What if mushrooms break down otherwise non-biodegradable matter? it's already been proven essentially, with plastic diapers, poop, and more. Anyway, what if we replaced diapers with spent fuel rods? So in other words, use the fuel rod material as a substrate for mushrooms. If you peed on it, you would quickly find out right? Wrong, because would catch on fire immediately; fuel rods need to be kept cool constantly by cooled liquid. My theory: what if we replaced an enormous amount of cooling water with cooled urine? a TON of cooled urine, to run out for a while. The urine would oxidize/break down/disassemble the metals a bit, "biodegrade" it gradually, into the urine stream. But the metal didnt actually disappear; it's still in the urine. But NOW, the metal can be used as a suitable substrate!!!! Mushrooms would probably automatically grow from the urine waste outside the reactor, into tons of fungus; many that grow with radiation energy, likely even growing green! All in all, this would essentially de-atomize, disassemble, reset the failed matter that is nuclear waste and turn it back into usable matter in a very quick amount of time. Thoughts?
You can improve soil and radiation with mushrooms, but i dont know about on that scale. It certainly wouldnt be a quick fix by any means, but it isnt a bad thought.
Why the fuck would they build a nuclear facility beside the sea anyway? Clearly was a accident waiting to happen.
Or we could stop continuing to blow this out of proportion almost three years after this "disaster" happened. ... Just a thought.
you know whats cool, dead sea animals washing up on shore. Hmm how does this happen. Personally i believe the radiation is still moving in the ocean. I wouldn't buy tuna from japan....im just saying.
Eh do doesn't sound like an amazing idea. Sounds like random stuff tossed together. Sent from my iPad using Grasscity Forum mobile app
are you crazy you know there is a shit load of radiation still leaking out. Most of America is to dumbed down what that equals I will stop here before I make you think to hard.
There are a lot of legit solutions that don't involve shrooms. It seems that using a liquid under normal pressure and conditions would work a lot better than the designs we use today which is basically fighting to keep the system from NOT blowing up. Thorium has been regarded by many to be the best possible alternate nuclear energy source. It would have prevented Fukushima and would have produced far less waste than we have using uranium. I suggest you read up on Thorium, to me its very interesting.
The problem at Fukushima can be fixed. For every problem there is a solution. However, when you have very disgusting and evil entities behind the veil planning and executing the destruction of worlds, there is nothing that can be done because they will execute their plans no matter what. Fukushima's disaster is man made 100%.
Fukushima meltÂdown is warnÂing to the world, says nuÂclear plant opÂerÂaÂtor... U.S. SecÂreÂtary of EnÂergy Ernest Moniz and Tokyo ElecÂtric Power Co PresÂiÂdent Naomi HiÂrose wearÂing proÂtecÂtive suits as they inÂspect TEPCO's Fukushima DaiÂichi nuÂclear power plant. Photo: REUTERS/Tokyo ElecÂtric Power Co The man in charge of Japan's cripÂpled Fukushima DaiÂichi nuÂclear plant has warned that the meltÂdown of the plant in 2011 conÂtains imÂporÂtant lessons for the British govÂernÂment and its plans to build new nuÂclear power staÂtions. Naomi HiÂrose, presÂiÂdent of the comÂpany that runs Fukushima, Tokyo ElecÂtric Power ComÂpany (Tepco), said the triple meltÂdown folÂlowÂing the earthÂquake and tsunami in Japan was a “warnÂing to the world†and that Britain's nuÂclear inÂdusÂtry must be “preÂpared for the worstâ€. SpeakÂing to the Guardian, he said that deÂspite what the nuÂclear inÂdusÂtry and the pubÂlic wanted to beÂlieve, nuÂclear power was not 100 per cent safe. "But we have to exÂplain, no matÂter how small a posÂsiÂbilÂity, what if this [safety] barÂrier is broÂken? We have to preÂpare a plan if someÂthing hapÂpens … It is easy to say this is alÂmost perÂfect so we don't have to worry about it. But we have to keep thinkÂing: what if …" he told the paper.