What in gods name could possibly be wrong with contraception? You may ask after a long and tense reflection I've had I realized the answer. And you might be suprised at the truth but what can I say it's the truth. Sex is only sex to the extent that it participates in the "I do" of wedding vows. Is it ever permissible for a married couple to violate their weddin vows? We can rant and rave and resist all we like, but an integral part of "I do" is openness to children. Someone might respond: "a couple can be 'open to children' over the course of their marriage without each and every act of intercourse needing to be." but that makes as much sense as saying: "A couple can be 'faithful' to each othe over the course of their marriage without each and every act of intercourse needing to be with each other." if we can recognize the inconsistency in claiming a commitment to fidelity.... But not always, we should be able to recognize the inconsistency of claiming a commitment to being open to children... But not always. After comming to this conclusion blades it all started to sink in and make much sence. So I found a answer to this dilemma well atleast a few choices we can choose from: Option 1: you can claim that sex doesn't have to participate in the "I do" of wedding vows at all. Ok, then the logical conclusion is that it doesn't have to be with people who have exchanged wedding vows at all. In this view, sex has no real meaning whatsoever, other than the exchange, or even solitary experiance, of physical pleasure. This opens the door to the justification of any and every means to orgasm, whether by onself, between two people, between any number of people (whether opposite sex or same sex would be superfluous), or even with animals xD!!.. This ubfortunatly is the way our generation aka the contreceptive culture already thinks smh.. Option 2: we can change the definition of marriage to exclude "openness to children" but then that makes us the authors of marriage, rather than God and the definition of marriage becomes completly arbitrary. You want to have a "dissoluble marriage" just in case it doesn't work out? Sure, we can do that. You want to have an "open marriage" just in case you get bored with each other? Sure, you want to marry your same sex bf? Sure that can happen also. After all, if marriage intrinsically linked with procreation, why need it be between a man and a women? But this already how our contraceptive culture see things. is marriage contradicting itself? Or did our evolution change the way we see the bible? contraceptive wasent inveted to prevent pregnancy.. Something already existed for that and is called abstinance. After some thought it became clear that contraceptive was created to induldge sexual instinct contraceptive was our "need" for sex. Which then it becomes clear contraception turns sexual union from a prphetic act into just blasphemy!!!! Just a little read for you blades.