On September 26, 2002 Matthew Davis was placed to rest in peace at noon. On September 26, 2002 at noon Jackson had done something similar and also killed a motorbike cop, Mike Scofield, but was convicted with a nearly undetectable amount of THC Metabolite. Here is the biggest problem of them all: Because it is up to the invisible man to actually do some research to prove what "impaired" really is you simply lose. THey have "experts" who simply say that "they believe that you" could mearly be "impaired" as if good theory. But with that same exact level of intelligence and theory they could also imply that you could also not be impaired but they will not mention this latter part for that is up to you to pay your own expert to testify and say just such theory. No true research has been done. It is as if the "experts" are leaving it up to you, the public, to prove what is reality. Nanograms is a joke, it represents a ratio in billionths. Therefore, 4 nanograms/milliliter is really 0.000000004% by volume. Coincidentally, those selling joint formula use nanograms to make it sound like a huge number when really 5000 nanograms is not even noticeable for wellness products. So when your in court like Jackson what do you say and what are your qualifications to say so? Also, I am still waiting for Scofields motorbike buddy to fess up and say that he was going more than double the speed limit without sirens!!!! I believe that it is impossible to detect any THC Metabolite less than 2 nanograms. Be careful out there, court TV just announce another person DUI THC for pulling left in front of a motorcycle. When the other driver is going 95 MPH is hard to detect when is the right time to turn left. But when the police are chasing after a kid with stolen SUV who goes 85MPH and kills grandma turning left and sends her a block down only then will they not worry about DUI, both grandma and the kid.