Qualityland by Marc-Uwe Kling

Discussion in 'The Bookshelf' started by Vee, Sep 23, 2020.

  1. #1 Vee, Sep 23, 2020
    Last edited: Sep 23, 2020
    qqwq.jpg
    Bizarre: you gotta change your surname to the occupation of your father at your conception!

    Welcome to QualityLand, the best country on Earth. Here, a universal ranking system determines the social advantages and career opportunities of every member of society. An automated matchmaking service knows the best partners for everyone and helps with the break up when your ideal match (frequently) changes. And the foolproof algorithms of the biggest, most successful company in the world, TheShop, know what you want before you do and conveniently deliver to your doorstep before you even order it.

    In QualityCity, Peter Jobless is a machine scrapper who can't quite bring himself to destroy the imperfect machines sent his way, and has become the unwitting leader of a band of robotic misfits hidden in his home and workplace. One day, Peter receives a product from TheShop that he absolutely, positively knows he does not want, and which he decides, at great personal cost, to return. The only problem: doing so means proving the perfect algorithm of TheShop wrong, calling into question the very foundations of QualityLand itself.

    Qualityland, Marc-Uwe Kling's first book to be translated into English, is a brilliantly clever, illuminating satire in the tradition of Kurt Vonnegut, Douglas Adams, and George Orwell that offers a visionary, frightening, and all-too funny glimpse at a near future we may be hurtling toward faster than it's at all comfortable to admit. So why delay any longer? TheShop already knows you're going to love this book. You may as well head to the cash register, crack the covers, and see why that is for yourself.

    Although Kling is German, his style of humor as it appears in Jamie Searle Romanelli's excellent English translation is right in line with British comedy sensibilities exhibited in the novels of Doug Adams, Terry Pratchett and Jasper Fforde (and a bit of Monty Python to boot). Humor is subjective, true, but I can almost guarantee that if you've enjoyed any of these works, you'll like Qualityland. Perhaps more to the point, Kling has the uncanny ability to analyze Western society's current political and technological trends and predict where their trajectories will lead

    Fun and Funny: stoner value = High

    typical in line with me half way thru only to hear HBO is making a series
    HBO to adapt German satirical novel 'QualityLand' into a TV series | DW | 13.03.2019
     
  2. a few weeks later and I'm still slowing digesting this tomb of wizdom
    the spoiler may offer a reason why Amazon indeed GrassCity are so popular
    “A simple cybernetic system is a thermostat. It compares the
    actual temperature—the actual value—with the desired
    temperature—the desired value—and regulates the heating if
    necessary, repeatedly comparing the new actual and desired
    values, readjusting, and so on. Did you understand that?”
    “Yes.”
    “TheShop is also a cybernetic system. A much more
    complex one, of course.” The old man scratches his head. “Did
    you know that, in the beginning, it was strictly forbidden to use
    the internet for commercial purposes?” he asks. “It’s hard to
    imagine, isn’t it?”
    “It really is.”
    “The final restrictions were lifted in 1995, and commerce
    overtook the net. Nonetheless, we still believed back then that
    the internet could break the monopoly of the big companies.
    We thought that a market with countless alternatives would
    emerge, because with an online shop it was easier than ever to
    reach customers worldwide. But the exact opposite happened!
    The most powerful monopolies that have ever existed came into
    being.”
    “Despite the internet,” says Peter.
    “Nonsense,” says the old man. “Because of the internet! It’s
    called the network effect. And it’s demonic.”
    “What’s the network effect?”
    “The use of some products is dependent on the number of
    product users. Imagine you find a telephone provider that
    offers you the most reasonable tariff, but unfortunately with one
    small catch: you can only call people who use the same
    provider, and you’re the only user.”
    “I understand.”
    “Really?”
    “The more users such a network has, the more useful it
    is.”
    “Yes. And once a provider has reached a critical mass of
    users, it’s extremely difficult for a new competitor to catch up
    with this usefulness advantage. The network effect is a
    self-strengthening effect and leads to the creation of monopolies.
    Or perhaps I should say, to the formation of a dominant
    platform. Take TheShop, for example: the more customers
    TheShop has, the more providers are forced to offer their
    wares with TheShop, which leads to TheShop having even
    more products on offer, which means more customers find
    what they’re looking for at TheShop, therefore TheShop gains
    more customers. This is where the cat bites itself in the tail:
    because the more customers TheShop has, the more providers
    are forced to offer their wares with TheShop, and the more…”
    “Okay,” says Peter. “I get it. The internet is evil.”
    “Nonsense,” says the old man. “I’m not saying it’s an evil
    technology. I’m just saying that one has to take its beginnings
    into consideration. It’s not a coincidence that the so-called
    cyberspace is increasingly becoming an immense control
    machine that steers robots, living organisms, and social
    organizations.”
    Peter takes a notepad and pen out of his jacket pocket.
    “Perhaps I should make a few notes,” he says.
    “Good idea!” says the old man. “Good idea. You know, we
    thought that the internet would have a democratizing effect. We
    thought it could generate equality of opportunity. Instead, the
    income divide is greater than ever. What did we overlook?”
    “I’m sure you’re about to tell me.”
    “Correct. We didn’t take into consideration that the digital
    markets function according to the winner-takes-all principle.
    That’s different to the nondigital markets.”
    “An example?” asks Peter.
    “Let’s say there are two ice-cream parlors on your street.
    Ice-cream parlor A is a tad better. Where would you go?”
    “Well, to parlor A.”
    “But everybody thinks like that. So there’s always a huge
    queue in front of parlor A. Sometimes they’ve even run out of
    your favorite flavor before you arrive. And parlor B really is
    only fractionally less good and not as crowded. Where would
    you go?”
    “Parlor B.”
    “And that’s how the clientele divides itself. Because ice
    cream can’t be copied and given out to all customers at once.
    Completely unlike…?”
    “Digital products,” says Peter. “When you get me to
    complete your sentences I feel like a stupid schoolboy.”
    “Rightfully so, rightfully so. Thus, from that we can conclude
    even if it were only minimally worse, there would be no reason
    to use the second-best search engine. Winner takes it all.
    Loser gets nothing. In the digital economy, nobody needs the
    second-best product, the second-best provider, the second-best
    social network, the second-best shop, the second-best comedian,
    the second-best singer. It’s a superstar economy. Long live the
    superstar, fuck the rest.”

    after 207 views I hope for your comment? ..lol
     

Share This Page