CIA and Vatican edit Wikipedia entries

Discussion in 'General' started by high as hell, Aug 21, 2007.


    A US hacker's homemade program to pinpoint origins of Wikipedia edits indicates that alterations to the popular online encyclopedia have come from the CIA and the Vatican.

    Virgil Griffith's "Wikiscanner" points to Central Intelligence Agency computers as the sources of nearly 300 edits to subjects including Iran's president, the Argentine navy, and China's nuclear arsenal.

    A CIA computer was the source of a whiny "Wahhhhh" inserted in a paragraph about Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's plans for the office.

    "While I cannot confirm whether any changes were made from CIA computers, the agency always expects its computer systems to be used responsibly," CIA spokesman George Little said in response to an AFP inquiry.

    Wikipedia is a communally refined Internet encyclopedia that taps into the "wisdom of the masses" by letting anyone make changes.

    Its founders believe people who know better will quickly correct inaccurate or misleading information.

    Griffith, a university graduate student and self-described hacker, says his software matches unique "IP" addresses of computers with Wikipedia records regarding which machines are used to make online edits.

    "I came up with the idea when I heard about Congressmen getting caught for whitewashing their Wikipedia pages," Griffith explains on his website.

    Most edits listed at Wikiscanner involve minor changes such as spelling. Some alterations involve removing unflattering information, adding facts or inserting insults.

    Wikiscanner's roster indicates a Vatican computer was used to remove references to evidence linking Ireland's Sinn Fein leader Gerry Adams to a decades-old double murder.

    Someone at the US Democratic Party's Congressional campaign committee changed a description of conservative radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh to replace "comedian" with "bigot" and dub his listeners "legally retarded."

    "We don't condone these sorts of activities and we take every precaution to insure our network is used in a responsible manner," committee spokesman Doug Thornell told AFP.

    A Republican Party computer purportedly was used after the US invasion of Iraq to change "occupying forces" to "liberating forces" in a Baath Party entry.

    A United Nations computer is identified as the source of an edit that calls a respected Italian journalist a promiscuous racist.

    Someone using a US Senate computer altered a profile of veteran White House reporter Helen Thomas to complain she "interrupts" and is annoying.

    An edit traced by Wikiscanner to the BBC changes causes of former prime minister Tony Blair's heart palpitations from strong coffee and vigorous gym workouts to vodka and exertion in a bedroom.

    Wikiscanner also identified a BBC computer as being used to change US president George W. Bush's middle name from "Walker" to "Wanker" at Wikipedia.

    A computer belonging to Reuters news service is listed as adding "mass murderer" to a Wikipedia description of Bush.

    Griffith said it appears common for political figures to "whitewash" entries by replacing negative adjectives with flattering ones and that corporations seem inclined to insert criticism of competitors.

    Politicians and corporations show similar tendencies to remove critical information, according to Griffith.

    Griffith still considers the collaborative open Wikipedia model reliable.

    "Overall -- especially for non-controversial topics -- Wikipedia already works," Griffith says on his website.

    "For controversial topics, Wikipedia can be made more reliable through techniques like this one ... to counteract vandalism and disinformation."

  2. Hilarious. I think we have all known that wikipedia was more of a propaganda outlet and insult storage facility than a legit encyclopedia. Thats what happens when you let us joe shmoes write history. How funny would it be when you boss comes into the room and tells you to slander the opponent on wikipedia before you take your lunch break. Im not sure if tis is awesome or terrible. I guess it depends on whether or not you agree with the edit.
  3. I read about this when it came out, and yeah - This is one of the many reason's most Universities (mine included) hate on Wikipedia. Sure, the idea is noble, but if you have the CIA editing article's?


    You'd think the two biggest representations of religion and justice in our society would have better things to do with their time other than trying to cover up their bullshit we're already aware of.
  4. lol wow, doesnt the CIA have better things to do than to try and fool people about shit we already know?

    gotta love those hackers tho, like the one in canada or maybe U.S. i cant remember, who found child porn on a CALI judges' computer

Share This Page