Bongs are bad

Technically he's not wrong or making anything up. This is in fact what they teach at Oaksterdam and what the studies, you know with science and stuff, have shown. If anybody is "making things up" I would think it was your statistics that you have bolded. Although I'm not disagreeing with you, I don't believe you just looked at published research to pull those statistics you so helpfully bolded. So, good job with your post.

 

<3 Grav bongs
Saves soo much weed

 

Go do the research yourself genius. My figures are accurate within 5% for all the things I stated. Google is your friend. Don't be an idiot and post nonsense without knowing what you are talking about.

 

Also, for the record, the study only shows THC:Tar ratio and does not take into account other variables such as chemicals in the rolling papers and so on.

 

If you are referring to me, I know exactly what I'm talking about. I never claimed to be a genius and I couldn't possibly do the "research" myself since I don't have the funds nor the equipment to do so. What I am capable of is taking the imformation that is given to me and use it logically.

I even provided a link to the study for you so you don't even need to use google. See what a nice guy I am?

 

Whatever. I clean my bong daily.
​

 

Wow, your statistics are wrong AND your grammar is that of a five year old labradoodle? Go home, we don't need you here.

 

Hah, yeah. I'm pretty sure any combustible substance taken into your lungs is not good for you.

 

Everyone stfu, I dont care how I smoke weed as long as I get high its all good .

 

xD Hahaha nice one man. Oh, and to the starter of this thread...
Clicky.

 

personally i dont think joints are better. wasted smoke is going into the air at most times not as much as bongs.also i can get higher with the same amount from a bong than a joint i belive.

 

typically you'll get higher with the same amount of weed if you smoke it from a bong.

it doesn't really concern me though. i love my joints

 

I think a lot of you are not understanding what the OP is referring to, and it is amazing to me the amount of idiotic and useless posts that some people reply with just because they don't know how to keep an open mind about new information.

Regardless, here is a quote from the study the OP is referring to and to the one I linked earlier. Again, this is THC:Tar ratio and should be read and with an open mind and not just dismissed because it is not what all the cool kids are saying.

Honestly, I'll smoke it either way. I just find it intersting. I would love to actually hear some reasoned opinions instead of rubbish.

 

Perhaps in certain scenarios OP's point could be correct. The thc intake must have been measured by a machine; how else could it be objectively measured? I have read that bong water absorbs some thc. If a machine draws on a joint steadily w/o the pause a real smoker takes then perhaps more thc is taken in per a specified amount of mj. In real life though I don't think that a joint as smoked by a human gives more thc per volume of pot because of the pause a human makes at the peak of an inhale. At that time there is smoke & thc wafting into the air. I think depending on technique a bong gives a bigger hit of more dense, thc laden smoke & thus gets one higher faster than a joint. It does for me for sure.

 

why won't people consider his stats may be right? I thought stoners were open minded.

Hmm I think more information is needed. If oakster stats are right them I would like to know the temp of the water in the bong or perhaps the type rolling papers (hemp or zig zagz for instance), that may affect results. idk,

really does it matter no, if you like bongs you're going to keep using them. every method of smoking has pros and cons health related. (exept vape i think)

 

bongs are good.