Hi guys! Is this mold on my weed or no?

I'll need much more for a proper analysis. send it overnight if you please. I can't tell from that pic.

 

I don't see any mold and I would smoke it. Not very pretty, but I've learned not to go by appearance alone.
Enjoy
Welcome to Grasscity @grsour !

 

Hard to tell from that picture. I look for mold with a loupe and it can be tricky to see as the tricomes can look very similar to mold. If you see something that looks like cotton or tricomes without the round heads, it could be mold. It's easier to see if you have a bad case of mold, but a little spot here and there can be very hard to see.

If it smells rotten or like a damp basement, that can be a clue too..

I read a black light will show mold, I'll have to try this. (or use a microscope)..

 

UV-C lighting/and or a micro wave oven kills fungi

 

dip a sample in bleach then dip again to wash of the bleach

if it turn to snot in 30secs its fungi let it dry and pick it off

good luck

 

but it doesn't destroy aflaxtoxins.

 

https://www.nature.com › articles › s41598-020-70370-x
Performance of a UV-A LED system for degradation of aflatoxins B1 and ...
Dominant sources of UV treatment such as low pressure and medium pressure mercury lamps were used to degrade aflatoxins. In a study, 98% reduction of AFB 1 in water was observed at an UV dose...

 

I'm not sure that killing it makes it safe to smoke. From what I've heard, that's a no. I've also heard that you cant make edibles from moldy weed either, you can still get sick. I wouldnt gamble with moldy weed, just toss it in the trash and get some good weed.

Whats the worse that can happen? You will need surgery to remove the mold from your lungs. Its not an easy operation and one you dont want to go through.

 

I don't see any mold.

 

doh! lol good find. I usually hit my crops with the UVC for ~30min when they are hanging to dry. I do the same the next day; so it's nice to see this.

 

Once the aflatoxins have been destroyed they no longer toxic.
Only Fungi i have had issues with is PM, now I know how to control PM its not issue.
If I didnt have allot of moldy weed it would get tossed.
Allot of weed i would make into bubble hash.
I use hydrogen peroxide when I make bubble hash. Hydrogen peroxide kills Fungi and insect egg larva;........
To smoke moldy weed is up to the person who has it. Its not for me
I have allot of weed, none is moldy ..
I do have a 25watt UV-C light ,, same as welding , one stage/level under Xray .
The Light kill everything single celled. MJ plant leaf's, Insect egg larva, the skin on your arms, and any animals eye balls.

To make canna butter or oil your heating the weed to 170 f for 20 to 40 minutes anyway.
Then your cooking the buds in a slow cooker for hours .


Yes I think its possible to kill mold spores,, as of aflatoxins yes that to.

I would use it for bubble hash.. if you had 10 or 15 pounds or more.

 

I will post this, it is interesting .
UV Lights and Lamps: Ultraviolet-C Radiation, Disinfection, and Coronavirus

• Share
• Tweet
• Linkedin
• Email
• Ultraviolet Radiation and SARS-COV-2 Coronavirus
• FDA and EPA Regulation of UVC Lamps

Related page:

• Ultraviolet (UV) Radiation

[paste:font size="5"]Far-UVC light (222 nm) efficiently and safely inactivates airborne human coronavirusesExternal Link Disclaimer). UVC radiation may also be effective in inactivating the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which is the virus that causes the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). For more information see "Q: Where can I read more about UV radiation and disinfection?". However, currently there is limited published data about the wavelength, dose, and duration of UVC radiation required to inactivate the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

In addition to understanding whether UVC radiation is effective at inactivating a particular virus, there are also limitations to how effective UVC radiation can be at inactivating viruses, generally.

• Direct exposure: UVC radiation can only inactivate a virus if the virus is directly exposed to the radiation. Therefore, the inactivation of viruses on surfaces may not be effective due to blocking of the UV radiation by soil, such as dust, or other contaminants such as bodily fluids.
• Dose and duration: Many of the UVC lamps sold for home use are of low dose, so it may take longer exposure to a given surface area to potentially provide effective inactivation of a bacteria or virus.

UVC radiation is commonly used inside air ducts to disinfect the air. This is the safest way to employ UVC radiation because direct UVC exposure to human skin or eyes may cause injuries, and installation of UVC within an air duct is less likely to cause exposure to skin and eyes.

There have been reports of skin and eye burns resulting from improper installation of UVC lamps in rooms that humans can occupy.

Q: Can UVB or UVA radiation inactivate the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus?

A: UVB and UVA radiation is expected to be less effective than UVC radiation at inactivating the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus.

• UVB: There is some evidence that UVB radiation is effective at inactivating other SARS viruses (not SARS-CoV-2). However, it is less effective than UVC at doing so and is more hazardous to humans than UVC radiation because UVB radiation can penetrate deeper into the skin and eye. UVB is known to cause DNA damage and is a risk factor in developing skin cancer and cataracts.
• UVA: UVA radiation is less hazardous than UVB radiation but is also significantly (approximately 1000 times) less effective than either UVB or UVC radiation at inactivating other SARS viruses. UVA is also implicated in skin aging and risk of skin cancer.

Q: Is it safe to use a UVC lamp for disinfection purposes at home?

A: Consider both the risks of UVC lamps to people and objects and the risk of incomplete inactivation of virus.

Risks: UVC lamps used for disinfection purposes may pose potential health and safety risks depending on the UVC wavelength, dose, and duration of radiation exposure. The risk may increase if the unit is not installed properly or used by untrained individuals.

• Direct exposure of skin and eyes to UVC radiation from some UVC lamps may cause painful eye injury and burn-like skin reactions. Never look directly at a UVC lamp source, even briefly. If you have experienced an injury associated with using a UVC lamp, we encourage you to report it to the FDA.
• Some UVC lamps generate ozone. Ozone inhalation can be irritating to the airway.
• UVC can degrade certain materials, such as plastic, polymers, and dyed textile.
• Some UVC lamps contain mercury. Because mercury is toxic even in small amounts, extreme caution is needed in cleaning a lamp that has broken and in disposing of the lamp.

Effectiveness: The effectiveness of UVC lamps in inactivating the SARS-CoV-2 virus is unknown because there is limited published data about the wavelength, dose, and duration of UVC radiation required to inactivate the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It is important to recognize that, generally, UVC cannot inactivate a virus or bacterium if it is not directly exposed to UVC. In other words, the virus or bacterium will not be inactivated if it is covered by dust or soil, embedded in porous surface or on the underside of a surface.

To learn more about a specific UVC lamp, you may want to:

• Ask the manufacturer about the product’s health and safety risks and about the availability of instructions for use/training information.
• Ask whether the product generates ozone.
• Ask what kind of material is compatible with UVC disinfection.
• Ask whether the lamp contains mercury. This information may be helpful if the lamp is damaged and you need to know how to clean up and/or dispose of the lamp.

Q: Are all lamps that produce UVC radiation the same?

Not all UVC lamps are the same. Lamps may emit very specific UVC wavelengths (like 254 nm or 222 nm), or they may emit a broad range of UV wavelengths. Some lamps also emit visible and infrared radiation. The wavelengths emitted by the lamp may affect the lamp’s effectiveness at inactivating a virus and may impact the health and safety risks associated with the lamp. Some lamps emit multiple types of wavelengths. Testing of the lamp can determine whether, and how much, other wavelengths the lamp puts out.

There is some evidence that excimer lamps, with peak wavelength of 222-nm may cause less damage to the skin, eyes, and DNA than the 254 nm wavelength, but long-term safety data is lacking. For more information see "Q: Where can I read more about UV radiation and disinfection?".

Q: What are the different types of lamps that can produce UVC radiation?

Low-pressure mercury lamp: Historically, the most common type of lamp used to produce UVC radiation was the low-pressure mercury lamp, which has its main (>90%) emission at 254 nm. Other wavelengths are also produced by this type of lamp. There are other lamps available that emit a broad range of UV wavelengths, but also emit visible and infrared radiation.

Excimer lamp or Far-UVC lamp: Type of lamp, called an “excimer lamp”, with a peak emission of around 222 nm.

Pulsed xenon lamps: These lamps, which emit a short pulse of broad spectrum (including UV, visible and infrared) light have been filtered to emit mainly UVC radiation and are sometimes employed in hospital settings to treat environmental surfaces in operating rooms or other spaces. These are normally employed when no humans are occupying the space.

Light-emitting diodes (LEDs): Light-emitting diodes (LEDs) that produce UV radiation are also becoming more commonly available. Typically, LEDs emit a very narrow wavelength band of radiation. Currently available UV LEDs have peak wavelengths at 265 nm, 273 nm, and 280 nm, among others. One advantage of LEDs over low-pressure mercury lamps is that they contain no mercury. However, the small surface area and higher directionality of LEDs may make them less effective for germicidal applications.