In modern society it is often we take for granted the importance of scientific endevers. Currently whats vastly unknown to the general public yet proposes very drastic changes is the Higgs boson. This particular boson's exsistance prompts a large scientific as well as political change that has every phycists guessing on the reprocutions. While the future of partical physics is uncertain the current events surrounding the Higgs offers many signs to be concerned with it. The future is about to change drastically and it's important for anyone to know a significant portion of why that is. Take away everything you know about atoms and think of them as a simple glass of sugar water. Outwardly, you can look at your glass of sugar water and think it is nothing more then just a glass of water untill you taste it. It is the same as an atom but instead of just tasting the sugar we experience the sugars effects everywhare and in everything. Essentially a boson is the most elementry partical (smallest) and in our water model it is the sugar. Bosons are the physical forms of the universal forces, instead of electro magnetism or gravity our boson is what makes the water sweet. Though they are invisable without a microscope they exsist everywhere and create the effects we can observe. The diffrence between sugar water and a boson is really nothing more then size and of course bosons played an essentail role in the big bang. “The God Partical†is a name no scientists likes yet cant argue with, the name was coined by an unknown journalist and the name truly says it all. The Higgs is theoretical and is predicted to exsist by the standard model. The universe you and I live in is incredable on the quantum scale, there is virtually nothing holding anything together. Atoms come and go from one end of the galaxy to the other in less then a second. Everything between an atomic neucleous and it's electrons is mostly nothing even further are other atoms. Everything you know is nothing more then a wave of light streaming from the 10th dimension of which is where infinate probabilities exsist simultaneously within a singularity. Think of it as collage, you start at the 10th dimension (first semester) and everyone you know from high school is there all having different majors. Then theres the 9th dimension (second semeser) a few of them weed themselves out and get jobs at mcdonalds. As we stream down further to our third dimension (when you get a masters degree) all the possible doctors, lawyers, and english teachers have taken jobs on a oil rig in some country no one's ever hear of; while you are working within your career. Congratulatins you have been selected by the higgs boson to physically exsist in our universe. Atleast that is essiantailly M-theory and Super String theory, though think of that oil rigg and mcdonalds as parralel universes. As if that wasn't complicated enough, What keeps you from completely loosing your career the same way atoms physically exsist? The answer would be mass. You've graduated from collage, you've found a stable company to work for, you stay there for 2 years or so and build up a nice resume. The Higgs in this role is your resume and work ethic, that's what will give you the basic staying power for any employer to want to hire you for the rest of your life, it is your mass. If it wasn't for mass in the universe all physical matter would disapate into nothing more then wondering protons and electrons constantly repealing each other. Everything would revert back to the first billion years of the universe that is basiclly nothing but a big black void. In a career model lets just say you lost your mind and ended up having to stay at a psychward for a few years thinking you're a glass of orange juice. No one is going to hire a delusional idiot possibly on a permanent acid trip. Because the Higgs is the boson of mass, it combines all the factors of the standard model to create cohesion and stability to the universe within a certain degree of predictability according to the standard model and the theory of everything. The question of “what are atoms made of†is very inconclusive and exspensive as is the history of the quest for higgs. In Geneva Switerland September 29, 1954 The European union opened a 16.77 mile circumfrenced particle accelerator in hopes to smash atoms together at 99.99% the speed of light to observe what atoms are made of. Later In Batavia, IL November 21, 1967 the United State Government opened Fermi lab in hopes to smash atoms together in a 3.9 mile circumfrenced particle accelerator. With CERN's discovery of subatomic particals, along with many theories surrounding them, It was proposed in 1962 by Phillip Warran Anderson that there must be something creating mass in the universe. It was because of this theory the Big Bang theory began to get attention, it was otherwise discarded. Fermi Lab and CERN began searching speciffically for Higgs sometime in the mid 1980's. Though both labs were technically competitors they made it a point to work together in the quest for Higgs. As scientific theory progressed to what we know today the need to find the Higgs became much more apparent. If mass dose not exist every major scientific theory made with in the last 80 years would be destroyed, and it all rested safely in the assumption this tiny little thing exsisted. With the recession getting worse, budget cuts, and upcomming election year Fermi Lab was informed they have there funding cut completely by the United States Congress in September 2011. After 30 years of searching and trillions upon trillions of wasted tax dollars with little to show, Fermi Lab turned off its power, relocated there employees to other labs, and locked the doors. CERN also felt the effects of a tough economic time and is schedualed to close in September 2012. Currently the heat is all on CERN, If they can not find the Higgs all of science will have to change indefinently. The directors at CERN are needless to say desperate though pesitimistic. Since the Higgs has a very narrow amount of size it can exsist in, of which has to be distinct from other particles (meaning they cant just find a random particle and say “Oh that's it!!!â€), CERN expects a 95% chance of coming up with nothing. The standard model is currently in threat. The future of Higgs and science is on very shakey grounds and can go in so many directions very quickly. If Higgs is to survive the future it will have to do what NASA is doing and that is privateize their funding. Unfourtunately a hundred billion dollar particle accelerator that can smash atoms forever with very little to offer and no monetary payout is hard to sell to an investor. You could say, currently the alligators in the scientific community are crawling to save there careers. Dismal as it may seem it is ironic, as the amount of arrogence scientists have perpetuated is falling back on them based on a tiny sub atomic partical. They built theory based on theories which were origionally based on improvable hypothesis to begin with, (which means a ton of bull shit) and boasted that they did so on virtually any scientific documentary with billions of federal dollars. It's interesting to watch on the news how suddenly CERN keeps changing the expected size of Higgs boson since they've received notice of there budget cut. Keeping in mind for nearly 50 years they boasted it could only be a certain size to be calculated within the standard model, it surprising no one has accused them of not knowing anything to begin with. Major physists agree if the Higgs can not be found they may be able to tweek a theory of everything proposed in the 1970's called “Technicolor Theoryâ€. Meanwhile so many formal scientific institutions are getting the axe, several “New Age†scientific fields are getting a whooping estimate of $48 billion a year from book sales, private investors, the U.N. and many major governments; and is expected to grow annually. This movement could easily turn science into a new religeon. Society as we know it is bound to change drastically with this sort of mix in events over the next 20-30 years. Politics and science are very much influenced by each other with in any society. What makes the Higgs important isnt that it exsists or not, as anyone can guess the universe will still function without it, rather the future it proposes either way for us. The federal government has made it very clear they are tired of throwing money into things that serves no purpose and nobody cares about. Higgs boson was just one example, NASA's mars rovers are another, soho, the space shuttle, many things were weeded out of the American scientific community last year. This combined with the president putting China and India in the seats with the world powers at the U.N. along with China and India providing better career options for P.H.D graduates shifts the role of science into Asia full swing. This concerns Physicists as history in WW2 has shown dictatorships tend to make science conform to their governments views of rather then factual information. The trend of steeling scientists in this matter has been seen before here in America.The strength of America that made us a world power, is the United States government would steel the best scientists from other countries. We did this with the Nazi's during WW2 and in gaining Einstien from Hitler the famous E=mc2 gave us the ability to create the atomic bomb. However much war is seen as a bad thing it's important to have the biggest bomb because diplomacy tends to only happen when two angry countries have collateral on each other. Due to lack of concern of the people and high price tag we are chasing our science graduates out of the country. With the Chinese government's obsesive lust for complete control to even go as far as claim they will name the next Dali Lama, It says a great deal what's in store for the scientific future. This is a government that historically has little concern for human life and frequently misuses science much like the Nazis did except on a massive scales. A recent example of Chinas worst use of scince is the late 60's during the [FONT="]Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution. Chairman Mao had a great deal of resistance by the people as his party (funded by a Chinese mafia) wanted to turn china into a communist country while the people wanted a democracy. To make an example of some rebel groups, Mao ordered a city with a population of 74 million people to poison the water. 64 million people were killed quickly, the other 10 million remaing were later gased with mustard gas or shot by their own military whom they thought would protect them. Though Mao has been held accountable for his crimes against humanity by the U.N., the current government has not become much better. The U.N. consistantly has to make China take humain population control methods though they are severaly over populated. If the shaky foundations of science fall into the hands of politics such as these combined with making them a decision maker in the U.N. you can bet your butt we are in trouble. What ever is to come for our scientific future, as always, it is sure to be the resault of who's in charge of it's scientists as well as the leading political intrests with in a dictatorship government.[/FONT] [FONT="]In this essay I have provided the reader with insights of the importance of the higgs boson. Discussed was what bosons are, what the higgs boson is, a brief execution of the standard model, and the politics sourronding all of it. While anyone can only speculate what the future holds for science as well as the answers for the big questions, it is clear to see we are undergoing many major changes as a resault of a subatomic particle. Inconclusion, the importance of knowing current events such as this is invaluable.[/FONT]
I don't know what you're looking for by posting that here, but I can tell you after glancing over it briefly that it's riddled with errors. Read it aloud to yourself and start proofreading.
Edit: After struggling through it, I'm still not sure what your point is. It's also full of contrived, nonsensical analogies, unsupported assertions, and misinformation (e.g. CERN didn't discover subatomic particles and Einstein's energy-mass equivalence was certainly not necessary for the development of atomic weapons, amongst other things). Not to mention, you have no sources. There is really nothing about your paper that indicates any level of actual scientific literacy or knowledge of academic writing.
I think you're trying too hard to make the paper sound smart, but it just ends up fucking up your sentence structures with lack of grammar and punctuation. Please for the love of god, teach yourself how to use commas properly.
As I was trying to scroll to the bottom as fast as possible I picked out the word weed from your essay and I was like wtf maybe I should read it. I shouldn't have read it.
On a serious note: spell check that shit, don't say things like "it is often that we" say "we often" unless you really just need to take up space, and don't end with" in conclusion " that is elementary shit. Good luck on your paper man!
I truly hope you're trolling It sure is, for anyone who wants to sound like a complete imbecile every time they touch pen to paper
You dont need to use perfect grammar and spelling to be intelligent. Thats why I think English is pointless. If you look at how people speak orally it would translate weird into words, but you can understand someone better a lot more through speaking then writing. For how much emphasis is put on English, its not that important
I'm just going to stop right there There's no way I'm seriously going to critique a paper on advanced physics written by someone that can't spell simple words. I have trouble believing someone could truly grasp that subject and still leave their paper riddled with errors. Even if you're a poor speller you have to know that word processors have spell check.
However, if one wants to be taken seriously, proper spelling and grammar certainly helps. Much of my job centers around preparing reports for various government agencies—if I were to submit something riddled with errors: A. No one would read it. B. My credibility would be called into question. C. I'd likely lose my job. Spelling and grammar aside, most of this is unintelligible; there are portions that make absolutely no sense whatsoever.