High as fuck right now, I literally shed a tear. [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BQDowv4wD8U]Ron Paul 2012: We the People Have the Power - YouTube[/ame]
Ron Paul never had a chance to win, won't have a chance to win, and won't win... This site has turned into one giant Ron Paul orgy Fucking hippies No reason to genralize and call names.. We are a peaceful bunch.. ~YODA
[quote name='"Pass the dr0"']Ron Paul never had a chance to win, won't have a chance to win, and won't win... This site has turned into one giant Ron Paul orgy Fucking hippies[/quote] Couldn't agree more. Not saying I'm against him... I actually like quite a lot of things he says, but DAMN, EVERYWHERE on the internet is sooo full of people on RP's dick. It's a lost cause. Was from the very start
Charlie mutha fuckin Chaplin! It looks like someone on the Ron Paul staff has been watching old Anonymous videos. [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9TG4RTwctlw]Anonymous to the Machine: You Will Rust and die from the blood of our hearts! - YouTube[/ame]
It doesn't matter if he doesn't win. The people who support Ron Paul, we don't support the man, we support the idea. The idea of freedom and the choice to do as we please without the fist of governmental barriers knocking down on our doorstep. You think that if he doesn't win, it ends with congressmen Ron Paul? You think the idea of freedom and individuality dies within a mere presidential election? The world has heard of him, the world has heard of his message, and that is all that matters. The old ways has failed, and history has proven this time and time again. Vote for him, don't vote for him, at the end, we have already won. The message is out there, it's crawling in every pixel of every word published in the internet, it's manifesting itself through the wires of telephones and intoxicating the vocals spewed from the mouth of man. The media has stopped him once, but not anymore. We want freedom, we want our individual rights back, for what is the purpose of humanity if we cannot express ourselves without the thought of governmental barriers blocking our potential?
you do realize its still fascism whether its the federal government or your state government right? the only thing that would change is a few states wont have to worry about the DEA while the rest of us are still fucked by state laws...
How is it fascism if its the federal government? isn't the purpose of the federal government directly opposite of fascism?
[quote name='"Jitros067"'] It doesn't matter if he doesn't win. The people who support Ron Paul, we don't support the man, we support the idea. The idea of freedom and the choice to do as we please without the fist of governmental barriers knocking down on our doorstep. You think that if he doesn't win, it ends with congressmen Ron Paul? You think the idea of freedom and individuality dies within a mere presidential election? The world has heard of him, the world has heard of his message, and that is all that matters. The old ways has failed, and history has proven this time and time again. Vote for him, don't vote for him, at the end, we have already won. The message is out there, it's crawling in every pixel of every word published in the internet, it's manifesting itself through the wires of telephones and intoxicating the vocals spewed from the mouth of man. The media has stopped him once, but not anymore. We want freedom, we want our individual rights back, for what is the purpose of humanity if we cannot express ourselves without the thought of governmental barriers blocking our potential?[/quote] Yes. Thank you.
Oh sure I've heard about the term "freedom". But there is a big difference between hearing about it and acting upon it. You find it hilarious, why? Everyone has heard of freedom, but the problem is that the main populace is forced to believe that their current social status is considered to be "free". They are deluded by the media, brainwashed by corporations to believe that despite all the troubles in the world, they are "free". Freedom doesn't mean anything until you understand what freedom truly means and what is at stake.
So you needed Ron Paul to act upon it? or else I don't see this "big difference" between hearing about it and acting upon it. You don't need to vote in a politician to express freedom, if you really feel like you do, you don't know what freedom is. It isn't like America is a dictatorship like Nazi Germany, so calm down.
So Obama signing an executive bill for the US government to full mandate US resources, that's not a form of dictatorship? 2020, over 30k+ drones are estimated to be launched to monitor and survey every move and conversations performed by innocent individuals, that is not a form of dictatorship? To mandate full control for an innocent individual? Patriot act, to convict any suspected individual of crime and treason, that is not a form if dictatorship? To avoid the legal justice system, to just convict those who are "suspected" with no evidence. 900+ bases in over 150 countries, THAT is not a form of dictatorship? Invading countries by ignoring the declaration of war simply to enforce your presence, how is this NOT a dictatorship? I was a big enough of a fool to allow myself to be brainwashed, to believe everything is fine the way it is. I didn't need Ron Paul to act upon it, I needed Ron Paul simply for motivation and inspiration. How can an individual be expected to take action when their source of inspiration is nowhere to be found? No, you don't need a politician to express freedom. You need an honest individual to take a big leap of faith, to inspire others to do the same.
How many presidential candidates have stood in front of the collective American population and dared to present the issues he has? Ron Paul isn't the start of freedom, but he is a focal point for questioning why so few Americans actually have it. That message has reached a lot of people, and continues to reach a lot of people. I have a feeling that we will all be hearing his quotes for some time to come. http://forum.grasscity.com/us-presidential-elections-2012/
Well one could argue that it is just for your country's defense, and the amount of terrorist attacks have dropped tremendously. Not that I agree with the way they gather intelligence, but every government has a form of gathering information by infringing "freedom".
For your countries defense? Tell me how this makes sense, enforcing your policy by not even declaring war, simply invading a country and lying to its people by stating you're there for "nuclear warheads". Get real, appointing yourself as the police of the world with no authority what so ever does not PROTECT your country. Why do you think outside of its borders EVERY SINGLE NATION HAS A POOR AND NEGATIVE OPINION ON THE STATES?
Well don't just blame the government for the worlds disdain of America. We find the actions of the citizens to be vile to. And, if you ran a country, would you not worry about a potential nuclear threat? If not, then don't argue politics anymore.
What a hypocritical question when you yourself are in possesion of weapons strong enough to blow up the world 20-25 times, yet you worry about another country possessing 1/100th of your nations military capabilities? If they don't pose a direct threat, don't give them a reason to by invading their country simply because they have warheads.
They are a threat, because they have warheads LOL Let's say a guy has a gun okay, and is standing outside of a pre-school, and he isn't a threat? If your son and or daughter went to that pre-school, would you let him stand there and drive away? And yes, America has warheads to, blah blah blah, I never said your country was any better then your enemies.
