Only her face is animated graphics, it's overlayed over actual video of the actress. Pretty good, but I don't believe it actually bridges the "uncanny valley" like they claim, but it's getting better. http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article4557935.ece
Not to them because they would lose money and then they can make the "fictional characters" do anything and they don't waste money.
Since when is CGI technology free? What about audio? Still going to have to pay those actors/folley artists.
I want the link to the video of a flying, pink elephant with neon green tentacles bangin 30 girls at once then.
Well Electricity is free, it comes from the wind and the flow of water. Ya you would have to pay the people who make it but it would be cheaper.
Holy god...I almost skipped it because I thought it was just a girl speaking then I read the description
Can I see your cost analysis? For example, a game with DX10 technology like Crysis cost $22 MILLION dollars to create. And that's not even close to achieving the pinnacle of photorealism. Some of the more skilled CGI animators have salaries topping $100,000 a year plus.