DUI checkpoint violation of rights

Discussion in 'General' started by 1992xr2, Oct 9, 2011.

  1. [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTG5rWF_Uis&feature=related"]Raw video of checkpoint arrests - Released to the North County Times - YouTube[/ame]

    Cops break window and impound the car because two dudes won't roll down window all the way. WTF, man?
     
  2. cops rule the world. obey or die!
     
  3. ....

    Speechless ...
     
  4. Pieces of shit, of course this is why they're making it illegal in some states to records these fucks.
     
  5. what the fuck. speachless.


    the guy at the end said "this is my property officer" and the officer says, "well its mine now"

    what the fuck
     
  6. Americas #1 street gang.
     
  7. I can't stop watching this, over and over and over.
     

  8. The DEA are Americas #1 street gang.
     
  9. Those guys are pretty stupid
     
  10. Why didn't they just roll down their window, though? lol
     
  11. Exercising their rights.
     

  12. it was rolled down. the main problem i believe the officer had is that he wouldnt give him his i.d. which i believe is also legal to give id to officer. ive never been forced to show an id but just to tell my name. Although it might be different for driver. Then again he wasnt pulled over, going threw a sobriety checkpoint so i dont think he had to provide id.
     
  13. they are just dumb hes like i need to see your id...

    and he was being an ass
     

  14. the officer or the kid?

    the kid wasnt being an ass, there was no reasonable doubt that he was drunk or suspicion so he doesnt have to show them id. i believe he asked if they thought he was drunk and they said no.
     

  15. Yes, you are absolutely required to have a drivers license while driving. lol (Is that not obvious? :confused:) It's not an exercise of rights to not produce a license when pulled over; it's a blatant violation of the law, which will warrant legitimate legal action by the police. I can't watch the vid atm, but if that's the case, then the officers were justified in breaking the window as they could easily argue it was necessary to remove the suspect from the vehicle. :confused_2:
     
  16. Yeah. I think the people in the car were thinking of it as entrapment to get people who are not only drunk but by taking their IDs they can check for warrants and what not.
     

  17. You're required to produce your license, registration and proof of insurance regardless of being pulled over for driving drunk. lol It's a condition of driving, I believe.
     
  18. I may be wrong but don't you have to break the law before they can ask to see your license? They didn't violate any law here. They weren't pulled over they were just stopped at a checkpoint.
     

  19. Yeah, I'm pretty sure it's a condition of driving in my state that you will produce your license, registration, and proof of insurance regardless of the reason you were pulled over, hence "routine" traffic stops, which are 100% legal. :smoke:
     

  20. this is what i was thinking. i read the article and one of the kids was apart of a big group that is anti sobriety checkpoints so they deffinetly knew what they were talking about or dealing with.

    they kept asking are we being detained or are we free to go, handled it much like they would if they were walking, which leads me to think that you dont have to provide id right away in one, not sure though.

    im reading online that they cannot do anything unless they have probable cause. which in this case would lead to the cops wrong doing correct? there was no probable cause.
     

Share This Page