is this real

Discussion in 'Advanced Growing Techniques' started by egh22aeg, Jun 6, 2009.

  1. Oakdale, CA: Scientists at Montsaint Genie Tech Inc. announced today that they have successfully transferred the gene segment that produces the psychotropic chemical THC in cannabis plants to many other common garden plants, including tomatoes, cucumbers, lettuce, carrots, and more.

    “We probably can put the THC segment into almost any plant in existence,” says lead scientist Rebeca Vale. “It's a very simple process. We are starting work on oak and maple trees now.”

    Asked if the resulting plants could be used in ways similar to cannabis, Vale replied, “Well, you can't make twine out of a tomato plant, but if someone were to dry it and smoke it, all of the medicinal and psychotropic effects of marijuana would be present. And what's more, we have learned that tomatoes, in particular, actually produce more THC than cannabis itself.”

    But is it legal? “Actually, yes,” says Vale. “Our research qualifies as GMO ‘intellectual property', as does the process itself. Since tomatoes and other plants are not illegal, a person would be well within the law to grow them and use them as they please.”

    Vale says that her company is working on a spray that will transfer the segment to many plants simply by spraying the leaves of seedlings.

    “It's a very simple process,” she says. “Anyone can do it. We plan to start selling the spray - ‘Genie Mist' - in a matter of weeks. One bottle will sell for five dollars and be capable of treating 6,000 seedlings.”

    But how do the tomatoes taste? “Scrumptious,” Vale says. “But, of course, they are best when roasted.”




    I saw this article and I am not sure if this is possible or a scam please let me know what you think. sorry if its a repost I didnt see anything about it
     
  2. How do you smoke a tomato?
     
  3. fuck i hope its real

    i been thinking bout this since i seen the movie Homegrown and they where talking about putting THC in wheat
     
  4. if this stuff worked and is real I would seriously buy like 100 bottles of it before it gets made illegal
     
  5. I wonder if you could eat the tomatos? or if they needed heat to convert to thc? How does it form? Trichomes on the fruit?
     

  6. yea i was thinking that too
     
  7. how is this gonna be legal, i thought thc in general was illegal?
     
  8. y'all are fuckin retarded:smoking:.:bongin::smoking:
     
  9. theres allready a thread on this in the MJ News forum..... yea, it explains everything
     
  10. You got a link sir?
     
  11. haha :rolleyes:
     
  12. Sounds to good to be true... :confused:

    Honestly its probally possible but its still years away from actually happening. Its probaly only a theory.
     

  13. Very carefully
     

  14. Granted, I think this may be a marketing exploit that I think is probably bullshit... (I hope it's real............... but my point is... THC possesion is not illegal, marijuana possesion is.


    SO...
     

  15. OK... then a link may be helpful...
     
  16. Didn't Homer Simpson cross a tomato with a tobacco plant? Tomacco I believe it was called:)
     


  17. what?!?! can't search G.C. yourself....

    ok then just hit thelazy button.
     
  18. hahahaha wouldnt you eat a THC tomato to get high?

    i have read on the internet about this being done with citrus trees by some professor at a university in the east US. he started to ditribute the seeds free of charge to anyone who requested them.

    News
    \t \t\tA Florida Biochemist Designs a Citrus Tree with THC

    \t\t\t\t\t\t \t\t \t\t\t\t\t\tWed, Jan 30, 2008 9:52 pm
    \t\t\t\t\t\tmore: headline news
    \t\t\t\t\t
    \t\t\t\tsource: cannabisodling.1av10.nu
    \t\t\t\t
    \t\t \t\t\t\t \t\t In the summer of 1984, 10th-grader Irwin Nanofsky and a friend were driving down the Apalachee Parkway on the way home from baseball practice when they were pulled over by a police officer for a minor traffic infraction.

    After Nanofsky produced his driver's license the police officer asked permission to search the vehicle. In less than two minutes, the officer found a homemade pipe underneath the passenger's seat of the Ford Aerostar belonging to the teenage driver's parents. The minivan was seized, and the two youths were taken into custody on suspicion of drug possession.

    Illegal possession of drug paraphernalia ranks second only to open container violations on the crime blotter of this Florida college town. And yet the routine arrest of 16 year-old Nanofsky and the seizure of his family's minivan would inspire one of the most controversial drug-related scientific discoveries of the century.

    Meet Hugo Nanofsky, biochemist, Florida State University tenured professor, and the parental authority who posted bail for Irwin Nanofsky the night of July 8, 1984. The elder Nanofsky wasn't pleased that his son had been arrested for possession of drug paraphernalia, and he became livid when Tallahassee police informed him that the Aerostar minivan would be permanently remanded to police custody.

    Over the course of the next three weeks, Nanofsky penned dozens of irate letters to the local police chief, the Tallahassee City Council, the State District Attorney and, finally, even to area newspapers. But it was all to no avail.

    Under advisement of the family lawyer, Irwin Nanofsky pled guilty to possession of drug paraphernalia in order to receive a suspended sentence and have his juvenile court record sealed. But in doing so, the family minivan became "an accessory to the crime." According to Florida State law, it also became the property of the Tallahassee Police Department Drug Task Force. In time, the adult Nanofsky would learn that there was nothing he could do legally to wrest the vehicle from the hands of the state.

    It was in the fall of 1984 that John Chapman Professor of Biochemistry at Florida State University, now driving to work behind the wheel of a used Pontiac Bonneville, first set on a pet project that he hoped would "dissolve irrational legislation with a solid dose of reason." Nanofsky knew he would never get his family's car back, but he had plans to make sure that no one else would be pulled through the gears of what he considers a Kafka-esque drug enforcement bureaucracy.

    "It's quite simple, really," Nanofsky explains, "I wanted to combine Citrus sinesis with Delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol." In layman's terms, the respected college professor proposed to grow oranges that would contain THC, the active ingredient in marijuana. Fourteen years later, that project is complete, and Nanofsky has succeeded where his letter writing campaign of yore failed: he has the undivided attention of the nation's top drug enforcement agencies, political figures, and media outlets.

    The turning point in the Nanofsky saga came when the straight-laced professor posted a message to Internet newsgroups announcing that he was offering "cannabis-equivalent orange tree seeds" at no cost via the U.S. mail. Several weeks later, U.S. Justice Department officials showed up at the mailing address used in the Internet announcement: a tiny office on the second floor of the Dittmer Laboratory of Chemistry building on the FSU campus. There they would wait for another 40 minutes before Prof. Nanofsky finished delivering a lecture to graduate students on his recent research into the "cis-trans photoisomerization of olefins."

    "I knew it was only a matter of time before someone sent me more than just a self-addressed stamped envelope," Nanofsky quips, "but I was surprised to see Janet Reno's special assistant at my door." After a series of closed door discussions, Nanofsky agreed to cease distribution of the THC-orange seeds until the legal status of the possibly narcotic plant species is established.

    Much to the chagrin of authorities, the effort to regulate Nanofsky's invention may be too little too late. Several hundred packets containing 40 to 50 seeds each have already been sent to those who've requested them, and Nanofsky is not obliged to produce his mailing records. Under current law, no crime has been committed and it is unlikely that charges will be brought against the fruit's inventor.

    Now it is federal authorities who must confront the nation's unwieldy body of inconsistent drug laws. According to a source at the Drug Enforcement Agency, it may be months if not years before all the issues involved are sorted out, leaving a gaping hole in U.S. drug policy in the meantime. At the heart of the confusion is the fact that THC now naturally occurs in a new species of citrus fruit.

    As policy analysts and hemp advocates alike have been quick to point out, the apparent legality (for now) of Nanofsky's "pot orange" may render debates over the legalization of marijuana moot. In fact, Florida's top law enforcement officials admit that even if the cultivation of Nanofsky's orange were to be outlawed, it would be exceedingly difficult to identify the presence of outlawed fruit among the state's largest agricultural crop.

    Amidst all of the hubbub surrounding his father's experiment, Irwin Nanofsky exudes calm indifference. Now 30-years-old and a successful environmental photographer, the younger Nanofsky can't understand what all of the fuss is about. "My dad's a chemist. He makes polymers. I doubt it ever crossed his mind that as a result of his work tomorrow's kids will be able to get high off of half an orange."
     

Share This Page