They do what the fuck they want becaue at that point in time that is what the fuck they want to do the most.
Exactly. Choice the problem. Choice the solution. If we understand choice in itself thats a massive gain of wisdom a book that never ends every step of the way. Why does choice become monumental or sacrificial? Or minuscule and unheard of?
Interesting you bring that up. How would one eliminate choice from his life? If someone makes decisions for that person sure but the individual chooses to listen to the speaker's guidance, the speaker being the one making choices from the individual. How would one be able to eliminate choice without either of these factors being a burden?
It would be impossible to eliminate choice, everything is a choice, eliminating choice is a choice. Choosing not to choose is a choice.
Why can't choice be both, or all? Choice in itself suggest multiple things, it entails that multiple things can become from it no?
Good question. Why would that be? Our spirit has intentions beyond this plane and our bodies are just gateways to this dimension like spaceships in hyper space while we're the tube or something coming in and out of light speed but we are the door and the key. The lock and key. Yet we are able to include choice in the matter and delay our inevitable conclusions. Why?
Cause pretty much everything, including choice, has polar effective qualities. Its like the glue that holds the concept together, cause if there was only a onesided side on things then we wouldn't really give it any fucking use with our human brain.. So people use these things, incl. choice, to its maximum, which is in a negative and a positive way, to give it a name. Amiright? I want a cookie for it..
So maybe is it our perception that requires change? Maybe if our perception was different there would be no need for choice.
Precisely. Two hungry men one slab of meat. Fight or flee. One wins and one loses. This is the way of life determined by the slab of meat. To share is to put one's well being aside for the moment to complete the task without interruptions. If these two hungry men were to share the slab of meat they would be half hungry without any injuries but they would have enough energy to form a hunting party to bring down bigger prey. See this perception goes beyond the primal instinct of satisfying one's immediate hunger and goes to straight to the immediate foresight of what might lie ahead. In travelling through thought and memory does it become a choice he makes to share and form the hunting party or is it the obvious conclusion devoid of choice as in choice isn't even and option it disintegrates within the radius of the abstraction. Our souls are naturally good and helping so does choice come into play when we choose to help someone or does choice come into play when we choose not to help someone. This is what I ultimately ask