This is the last post I'm going to make regarding this topic. Holy hell, talk about a double strandard. So it's not okay to kill a US citizen, who was involved in the publishing of radical Islam propaganda, but it is okay kill a criminal with a gun in the streets of the US. Fuck the whole right to a fair trial thing, amiright? (Don't even attempt to strawman my arguement, I'm not saying the killing of Al Awlaki was justified)
What difference is it whether a drone kills him, the liqour store owner kills him or the cop kills him. The man was a theif and is violating the non aggression principle. I don't see how having a drone kill a criminal violates NAP? I mean like it or not, times are a changiing, and soon drones will be everywhere.
Wait... so the NAP only applies to people who have never violated the NAP themselves? Once you steal, you're fair game?
I honestly couldn't tell, it legitimately sounds like something that would come out of the mouth of a Rand Paul supporter.
http://intentionalworldview.com/Deontology+%28Right+and+Wrong+Action%29#Justifiable_responses_to_rule_violations_Justice_Etiquette_Aesthetics_: ^ \tJustifiable responses to rule violations (Justice / Etiquette / Aesthetics)
Some anarcho-capitalist on my facebook unfriended me because I questioned his support of Rand Paul for president. He said in response to my questioning, "this is why we can't have nice things." I still don't know what that means. Anyway,I thought my last sentence was a dead giveaway. Who robs a store for 50 dollars? There are obviously various things that could be going on in that situation. The guy is not necessarily a criminal.
Speaking on that... r/libertarian is in pitiful shape. I thought it being rife with Rand supporters were bad. Not until I encountered Iraq War apologists, people using Newt Gingrich and libertarian in the same sentence, and neocons in general. I am very curious as to why they stray away from their respective subreddits and have to infest r/libertarian with their slime. I really don't get it. Is fox news showcasing some pseudo-libertarians? They think any cuts to the size of government makes them a libertarian.
Haha alright, you definitely had me going. I mean shit, I guess no one better open carry legally anymore with 50 bucks in their back pocket under a Rand Paul presidency.
I ripped that guy who was saying Gingrich is a Libertarian a new one and got downvoted to hell, I'll admit that I was pretty blunt, but that sub has definitely gone down the shitter as of late.
Everyone has a right to protect their life, liberty and property and the life liberty and property of another whose rights have been violated.. NAP is not a pacifist philosophy it allows for self defense. Otherwise you would not have anarchy but chaos. As a fraction of the population with no moral qualms could do whatever they want to the pacifist majority without fear. Libertarians are not lambs. Obviously the person should be given a chance to surrender if possible.
whatever happened to deep thoughts by benny? I miss those, how come no one ever posts them? cough cough think about it