Lets start a new political party in Canada

Discussion in 'Philosophy' started by HighGrowMan, Mar 24, 2011.

  1. #1 HighGrowMan, Mar 24, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 24, 2011
    Seriously. The qualification is that you need to be a 'worker' and have no agenda. By that I mean you don't plan on doing anything in office.

    The orientation would social anarchism, or doing whatever we can to bring things together; building connections between our nation and other nations, building connections between us and the people and doing whatever is possible to remove tax that does not provide service, as well as allowing people to choose the tax that they would like.

    Example, have a website that allows people to customize their income tax portfolio. If one wants pension, contribute to pension, if one wants employment insurance, then contribute to employment insurance and so on and so forth.

    Options of things that would not be allowed would be things that would interfere with other people or nations. Contributing to a military would not be allowed. Contributing to maintain the social anarchism would also be optional. A 5% option would be suggested, however if the country chose not to support that, then government assets would be liquidated. bills would have to have levels of support required to bump them to the next level. It would kind of be like facebook. A bill would have to receive a good share of 'likes' before it is given educated review, and then open public debate.

    Options of things that would be 'on the table' would be funding social projects that are not violent against people or nature. For example library's, universities and so on; however everything funded with public money would be available to everyone, so universities would not be free, just funded. Hospitals as well. If you don't want to pay for your medical expenses get health insurance. If you want health insurance to be available for who have no money, pay to the social program that helps people pay for their hospital visits, or steps in to prevent bills from giving undue suffering.

    Basically, the government would act like an extension of the consciousness of the people, but have no real say as to what goes on at all. Laws would be changed and in-acted in parliament for legal reasons, but a majority would allow the bills to be in-acted nearly automatically with the bill going from the people to law in the form it was drafted, as more of a safe guard against computer hacking and tyranny by the anarchy party leader.

    Any one in?
     

Share This Page