You are drifting way off topic. She made her money on speeches and books. She is worth only 31.3 million, Bill is worth 111 million. None of their income came from the Foundation, unlike the Trump Foundations many illegal actions. She was paid $186,000 a year as Secretary, Bill gets $200,000 from having been President. You avoided the main thrust - Trump. But I guess when a con man is being discussed the best thing is to point to the squirrel and hope others forget the topic.
Pizza gate = debunked But here's an interesting article on one of Trumps campaign chairmen : BUSTED: Trump campaign chair caught in a motel room with an underage boy
and I did click the link, and read through it. Again, I don't find it strange that 1. A member of congress met with a russian delegate. The simple reason is that they ALL do it, thats their damn job! 2. A guy who worked for one of the biggest oil companies in the world, did business with someone in russia. why? I think russia probably drills and refines some oil, if not, they surely use it dont they? 3. Flynn, see answer for sessions, answer 1. Its rediculous that democrats can sit there and say these meetings are off base when there is absolute proof that they have taken those meetings as well! Its a witch hunt, and its grasping at straws. There is nothing there...its a straw man, its the shiny object to distract you from whats really happening in the world.
I'm not drifting, I'm explaining why I used that example..or do you want me to ignore that you challenge it? I'm not sure what you want me to do here. I'm trying to show you examples of jumping to conclusions, ect. The first line on that story btw is "its not clear". Meaning, they don't know. Going back to my oriningal point that even though everyone and their brother WANTS there to be a story, no one can find one. There are reporters and editors that are openly broadcasting thousands and thousands of dollars in rewards for "trump/russia" info. If our CIA can get their damn tools hacked and stolen, if they (CIA) can release an illegal wiretap of an american citizen to discredit them, then why the hell can't they find anything concrete about russia? Because its not there.
thats unfortunately a very common occurrence now, and its fucking sick and disgusting. I hope someone chops that guys balls off in prison and make him choke on them. But, the headline is sizzling isn't it? Child trafficking is a REAL issue, and its rooted very deep in the culture of the elites. There is zero denying that. I'm not sure what part of "pizzagate" was debunked...because the entire thing isn't about that stupid pizza place in DC (which is fucking creepy, btw, so is the owner, best friends of pedesta) Its also extremely important to note, that the reason James comey stood up and said that they were re-opening the clinton investigation was because they found links to child porn and child trafficking on anthony wieners computer. Whats wiener got to do with it? Hes the estranged husband of Hillary Clintons "surrogate" daughter, huma abadeen, who was notably absent the last few days of the campaign after this info came out. I don't want to be accused of going off topic again, just want to point out that i'm responding to this posting
I said the clintons, not the obama's. heres a link to their wiki. There are many many many instances of the improper solicitations, not to mention the whole haiti debacle.
there has been an awful lot of interesting connections and strange dealing that happened between trump's administration and the russians. All of Trump’s Ties to Russia, in 7 Charts there may be absolutely nothing there. it could all be just part of routine business procedures... but, it sure has raised a lot of questions. i don't see how you could say that you are interested in finding out the truth, somehow bring pizzagate into this thing.. and yet ignore all the potential connections that have been exposed thus far.
I appreciate your response and also support your stance on pedophilia and sex trafficking in general. Headlines are meant to attract viewers to the story. Comey's reopening of the case was nothing new, the FBI leaves the door slightly open on many cases, but i found it odd that he did reopen this case 11 days before the election. Now with Wiener aka Carlos Danger, this guy is a creep and has a history of being one : Anthony Weiner sexting scandals - Wikipedia I quoted your Pizzagate reference and posted the link to show that there are also very shady kid diddlers in Trumps circle and there is very substantial evidence of Shortey's wrongdoings. Pizzagate itself does not have this type of evidence.
I was using pizzagate as an example of a story that was rather beaten to death online, with very little info, other than the emails from podesta. Which, those emails are just really fucking strange. I was trying to use it as a comparison to what is happening with trump/russia. Lot of smoke, little to no fire, except in pizza gate there was some fire at least, whereas with trump/russia, all you have is "interesting connections" I was certainly not trying to turn this into a discussion about the clintons or pizzagate or any of that, merely using it as an example, and then responding to a few questions that were posed about it.
as with most things related closely to the clintons the story faded away pretty quickly, but it was widely reported by many different outlets, that the fbi found evidence of child trafficking and child porn on his computer. I would urge you to do some digging on your own and see what you find.
Nothing went away it just stopped being a breaking news story you know like every news event that happens in this country. It's not like we're talking about Dennis Hastert right now even though he was found to have abused over a dozen kids sexually during his tenure as the GOP speaker. It's not because it's a conspiracy it's because it's no longer relevant in the moment. There was reports of a grand jury in october maaube happening but that's cole and gone. Additionally this is Preet Braharas office investigating Weiner who was just fired by Trump days ago. He's known to be one of the more bipartisan people in his office considering he's prosecuted more democrats than republicans on corruption, despite being appointed by a democrat. In fact he was currently working on investigating both Bill De Blaise and Andrew Cuomo for campaign finance violations. It's unlikely anything sketchy is happening with Wiener. More likely either the grand jury cleared him or has yet to convene due to various possible circumstances. It's hard to tell though because news organizations don't care enough about Weiner to invest resources when they have to cover hundreds of new breaking stories everyday.
There wasn't even any smoke let alone fire in the pizzagate crap. With Trump there are known connections, known communications, and a known history of oligarchies lending and buying from him at greatly over-priced costs. Then add in discussions of dropping sanctions, tweaking the Republican platform on only one area, and a lot of smoke gets generated. Enough to look for fire, especially in light of the fact that the Trumps stand to make a lot of money from said oligarchs once the sanctions go away. A lot of the (fake) news stories about Clinton was done by paid trolls, they benefitted very well by the traffic they generated and their pay for doing so. He can end it by showing his taxes, as a minimum I would like to see the IRS letter stating he was being audited (not an attorney's claim, the letter). He most certainly could release the upcoming 2016 taxes and be done with it.
Russian state-owned network RT paid more than $45,000 for Michael Flynn to travel to Moscow to speak in December 2015, Yahoo News reported, citing a document obtained by a congressional committee. At the time, Flynn was a retired lieutenant general and former Defense Intelligence Agency director. He would later become President Donald Trump's campaign advisor and first national security advisor, until he was forced to resign over misstatements about his communications with a Russian diplomat. Flynn went on a three-day trip with his son, Michael Flynn Jr., staying in a five-star hotel at the Russian government's expense for RT's 10th anniversary celebration in 2015, according to Yahoo. Flynn got nearly $34,000 from the engagement, the report said. In addition, it said, his speaking agency received a 25 percent commission. Some Democrats allege that Flynn's trip appeared to run afoul of rules barring former military officers from accepting consulting fees, gifts or travel expenses from a foreign government, Yahoo said. It also raises questions about what Trump knew about Flynn's Russian connections before hiring him. Russia reportedly paid $45,000 for Michael Flynn's 2015 talk
@well highdrated The article didn't note that Trump and his counsel were briefed about it three weeks before they fired him. They even denied knowing a few times.