Quit Smoking Cigarettes

Discussion in 'General' started by MR Budweiser, Oct 30, 2002.

  1. I cut this off the net some time ago, now I finally quit and want others to read it and know.

    So, you thought it was the tar that caused cancer...

    Think again. Cigarette companies will have you believing
    anything just as long as you continue to buy their products. The fact is, although insoluble tars are a contributing factor to the lung cancer danger present in today's cigarettes, the real danger is radioactivity. According to U.S. Surgeon General C. Everette Koop (on national television, 1990) radioactivity, not tar, accounts for at least 90% of all smoking related lung cancer.
    Tobacco crops grown in the United States are fertilized by law with phosphates rich in radium 226. In addition, many soils have a natural radium 226 content. Radium 226 breaks down into two long lived 'daughter' elements -- lead 210 and polonium 210. These radioactive particles become airborne, and attach themselves to the fine hairs on tobacco leaves.
    Studies have shown that lead 210 and polonium 210 deposits accumulate in the bodies of people exposed to cigarette smoke. Data collected in the late 1970's shows that smokers have three times as much of these elements in their lower lungs as non smokers. Smokers also show a greater accumulation of lead 210 and polonium 210 in their skeletons,though no studies have been conducted to link these deposits with bone cancer. Polonium 210 is the only component of cigarette smoke which has produced tumors by itself in inhalation experiments with animals.
    When a smoker inhales tobacco smoke, the lungs react by forming irritated areas in the bronchi. All smoke produces this effect. However, although these irritated spots are referred to as 'pre-cancerous' lesions, they are a perfectly natural defense system and usually go away with no adverse effects. Insoluble tars in tobacco smoke can slow this healing process by adhering to lesions and causing additional irritation. In addition, tobacco smoke causes the bronchi to constrict for long periods of time, which obstructs the lung's ability to clear itself of these residues.
    Polonium 210 and lead 210 in tobacco smoke show a tendency to accumulate at lesions in specific spots, called bifurcations, in the bronchi. When smoking is continued for an extended period of time, deposits of radioactivity turn into radioactive 'hot spots' and remain at bifurcations for years. Polonium 210 emits highly localized alpha radiation which has been shown to cause cancer. Since the polonium 210 has a half life of 21.5 years (Due to the presence of lead 210), it can put an ex-smoker at risk for years after he or she quits. Experiments measuring the level of polonium 210 in victims of lung cancer found that the level of 'hot spot' activity was virtually the same in smokers and ex-smokers even though the ex-smokers had quit five years prior to death.
    Over half of the radioactive materials emitted by a burning cigarette are released into the air, where they can be inhaled by non-smokers. In addition to lead 210 and polonium 210 it has been proven that tobacco smoke can cause airborne radioactive particles to collect in the lungs of both smokers and non-smokers exposed to second hand smoke. Original studies conducted on uranium miners
    which showed an increased risk of lung cancer due to exposure to radon in smokers have been re-run to evaluate the radioactive lung cancer risk from indoor air radon. It turns out that tobacco smoke works as a kind of 'magnet' for airborne radioactive particles, causing them to deposit in your lungs instead of on furniture. (Smoking indoors increases lung cancer risks greatly.)
    It has been estimated that the total accumulated alpha
    radiation exposure of a pack-a-day indoor smoker is 38 to 97 rad by age 60. (Two packs a day yields up to 143 rad, and non-smokers receive no more than 17 rad.) An exposure of 1 rad per year yields a 1% risk of lung cancer (at the lowest estimate.)
    Don't smoke. Or if you do, smoke lightly, outdoors, and engage frequently in activities which will clear your lungs.
    Imported India tobacco has less than half the radiation content of that grown in the U.S.

    Kicking the nicotine habit is not easy, and nobody has the
    right to expect it of you. Often physical addictions are
    reinforced by emotional and psychological needs. Filling or coming to terms with those needs can give you the inspiration and added freedom to succeed.
    Most of all, inform yourself, even if the information is
    disturbing. You are a lot less likely to be taken in by tobacco advertising once you know the facts.
    Nicotine, the active ingredient in tobacco smoke, has long
    been known to be highly addictive. In fact, doctors and
    pharmacologists are not in consensus as to which is more addictive -- nicotine, or heroin.
    Physical addiction occurs when a chemical becomes essential for the body or metabolism to function. In other words, a substance is said to be physically addictive if extended use results in a build up of tolerance in the body to the extent that discontinuing use of the substance results in negative side effects. Called "withdrawal symptoms," these consequences can
    include anxiety, stress, trauma, depression and physical conditions such as shakes or nausea. It is to avoid these consequences that an addict will keep using his or her substance.
    In addition to being addictive, nicotine is also a toxin (i.e. lethal if ingested in sufficient quantities.) Nicotine has been shown to have a negative effect on the heart and circulatory systems, causing a constriction in veins and arteries which may lead to a stroke or heart attack. In fact, nicotine is so poisonous that smokers who ignore their doctor's advice and continue to smoke while using dermal nicotine patches have managed to overdose and die of heart seizure.
    Many people think smoking marijuana is just as harmful as smoking tobacco, but this is not true. Those who hold that marijuana is equivalent to tobacco are misinformed. Due to the efforts of various federal agencies to discourage use of marijuana in the 1970's the government, in a fit of "reefer madness," conducted several biased studies designed to return results that would equate marijuana smoking with tobacco smoking, or worse.
    For example the Berkeley carcinogenic tar studies of the
    late 1970's concluded that "marijuana is one-and-a-half times as carcinogenic as tobacco." This finding was based solely on the tar content of cannabis leaves compared to that of tobacco, and did not take radioactivity into consideration. (Cannabis tars do not contain radioactive materials.) In addition, it was not considered that:
    1) Most marijuana smokers smoke the bud, not the leaf, of the plant. The bud contains only 33% as much tar as tobacco.
    2) Marijuana smokers do not smoke anywhere near as much as tobacco smokers, due to the psychoactive effects of cannabis.
    3) Not one case of lung cancer has ever been successfully
    linked to marijuana use.
    4) Cannabis, unlike tobacco, does not cause any narrowing of the small air passageways in the lungs.

    In fact, marijuana has been shown to be an expectorant and actually dilates the air channels it comes in contact with. This is why many asthma sufferers look to marijuana to provide relief. Doctors have postulated that marijuana may, in this respect, be more effective than all of the prescription drugs on the market.
    Studies even show that due to marijuana's ability to clear
    the lungs of smog, pollutants, and cigarette smoke, it may
    actually reduce your risk of emphysema, bronchitis, and lung
    cancer. Smokers of cannabis have been shown to outlive non- smokers in some areas by up to two years. Medium to heavy tobacco smokers will live seven to ten years longer if they also smoke marijuana.
    Cannabis is also radically different from tobacco in that it
    does not contain nicotine and is not addictive. The psychoactive ingredient in marijuana, THC, has been accused of causing brain and genetic damage, but these studies have all been disproven. In fact, the DEA's own Administrative Law Judge Francis Young has declared that "marijuana in its natural form is far safer than
    many foods we commonly consume."

    The disturbing thing about all of this information is that
    the majority of Americans are as yet unaware of the radioactive risk in cigarettes. In fact, many professionals: doctors, scientists and health administrators, either have never heard of polonium 210 or consider it to be just another scare story.
    Why is this information so hard to come by? When the studies were first released in the late 70's, many magazines were unable to print articles because their main advertisers, cigarette companies, threatened to pull support if they published the facts. Although network news did pick up the story, virtually nothing came out in print. Those who heard were hard pressed to produce collaborating evidence, and were eventually convinced it was nothing to worry about.
    The power of the cigarette industry to suppress information goes far beyond magazines, however. A well financed tobacco lobby has been very active in the United States Congress for decades procuring subsidies and fighting laws and proposed research which could hurt the American tobacco industry. Tobacco interests practically own Senate and House seats, as many campaign contributions come from cigarette profits. Tobacco pay- offs also go to fund organizations such as the Partnership For A Drug Free America, which adopt a harsh anti-drug agenda yet seem
    to omit alcohol and tobacco (claiming they are harmless.)
    As an example, a 1984 law which was intended to require
    tobacco companies to release to the public a list of additives
    used in the manufacture of cigarettes was watered down to the extent that the list is now released only to the Department of Health and Human Services on the condition that it not be shown to anyone else. Companies have been known in the past to add chemicals to cigarettes for flavor, and, many assert, for their addictive properties. In Britain such chemicals have included acetone and turpentine, as well as an assortment of known carcinogens.
    Tobacco companies argue that revealing their 'secret
    ingredients' would hurt their competitiveness. In fact, when
    Canada passed legislation forcing additive lists to be released, one large company reformulated its recipe for its Canadian distribution; another took its product out of Canada entirely.
    Tobacco companies do not have the right to poison the
    public. Don't trust them. Get the information you need to make your own decisions, and restore government to the people.

    Another destructive aspect of the Drug War is the
    unreasonable measures taken as a result of "reefer madness." Because of the long standing anti-pot-smoking paranoia begun in the 1930's, many law enforcement agencies have taken it upon themselves to censor and limit the marijuana culture through whatever channels they can find. This includes the banning of various forms of drug "paraphernalia" (pipes, clips, rolling papers, etc.)
    Water pipes, or "bongs," are quite often the target of such efforts. Claiming that water pipes are constructed to allow marijuana smokers to inhale "dangerous" marijuana smoke deeper into their lungs, many states and towns have passed laws controlling the sale, manufacture, and possession of these items for "health" reasons.
    The sad fact is, water pipes have been shown to be extremely effective in removing harmful materials from smoke before it reaches the lungs. They also cool the smoke and prevent injury and irritation to lung passages. In effect, laws against water pipes hurt all smokers, cannabis and tobacco, by preventing the development of safer forms of consumption.
  2. stop smoking that shit ! you are all going to die.

    *shakes head in dissapointment*
  3. This text is way too long to read , and who stole my smokes?

  4. I grew up in a tobacco patch and grew tobacco every summer until I moved away at age 23. I have never, ever, ever heard of a lwa that required tobacco farmers to fertilize their plants. If you wanted to fertilize, that was fine, if you didn't well that was your tough luck as well. But there is no law on the books taht says you have to fertilize.
  5. Congratulations on quitting smoking tobacco! I know how difficult that is!

    Tobacco is a pesticide. The industry is corrupt. It's just bad juju all around.
    I like this part of the article-
  6. awsome post
  7. How hard was quitting cigarettes?
  8. Cigarettes if you smoke alot everyday it can be so hard its like breaking a heroin addiction. Nicotine can affect the brain exactly like herion. I can quit cigs if I wanted to its easy for me i've faced harder addictions of other drugs before and I know the difference. But good post man it speaks the truth especially cannabis smoke is 1/3 the amount of tar than cigarettes. I ain't quitting till 2012 lol my philosophy my as well enjoy life and if the world continues after 2012 then I'm gonna quit immediately. But I believe th world may end then and gonna enjoy the last 5 years of my life. Its my belief.... I wonder though why do they put so many chemicals in tobacco I mean theirs 10 main ones that help out the nicotine infection in the lungs but all the 4,000 others WHY??
  9. they have a shot now that worked for a buddy of mine whos a bartender and sees people smoking all the time which always made him start smoking again but since the shot he quit cold turkey
  10. I went on a tobacco hiatus about two weeks ago, and I just might stay off it completely since I'm coughing up blood every day, as of two days ago.

  11. Thanks for posting this I am thinking about quitting cigarettes soon.
  12. I'm on a week now with no cig's and reading that made me :D.
  13. jesus :(
  14. ... Yeah. I know.

    I refuse to quit until my mother will quit with me. That's why I started in the first place. She's been doing it for 30 some years... me just one. She wants me to quit but I already told her I won't until she does... and I'll trade a year or two of my health to possibly save her life, unless it's to late.

    I'm not going to give her much longer and then I'm quitting anyway...
  15. smoking cigs. kills! whoever smokes cigs. are weak mentally!

    break the habit, load the bong! :D
  16. quitting cigs is 100x harder than any of you who have never smoked cigarettes believe it is. It's not as easy as, I'm gonna stop now! You need the stuff to operate normally and it's not like saying "I'm gonna stop smoking weed!" That would be infinitely easier than cigarettes. Anyone who said quitting cigs was easy was not a pack a day smoker for any significant amount of time. That's when it's actually hard. If I smoked only a few a day I don't think I'd have a problem, but as it is now I have one when I wake up before class in between classes, whenever I'm in my car, walking anywhere, after every bowl, and don't even get me started about while drinking.

    "quitting cigarettes is easy, I've done it 100 times" -Mark Twain
  17. Are you honestly going to make that general of an assumption?

    For fucks sake...
  18. does anyone realize how OLD this thread is?!?!?

    like 5 years lol

    yeh ive been thinking about quiting for serious because now everytime i smoke a ciggerette i feel kinda sick, but i have like 16 left inmy pack.....so this is my last pack.
  19. that is a pretty great thing your doing floydian. Im glad my parents dont smoke. My friends dad just died of lung cancer and the whole family is devistated. His mom still wont stop smoking though. Im not sure anything is going to get her to quit though.
  20. just about everyone in my family smokes... except my cuz who smokes the most green. I always hang out with my cuz and he wants me to smoke, so I'm in the process of quiting and hopefully will have quit before the growing season. :-D

Share This Page