region are tied directly to globalism. Globalism cannot be achieved with the middle east in the state it is now.



    This is just an idea, I'm not stating some conspiratorial fact. I'm sure I'll get torn into like I was though.
     
  18. #18 Tonyizzle, Mar 19, 2007
    Rosie reminds me of Tom Cruise. Somebody get this bitch a damn twinkie and shut her up..
     
  19. #19 Crackajacks, Mar 19, 2007
    Yes the U.S. has stage various coups but that only hurt the opposing side in that contry. Not like 9/11 where almost 3000 Americans died. Also we know about those coups and for the level of sophistication it would take to destroy the twin towers with plane hits and explosives would take many people. Planning it all would take at least hundreds of people and not just the upper level guys it would have to go to some lower downs to. I just dont see how there could be so much planning and so many people with no whisle blower on somthing this terrible. I dont know what terroist attacks we have staged.

    As for globalization i disagree. The middle east is the fuel of the world and us invading Iraq only creates instablity in the middle east which raises the price of oil. Im not familiar with why America would want to force globalizaiton on the middle east since the middle east is fairly modern (albeit with very consertative values). I dont see how we could militarize the region with our strected out mililtary or come up with an excuse to take over the acutal cash cows like saudi arabia or kuwait who publicly have good relations with us. In my opinion the reason we invaded Iraq was because Bush thought they were harboring terroists, were giving terriosts weapons, were making WMD's/nukes, and wanted to make an example out of them for the rest of the middle east to see. Well its hasnt worked out so well.

    I know you were just throwing ideas so im just responding to your statments. I know your not stating some conspiratorial facts.
     
  20. #20 Crackajacks, Mar 19, 2007

    According to Wiki some unexplained fires persumably from debris caused the diesel fuel stored there to blow up. I dont really see why they would go threw all the effort to blow up a building to cover some shit up. If they were getting rid of files or anything in that building i dont see why they would go threw the effort of blowing up the buildings. If they have the ability to blow up the builds for the whole world to see and not get caught couldnt they just go in to the building and destroy what every they wanted gone without the public every knowing? Why wouldnt do that?
     
Page 1 of 2

Share This Page