[SIZE=medium]Congress cites 9/11 Bush cover-up, demands Obama act[/SIZE] [SIZE=medium]Sunday, December 22nd, 2013 | Posted by Gordon Duff[/SIZE] [SIZE=medium]Two members of Congress, specially authorized to view documents on 9/11 censored under the personal authority of President Bush (43), have come away “absolutely shocked,†demanding immediate action. [/SIZE] [SIZE=medium]In accusations published yesterday by the leading Tea Party publication, Family Security Matters, Saudi Defense Minister and Intelligence chief Prince Bandar referred to as “Bandar Bush†in his Wikipedia biography for his close relationship with that family, was said to be the planner of 9/11.[/SIZE] [SIZE=medium]http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/12/22/congress-cites-911-bush-cover-up-demands-obama-act/[/SIZE] h,nh,j
Why would you post something from a garbage website like Veteranstoday.com? The content contributors on that site are paranoid, hate-mongering idiots. A quick look through their top stories reveals these gems: "1. Will U.S. Senate Crown Netanyahu Emperor?" "4. Hilltop Jews; Terrorists and Scumbags" "19. Turkish 'Conspiracy Theories' are True" "20. Top Ten Reasons why Sandy Hook was an Elaborate Hoax" It's like reading the fucking Onion. Also, this story appears to be patently horseshit. Could not find anything on it on any websites except other conspiracy websites. It hasn't been run in a real news publication.
It's lucky you are not the Lord. The Earth doesn't move around you and you can't force others to believe your opinion. Research before you say something. Here is somthing for you to read. [SIZE=medium]Quote, "Inside the Saudi 9/11 coverup[/SIZE] [SIZE=medium]By Paul Sperry December 15, 2013[/SIZE] [SIZE=medium]President Bush inexplicably censored 28 full pages of the 800-page report. Text isn't just blacked-out here and there in this critical-yet-missing middle section. The pages are completely blank, except for dotted lines where an estimated 7,200 words once stood (this story by comparison is about 1,000 words).[/SIZE] [SIZE=medium]A pair of lawmakers who recently read the redacted portion say they are “absolutely shocked†at the level of foreign state involvement in the attacks.[/SIZE] [SIZE=medium]http://nypost.com/2013/12/15/inside-the-saudi-911-coverup/[/SIZE] "
If your story is legit, find a credible source. That is all Wolf is saying. And the NYpost isn't much better.
We will have Obama look into some conspiracy stuff regarding Bush that way no one will notice the horrible things we're having Obama do! It's genius. Bitch Boy Clinton, get me a strawberry daiquiri.
http://jones.house.gov/press-release/jones-introduces-resolution-declassify-911-report Whatever the whole truth is, it is clear that the entire 9/11 report is only available to a small group who are forbidden from talking about it. Somewhat related news: Because it should be no surprise that who congressman Jones can't mention is Saudi officials...for starters. http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/12/19/us-usa-saudiarabia-sept-idUSBRE9BI0ZX20131219
Yeah, because our totally vulnerable government would never use nefarious means to gain more money and power right? Riiiigghhht? Pshhh!
[SIZE=12pt]Saudi won't follow US as it used to be. That's why they released this news to intimidate. If you dare to criticize, we'll charge you for "committing 911 attack".[/SIZE] [SIZE=12pt]It is not an attempt to reveal the 911 truth. It is just another dirty political trick of intimidation. And they play you fools, poor steeples. [/SIZE] ghn
So said credible sources helped Bush activated an unjust war. Do you still want us to believe the lie of WMD?
I don't want you to believe shit, you obviously believe enough on your own already. I never bought into the WMD to begin with. There is still a difference between sources that fail to inform properly and sources that exist by and for looney tunes.