Bin Laden's son-in-law arrested

Discussion in 'Politics' started by garrison68, Mar 8, 2013.

  1. They should have sent him to GITMO, rather than sent to New York City, or elsewhere in the U.S., to face charges of terrorism.


    Bin Laden son-in-law arrested, whisked to NYC on terror charges - World News

    From the above article:


     
  2. Where have you been
     
  3. Oh good. I feel safe now...
     
  4. he was hiding from Bin Laden's son in law..

    and now that it's safe, here he is.

    Didn't read the article.. but besides for being Osama's son in law.. what did he get arrested for?
     
  5. and c'mon garrison..

    Bin Laden was so 2001..
     
  6. Duh, plotting to kill americans!
     
  7. Should have just droned him, why even bother with a trial.
     
  8. 9/11 was an inside job
     

  9. Did you even read the article? He was in Jordan, and we haven't declared war there yet. ;)


    :p
     

  10. We supposedly killed his father in Pakistan. A country we are not at war with.
     
  11. #15 TheDankery, Mar 8, 2013
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 8, 2013
    If Peter King likes something I almost reflexively have to dislike it. Ayotte and Graham wanting him to be GITMO'D makes me want to believe he should be tried in NY. But then Schumer and Bloomberg are fine with him being tried in NY and I usually go with the opposite of what they want so now it's all gone to hell and I'm all confused and I got mixed emotions about the whole thing :( :(

    I bet OBL has like 70 son-in-laws. Or sons-in-law. Or sons-in-laws. Whatever.

    edit: just saw the dude pleaded not guilty.
     

Share This Page