Nothing will change until we recognize the predators in our midst - Psychopaths

Troy McLure · Aug 16, 2009

source:
Twilight and the trick of the psychopaths Â« Under The Radar Media

Twilight and the trick of the psychopaths

I make the effort to share this information because it gives me, at last, a plausible answer to a long-unanswered question: Why, no matter how much intelligent goodwill exists in the world, is there so much war, suffering and injustice? It doesn't seem to matter what creative plan, ideology, religion, or philosophy great minds come up with, nothing seems to improve our lot. Since the dawn of civilization, this pattern repeats itself over and over again. The answer is that civilization, as we know it, is largely the creation of psychopaths. All civilizations, our own included, have been built on slavery and mass murder. Psychopaths have played a disproportionate role in the development of civilization, because they are hard-wired to lie, kill, cheat, steal, torture, manipulate, and generally inflict great suffering on other humans without feeling any remorse, in order to establish their own sense of security through domination. The inventor of civilization â€“ the first tribal chieftain who successfully brainwashed an army of controlled mass murderers â€“ was almost certainly a genetic psychopath. Since that momentous discovery, psychopaths have enjoyed a significant advantage over non-psychopaths in the struggle for power in civilizational hierarchies â€“ especially military hierarchies.

Behind the apparent insanity of contemporary history, is the actual insanity of psychopaths fighting to preserve their disproportionate power. And as their power grows ever-more-threatened, the psychopaths grow ever-more-desperate. We are witnessing the apotheosis of the overworld â€“ the overlapping criminal syndicates that lurk above ordinary society and law just as the underworld lurks below it.

During the past fifty years, psychopaths have gained almost absolute control of all the branches of government. You can notice this if you observe carefully that no matter what illegal thing a modern politician does, no one will really take him to task. All of the so called scandals that have come up, any one of which would have taken down an authentic administration, are just farces played out for the public, to distract them, to make them think that the democracy is still working.

One of the main factors to consider in terms of how a society can be taken over by a group of pathological deviants is that the psychopaths' only limitation is the participation of susceptible individuals within that given society. Lobaczewski gives an average figure for the most active deviants of approximately 6% of a given population. (1% essential psychopaths and up to 5% other psychopathies and characteropathies.) The essential psychopath is at the center of the web. The others form the first tier of the psychopath's control system.

The next tier of such a system is composed of individuals who were born normal, but are either already warped by long-term exposure to psychopathic material via familial or social influences, or who, through psychic weakness have chosen to meet the demands of psychopathy for their own selfish ends. Numerically, according to Lobaczewski, this group is about 12% of a given population under normal conditions.

So approximately 18% of any given population is active in the creation and imposition of a Pathocracy. The 6% group constitutes the Pathocratic nobility and the 12% group forms the new bourgeoisie, whose economic situation is the most advantageous.
When you understand the true nature of psychopathic influence, that it is conscienceless, emotionless, selfish, cold and calculating, and devoid of any moral or ethical standards, you are horrified, but at the same time everything suddenly begins to makes sense. Our society is ever more soulless because the people who lead it and who set the example are soulless â€“ they literally have no conscience.

In his book Political ponerology, Andrej Lobaczewski explains that clinical psychopaths enjoy advantages even in non-violent competitions to climb the ranks of social hierarchies. Because they can lie without remorse (and without the telltale physiological stress that is measured by lie detector tests), psychopaths can always say whatever is necessary to get what they want. In court, for example, psychopaths can tell extreme bald-faced lies in a plausible manner, while their sane opponents are handicapped by an emotional predisposition to remain within hailing distance of the truth. Too often, the judge or jury imagines that the truth must be somewhere in the middle, and then issues decisions that benefit the psychopath. As with judges and juries, so too with those charged with decisions concerning who to promote and who not to promote in corporate, military and governmental hierarchies. The result is that all hierarchies inevitably become top-heavy with psychopaths. Since psychopaths have no limitations on what they can or will do to get to the top, the ones in charge are generally pathological. It is not power that corrupts, it is that corrupt individuals seek power.

How can we distinguish between psychopaths and healthy people? What is the portrait of a true psychopath?
Such a dangerous question has almost never been successfully asked. The reason is because we mistakenly confuse healthy for normal. Human psychological diversity is the health of our race. There is no normal because healthy humans continuously evolve beyond all normalizing standards. The terrorism of searching through hierarchies for anyone deviating from normal is no different from witch hunts or Inquisitions. You must remember that hierarchies thrive on such low dramas, torturing victims until they confess to evil beliefs. Not so long ago the church and state ongoingly acquired significant income and property through witch hunts and Inquisitions. This continued for over two hundred and fifty years. Ten generations of Europeans understood pogrom as normal life. Let us not return to that nightmare. Testing for normal is guaranteed to backfire in our face. There is no normal. But there is conscience.

We have very little empirical evidence to support the idea that true psychopathy is the result of an abused childhood, and much empirical evidence to support that it is genetic. The neurobiological model offers us the greatest hope of being able to identify even the most devious psychopath. Other recent studies lead to similar results and conclusions: that psychopaths have great difficulty processing verbal and nonverbal affective (emotional) material, that they tend to confuse the emotional significance of events, and most importantly, that these deficits show up in brain scans! A missing internal connection between the feeling heart and the thinking brain is detectable.

Psychopaths are incapable of authentic deep emotions. In fact, when Robert Hare, a Canadian psychologist who spent his career studying psychopathy, did brain scans on psychopaths while showing them two sets of words, one set of neutral words with no emotional associations and a second set with emotionally charged words, while different areas of the brain lit up in the non-psychopathic control group, in the psychopaths, both sets were processed in the same area of the brain, the area that deals with language. They did not have an emotional reaction until they intellectually concluded that it would be better if they had one, and then they whipped up an emotional response just for show.

The simplest, clearest and truest portrait of the psychopath is given in the titles of three seminal works on the subject: Without Conscience by Robert Hare, The Mask of Sanity by Hervey Cleckley, and Snakes in Suits by Robert Hare and Paul Babiak. A psychopath is exactly that: conscienceless. The most important thing to remember is that this lack of conscience is hidden from view behind a mask of normality that is often so convincing that even experts are deceived. As a result, psychopaths become the Snakes in Suits that control our world.

Psychopaths lack a sense of remorse or empathy with others. They can be extremely charming and are experts at using talk to charm and hypnotize their prey. They are also irresponsible. Nothing is ever their fault; someone else or the world at large is always to blame for all of their problems or their mistakes. Martha Stout, in her book The Sociopath Next Door, identifies what she calls the pity ploy. Psychopaths use pity to manipulate. They convince you to give them one more chance, and to not tell anyone about what they have done. So another trait â€“ and a very important one â€“ is their ability to control the flow of information.

They also seem to have little real conception of past or future, living entirely for their immediate needs and desires. Because of the barren quality of their inner life, they are often seeking new thrills, anything from feeling the power of manipulating others to engaging in illegal activities simply for the rush of adrenaline.

Another trait of the psychopath is what Lobaczewski calls their special psychological knowledge of normal people. They have studied us. They know us better than we know ourselves. They are experts in knowing how to push our buttons, to use our emotions against us. But beyond that, they even seem to have some sort of hypnotic power over us. When we begin to get caught up in the web of the psychopath, our ability to think deteriorates, gets muddied. They seem to cast some sort of spell over us. It is only later when we are no longer in their presence, out of their spell, that the clarity of thought returns and we find ourselves wondering how it was that we were unable to respond or counter what they were doing.

Psychopaths learn to recognize each other in a crowd as early as childhood, and they develop an awareness of the existence of other individuals similar to themselves. They also become conscious of being of a different world from the majority of other people surrounding them. They view us from a certain distance.
Think about the ramifications of this statement: Psychopaths are, to some extent, self-aware as a group even in childhood! Recognizing their fundamental difference from the rest of humanity, their allegiance would be to others of their kind, that is, to other psychopaths.
Their own twisted sense of honor compels them to cheat and revile non-psychopaths and their values. In contradiction to the ideals of normal people, psychopaths feel breaking promises and agreements is normal behavior.
Not only do they covet possessions and power and feel they have the right to them just because they exist and can take them, but they gain special pleasure in usurping and taking from others; what they can plagiarize, swindle, and extort are fruits far sweeter than those they can earn through honest labor. They also learn very early how their personalities can have traumatizing effects on the personalities of non-psychopaths, and how to take advantage of this root of terror for purposes of achieving their goals.

So now, imagine how human beings who are totally in the dark about the presence of psychopaths can be easily deceived and manipulated by these individuals, gaining power in different countries, pretending to be loyal to the local populations while at the same time playing up obvious and easily discernible physical differences between groups (such as race, skin color, religion, etc). Psychologically normal humans would be set against one another on the basis of unimportant differences (think of Rwanda 1994, think of Israelis and Palestinians) while the deviants in power, with a fundamental difference from the rest of us, a lack of conscience, an inability to feel for another human being, reaped the benefits and pulled the strings.

We are seeing the final desperate power-grab or endgame of brutal, cunning gangs of CIA drug-runners and President-killers; money-laundering international bankers and their hit-men â€“ economic and otherwise; corrupt military contractors and gung-ho generals; corporate predators and their political enablers; brainwashers and mind-rapists euphemistically known as psy-ops and PR specialists â€“ in short, the whole crew of certifiable psychopaths running our so-called civilization. And they are running scared.

Why does the Pathocracy fear it is losing control? Because it is threatened by the spread of knowledge. The greatest fear of any psychopath is of being found out.

Psychopaths go through life knowing that they are completely different from other people. Deep down they know something is missing in them. They quickly learn to hide their lack of empathy, while carefully studying others' emotions so as to mimic normalcy while cold-bloodedly manipulating the normals.

Today, thanks to new information technologies, we are on the brink of unmasking the psychopaths and building a civilization of, by and for the healthy human being â€“ a civilization without war, a civilization based on truth, a civilization in which the saintly few rather than the diabolical few would gravitate to positions of power. We already have the knowledge necessary to diagnose psychopathic personalities and keep them out of power. We have the knowledge necessary to dismantle the institutions in which psychopaths especially flourish â€“ militaries, intelligence agencies, large corporations, and secret societies. We simply need to disseminate this knowledge, and the will to use it, as widely and as quickly as possible.

Until the knowledge and awareness of pathological human beings is given the attention it deserves and becomes part of the general knowledge of all human beings, there is no way that things can be changed in any way that is effective and long-lasting. If half the people agitating for truth or stopping the war or saving the earth would focus their efforts, time and money on exposing psychopathy, we might get somewhere.

One might ask if the weak point of our society has been our tolerance of psychopathic behavior? Our disbelief that someone could seem like an intelligent leader and still be acting deceptively on their own behalf without conscience? Or is it merely ignorance?
If the general voting public is not aware that there exists a category of people we sometimes perceive as almost human, who look like us, who work with us, who are found in every race, every culture, speaking every language, but who are lacking conscience, how can the general public take care to block them from taking over the hierarchies? General ignorance of psychopathology may prove to be the downfall of civilization. We stand by like grazing sheep as political/corporate elites throw armies of our innocent sons and daughters against fabricated enemies as a way of generating trillions in profits, vying against each other for pathological hegemony.

Nearly everyone who has been part of an organization working for social change has probably seen the same dynamic play out: The good and sincere work of many can be destroyed by the actions of one person. That doesn't bode well for bringing some sort of justice to the planet! In fact, if psychopaths dominate political hierarchies, is it any wonder that peaceful demonstrations have zero impact on the outcome of political decisions? Perhaps it is time to choose something other than massive, distant hierarchies as a way of governing ourselves?

So many efforts to provide essays, research reports, exposÃ©s and books to leaders so they might take the new information to heart and change their behavior have come to naught. For example, in the final paragraph of his revised edition of the book, The Party's Over, Richard Heinberg writes:

I still believe that if the people of the world can be helped to understand the situation we are in, the options available, and the consequences of the path we are currently on, then it is at least possible that they can be persuaded to undertake the considerable effort and sacrifice that will be entailed in a peaceful transition to a sustainable, locally based, decentralized, low-energy, resource-conserving social regime. But inspired leadership will be required.

And that is the just-murdered fantasy. There are no inspired leaders anymore. And in hierarchical structures there can't be. Assuming that you can elect men or women to office who will see reason and the light of day, and who will change and learn and grow, make compassionate decisions and take conscientious actionsâ€¦ is a foolish, childish dream. Continuing to dream it simply plays into psychopathic agendas.

Only when the 75% of humanity with a healthy conscience come to understand that we have a natural predator, a group of people who live amongst us, viewing us as powerless victims to be freely fed upon for achieving their inhuman ends, only then will we take the fierce and immediate actions needed to defend what is preciously human. Psychological deviants have to be removed from any position of power over people of conscience, period. People must be made aware that such individuals exist and must learn how to spot them and their manipulations. The hard part is that one must also struggle against those tendencies to mercy and kindness in oneself in order not to become prey.

The real problem is that the knowledge of psychopathy and how psychopaths rule the world has been effectively hidden. People do not have the adequate, nuanced knowledge they need to really make a change from the bottom up. Again and again, throughout history it has been meet the new boss, same as the old boss. If there is any work that is deserving of full time efforts and devotion for the sake of helping humanity in this present dark time, it is the study of psychopathy and the propagation of this information as far and wide and fast as possible.

There are only two things that can bring a psychopath under submission:
1. A bigger psychopath.
2. The non-violent, absolute refusal to submit to psychopathic controls no matter the consequences (non-violent noncompliance).

Let us choose path 2! If individuals simply sat down and refused to lift a hand to further one single aim of the psychopathic agenda, if people refused to pay taxes, if soldiers refused to fight, if government workers and corporate drones and prison guards refused to go to work, if doctors refused to treat psychopathic elites and their families, the whole system would grind to a screeching halt.

True change happens in the moment that a person becomes aware of psychopathy in all its chilling details. From this new awareness, the world looks different, and entirely new actions can be taken. Distinguishing between human and psychopathic qualities begins the foundation of responsibility upon which we have a real chance to create sustainable culture.
Click to expand...

Kylesa · Aug 16, 2009

So you're saying the world is fucked up because it's run by psychopaths? That is probably the most errantly naive view of the grievances of the modern man that I think I've ever heard.

SpacedOut · Aug 16, 2009

Psychopaths learn to recognize each other in a crowd as early as childhood, and they develop an awareness of the existence of other individuals similar to themselves. They also become conscious of being of a different world from the majority of other people surrounding them. They view us from a certain distance.
Think about the ramifications of this statement: Psychopaths are, to some extent, self-aware as a group even in childhood! Recognizing their fundamental difference from the rest of humanity, their allegiance would be to others of their kind, that is, to other psychopaths.
Their own twisted sense of honor compels them to cheat and revile non-psychopaths and their values. In contradiction to the ideals of normal people, psychopaths feel breaking promises and agreements is normal behavior.

Worst comic book villains ever.

420420420 · Aug 17, 2009

Once you are capable of identifying and observing sociopaths (thought this link was more insightful) in your every day interactions, you will acknowledge the large impact that sociopaths have in our lives and history

Whatever you want to call it: sociopathy, psychopathy, anti-social personality disorder, or extreme narcissism, this 2% of the population has brought us such gems as Bernie Madoff, Ted Bundy, and Stalin. The main goal for these people is to get to the top. Their entire goal in life is to dominate all of those around them and they generally tend to be successful in conning their victims.

Not having a conscience + lust for power = bad people getting into influential positions

Despite this emotional deficiency, most psychopaths learn to mimic the appearance of normal emotion well enough to fit into ordinary society, not unlike the way that the hearing impaired or illiterate learn to use other cues to compensate for their disabilities. As Hare describes it, psychopaths â€œknow the words but not the music.â€ One might imagine that such a false and superficial front would be easily penetrated, but such is rarely the case, probably because of the assumption we all tend to make that others think and feel essentially the same way as ourselves. Differences in culture, gender, personality, and social status all create empathy gaps that can seem almost unfathomable, but none of these is as fundamental a divide as the one that exists between an individual with a conscience and one without. The psychopath's psychology is so profoundly alien to most people that we are unable to comprehend their motives, or recognize one when we see one. Naturally, the industrious psychopath will find this to his advantage.
Click to expand...

Read the description of a sociopath in the links in this thread, It is very likely you have encountered many of these throughout your life whether you have noticed it or not.

UnbyJP · Aug 17, 2009

1. Do you often feel used by the person?
2. Have you often felt that he (or she) doesn't care about you?
3. Does he lie and deceive you?
4. Does he tend to make contradictory statements?
5. Does he tend to take from you and not give back much?
6. Does he often appeal to pity? Does he seem to try to make you feel sorry for him?
7. Does he try to make you feel guilty?
8. Do you sometimes feel he is taking advantage of your good nature?
9. Does he seem easily bored and need constant stimulation?
10. Does he use a lot of flattery? Does he interact with you in a way that makes you feel flattered even if he says nothing overtly complimentary?
11. Does he make you feel worried? Does he do it obviously or more cleverly and sneakily?
12. Does he give you the impression you owe him?
13. Does he chronically fail to take responsibility for harming others? Does he blame everyone and everything but himself?

Click to expand...

LOL.
'HE'?
Sexist.

Troy McLure · Aug 17, 2009

Kylesa said:

So you're saying the world is fucked up because it's run by psychopaths? That is probably the most errantly naive view of the grievances of the modern man that I think I've ever heard.
Click to expand...

more naive than the 'incompetence' excuse? more naive than 'it's human nature'? more naive than 'god works in mysterious ways'?

the "psychopath explanation" is based on well-founded mainstream science.
it is scientifically observable.

UnbyJP said:

LOL.
'HE'?
Sexist.
Click to expand...

IIRC only 1 in 10 psychopaths is female...

Kylesa · Aug 17, 2009

No one is saying there isn't psycopaths, but as I asserted, it's errantly irresponsible explanation of why our world is screwed up. There's a much better (By better I mean well-founded with research, facts, and empirical evidence) philosophy of why our world (More specifically, our Government(s)) are screwed up. It has to do with the proliferation of 'progressive' ideals, when history and logic rightly confirm that economic and personal freedom are what keeps individuals free from some of the plights you listed above.

This crazy philosophy I subscribe to is called libertianism, perhaps you should read up a bit on it. Check out books by Ayn Rand. It sounds to me like you're more interested in philosophy than you are civil issues, so starting with the philosophy end of libertarianism would probably be best. I don't believe everyone in our Government is incompetent, I just think they want the best for their country, the unfortunate thing is, they're sorely misguided. The philosophy I subscribe to points out that modern day demagogues and moral busibodies are inherently flawed in their altruistic thinking--the best way to help people is to let them be free citizens, free as long as they don't harm anyone else.

But concerning what you've espoused in this thread, and what was contained in the link you posted, it was borderline conspiracy theory, and 100% pure, unadulterated non-sense. I read about, 25 minutes into it, and I couldn't stomach it anymore. The author of that cacophany of words was imaging issues, and expanding upon them, almost as if he were on psychadelics. That type of logic passes in children's literature perhaps, where magical faeries can rid you of your responsibilities as a human being and allow you to fly around and be a kid for the rest of your life. Meanwhile, on planet earth...

Troy McLure · Aug 17, 2009

Kylesa said:

I don't believe everyone in our Government is incompetent, I just think they want the best for their country, the unfortunate thing is, they're sorely misguided.

[...]

the best way to help people is to let them be free citizens, free as long as they don't harm anyone else.
Click to expand...

so despite example after example to the contrary you still think government wants the best for us? sorry but i can't buy that.

@free citizens: sure, that sounds nice, i would love that.
but in which country at which time has this utopic situation ever occurred?

i suggest you read some of Dr. Hare's work (he is one of THE authorities on psychopathy)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Hare_(psychologist)
especially snakes in suits - which applies understanding of psychopathy to the business world.

ideologies like the one you favor are all fine and good, but unfortunately they will ALWAYS be subverted and hijacked by psychopaths for their own goals unless there is widespread awareness of these predators and their modus operandi.

Kylesa · Aug 17, 2009

You missed my point entirely. My point was that, everything Government does, is an act of inherent benevolence, they're serving their citizens, but they don't realize that Government has an almost immutable penchant for poorly allocating resources, dictating damaging social policy, and regulating and taxing us into oblivion. The best thing is for there to be limited (Small) Government, and we will be freer citizens.

Do you honestly think that Obama, his entire advisory staff, the two Houses of Congress, and their advisory staffs, the hundreds of thousands of people that work in the various departments, committees, commissions, boards, panels, etc. are ALL psychopaths?

I'm sorry, but if you honestly believe that, you're a lunatic.

Troy McLure · Aug 17, 2009

Kylesa said:

Do you honestly think that Obama, his entire advisory staff, the two Houses of Congress, and their advisory staffs, the hundreds of thousands of people that work in the various departments, committees, commissions, boards, panels, etc. are ALL psychopaths?

I'm sorry, but if you honestly believe that, you're a lunatic.
Click to expand...

no, that is insane and completely unnecessary.

if you'd read the article, you'd know that only a very small percentage are actually psychopaths - the rest are normal people being manipulated to do their bidding.

just combine the idea of psychopathic individuals in power with the knowledge learned from the extremely important Milgram Experiment - THAT's how a few percent of pathological deviants have the whole planet in their grip.
Milgram experiment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

this is a complex subject and can not be understood without actually doing some reading on it. (which is exactly why the psychopaths still roam free and do as they please)

maxrule · Aug 17, 2009

Agreed.

420420420 · Aug 17, 2009

I agree with Troy

No, not all members of the government and corporate elite are psychopaths, but what the job entails and the road to being in that position is right up the alley for a sociopath. As I said earlier, if you have ever been well acquainted with a sociopath (as in family member, close "friend", boss, "significant other") you would understand the effect that these type of people can have over others, often times coming out as the "dominant" individuals in practically every decently sized group (regardless of the intention of the group).

They tend to have higher than average intelligence, superficial charm, authoritarian personality, extreme hunger for power and domination, and willingness to break any rule and cause any amount of harm to reach their goals of total domination.

You couldn't see how it would be possible for these types of people to get to the top?

This has nothing to do with the proper role of government in our society, or the inherent incompetence of government (BTW, Rand claimed herself as an Objectivist not a libertarian) this has to do with the evil that some people possess, and their ability to use that evil to gain influential positions in the world. Regardless of what type of political or economic system we have, sociopaths would not disappear. Even if there was a major shift to the type of government you would like to have (I subscribe to that thought myself) you can bet that there would be plenty of psychopaths trying to their damnedest to hijack the movement for their own selfish goals (this tends to happen with pretty much every major movement)

Buddy Dink · Aug 17, 2009

How do you define such mental conditions? What thought process is necessary for someone to be a "sociopath" or "psychopath". What constitutes being crazy?

People who seek power I often times claim are crazy. The desire for control over other people is a mental condition.

420420420 · Aug 17, 2009

Buddy Dink said:

How do you define such mental conditions? What thought process is necessary for someone to be a "sociopath" or "psychopath". What constitutes being crazy?

People who seek power I often times claim are crazy....
Click to expand...

You may find this interesting:

Lovefraud.com > Key symptoms of a sociopath (psychopath, con artist)

TheHapiClam · Aug 17, 2009

It is said that a reasonable man, will change their ideals, to fit in with their society.

And an unreasonable man, will try to change society, to fit in with their ideals.

Therefore, all social progress, is the product of unreasonable people.

I concur.

SpacedOut · Aug 17, 2009

Replace the word "Psychopath" in TC's post with "Jew" and you'll see something strait out of...nvm, I'm not going to be the one to evoke Godwin's law in this thread.

It's a common trait among people to blame the problems of society on outsiders. 100 years ago there was plenty of scientific proof that black people were less intelligent or that Jews were inherently greedy.

I'm not saying there are no psychopaths, but the notion of a global psychopath conspiracy, or the suggestion that anyone who's ever been in power and done something bad is a psychopath is laughable. Like Bernie Madoff, how do you know he was a psychopath? Maybe he was just greedy.

dolphingirl · Oct 6, 2009

[quote name='Kylesa']No one is saying there isn't psycopaths, but as I asserted, it's errantly irresponsible explanation of why our world is screwed up. There's a much better (By better I mean well-founded with research, facts, and empirical evidence) philosophy of why our world (More specifically, our Government(s)) are screwed up. It has to do with the proliferation of 'progressive' ideals, when history and logic rightly confirm that economic and personal freedom are what keeps individuals free from some of the plights you listed above.

This has been well-founded with research, facts and the empirical evidence points to the fact this is a genetic disorder.

UnbyJP · Oct 6, 2009

dolphingirl said:

This has been well-founded with research, facts and the empirical evidence points to the fact this is a genetic disorder.
Click to expand...

There is very little, if anything, well-founded in the fields of biology, medicine, and most of all mental disorders.

letsgetPOD · Oct 6, 2009

The ruling bloodlines are psychopaths, the Darwins and the wedgewoods were too, is it too much inbreeding? You only need to read The Next Million Years, to figure that out. These people are about control, eugenics, special breeds for certain jobs, they are CRAZY! One thing is certain the very few who rule the world are pshycopaths and control freeks playing God wit humanity, and they groom presidents and dictators to do their bidding.

Forums

Nothing will change until we recognize the predators in our midst - Psychopaths

Troy McLure Guest

Kylesa Guest

SpacedOut Registered User

420420420 Freedumb
Old School

UnbyJP Vaping since '08

Troy McLure Guest

Kylesa Guest

Troy McLure Guest

Kylesa Guest

Troy McLure Guest

maxrule keeper of the faith

420420420 Freedumb
Old School

Buddy Dink Very Expensive

420420420 Freedumb
Old School

TheHapiClam Enhanced Male Member!

SpacedOut Registered User

dolphingirl Registered User

UnbyJP Vaping since '08

letsgetPOD Guest

Share This Page

Network

Forums

Help

Find Us On

Useful Searches

Nothing will change until we recognize the predators in our midst - Psychopaths

Troy McLure Guest

Kylesa Guest

SpacedOut Registered User

420420420 Freedumb Old School

UnbyJP Vaping since &#39;08

Troy McLure Guest

Kylesa Guest

Troy McLure Guest

Kylesa Guest

Troy McLure Guest

maxrule keeper of the faith

420420420 Freedumb Old School

Buddy Dink Very Expensive

420420420 Freedumb Old School

TheHapiClam Enhanced Male Member!

SpacedOut Registered User

dolphingirl Registered User

UnbyJP Vaping since &#39;08

letsgetPOD Guest

Share This Page

420420420 Freedumb
Old School

UnbyJP Vaping since '08

420420420 Freedumb
Old School

420420420 Freedumb
Old School

UnbyJP Vaping since '08