I can already picture the uproar anti-cannabis people will make. This obviously means marijuana is directly linked to violenct episodes in users. Never mind about the adverse effects of alcohol, lets block focus on marijuana - the killer drug! Toke on and take care GC
\t\t"We found that people dependent on cannabis were more likely to commit violent crime - but to say our studies showed that cannabis itself caused violence is wrong" nuff said it always depends on the individual, and chances are that there will be traces of mj in their systems...why? because soooooooo many ppl smoke it. im not seething, not rly, i dont bend to propaganda, and am in a pretty forward facing state...we're looking at mmj here soon
" "We found it was not the substance that caused the violence, it was because heavy users were more likely to have a history of anti-social behaviour, bad parenting, failure at school, thieving and involvement in the illegal drug market. "It is not because of consumption, it's because of past history. "To say the paranoia created by smoking cannabis makes you more likely to be violent is a very big claim," she says, "there is no evidence for this." "
In the run up to the reclassification, Daily Mail readers were told that cannabis was to blame for: A vampire fantasist who drank the blood and ate the heart of his 90-year-old victim. A father smothering his baby son A teenager slaughtering a motorist while dressed as a samurai sword-wielding ninja A daughter bludgeoning her father to death with a poker Two crack addicted teenagers punching to death a baby and a mental patient strangling his former lover duh! crackheads! crack's already proved to cause anger and other problems that might lead to baby punching.
