Food for thought..This guy rapes almost every acient aliens theory ever presented. Enjoy [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zuZmhb5yrsI"]Ancient Aliens Debunked (Full Movie) - YouTube[/ame]
Wait are you saying what this guy says is not true? I'm not sure I'm willing to accept that as he makes very convincing arguments.
I dyslexia'd the title of this thread, while glancing through the forum, as "Adam Savage Savagely Drunk"
Their is some stuff that i just cant wrap my head around like the mayan stegosaurus carving, even if the found a complete stegosaurus skeleton (extremely unlikely) they would gave had no clue what it would have looked like
Let's get things straight. This is what mainstream science says about mankind's history in a nutshell. "Thousands of years ago humans were monkeys. Then, somehow, some of those monkeys started evolving into more advanced species while the other monkeys remained monkeys for God knows what reason. Maybe some of the monkeys found computers on Madagascar and had to adapt and so they evolved into very smart humans. Or something like that, who cares. The earliest civilizations developed from nothing. Suddenly, Egyptians had math and started building pyramids and structures that our modern technology cannot build. The interesting thing is that they cut granite and limestone with copper tools which is impossible but that's the best idea we could come up with. They also carried the stones from 300 miles away by pushing them on fallen trees or some shit. Nobody knows where they found those trees and how they lifted 2 million 50 000kg blocks with laser precision but whatever, things happen. There is clear evidence of water corossion on the Sphinx which means high water levels in the desert which means the Sphinx is not just a few thousand years but rather 10-15000 years old, which mainstream science says - there were no civilizations at that time." This is how ridiculous mainstream science really is. It's pathetic. There are 300-1100 ton blocks perfectly carved which is impossible by mainstream science's findings of copper tools and all they say is ' a thousand men gathered up and lifted the stone'. Like really??? And they roll them on top of trees and maybe they fart all at once and move the stone that way... This does not mean that Ancient Aliens built those. It just means that either there were super advanced human terrestrial civilizations that built those structures or that aliens built them or that aliens helped humans build them. It is incredibly naive and easily debunkable to think that those poor little fuckers who didn't have toilets to shit in and had only copper tools could built humongous structures like the Pyramids and lift 1000 ton blocks. It's just bullshit. And let me just add another ridiculous theory that mainstream science supports. The question "Where did the moon come from?" is answered by mainstream science in this way: First, they developed the Whack theory, which states that a planet hit Earth and the Moon is actually a piece of Earth. Here is why it is complete bullshit. First of all, the distances between planets are incredibly vast. We are talking about millions of miles to the nearest planet so it is very unlikely that a whole planet would hit Earth. However, these things happen from time to time in space. So what else can we say about the theory? Earth is 4 times the size of the Moon so if such an impact happened it would have probably destroyed the whole planet. This is what many of the mathematical models showed. Moreover, Moon is perfectly round and we don't see any evidence on Earth that 1/4 of the planet is missing. On top of that, we cannot find any evidence on planet Earth of such incredibly big chunks of Titanium and other materials found throughout the surface of the Moon. The materials on Moon are very very rarely found on Earth. On top of all this, all the mathematical models showed that if such an impact happened - the Moon would certainly escape Earth's gravity because of the strong impact and its weight. Mainstream scientists tried to make their theory work so made up a second theory!!! THE DOUBLE WHACK THEORY!!! HAHAHAHAHA The double whack theory suggests that after the first impact and the incredible survival of planet Earth, the Moon started escaping Earth's gravity. Suddenly, out of nowhere, a second planet appeared and it whacked the Moon just enough to stop it from escaping but instead of destroying it or taking it in its gravity, the second planet was like "yo Bitch, go suck Earth's dick for eternity" and so the Moon did." Does anyone else find this theory ridiculously funny? No mathematical model supports this theory. No logic, no nothing, complete bullshit. BUT Mainstream science sticks to it. I can go on with a hundred more official theories like this one and show you exactly how naive and ridiculous mainstream science really is. Do you know why they stick to bullshit theories? Because they are hiding the real truth. Mankind's history has been rewritten to the point where it makes no sense and is full of holes and unanswered questions and only if you start researching the findings of the REALLY INDEPENDENT scientists would you find the truth. However, conformism is very strong in our society and people just feel more comfortable when they don't think and let the system control them and tell them what is right and what is wrong, even if it makes no sense.
[quote name='"Sacerdotal"']Let's get things straight. This is what mainstream science says about mankind's history in a nutshell. "Thousands of years ago humans were monkeys. Then, somehow, some of those monkeys started evolving into more advanced species while the other monkeys remained monkeys for God knows what reason. Maybe some of the monkeys found computers on Madagascar and had to adapt and so they evolved into very smart humans. Or something like that, who cares. The earliest civilizations developed from nothing. Suddenly, Egyptians had math and started building pyramids and structures that our modern technology cannot build. The interesting thing is that they cut granite and limestone with copper tools which is impossible but that's the best idea we could come up with. They also carried the stones from 300 miles away by pushing them on fallen trees or some shit. Nobody knows where they found those trees and how they lifted 2 million 50 000kg blocks with laser precision but whatever, things happen. There is clear evidence of water corossion on the Sphinx which means high water levels in the desert which means the Sphinx is not just a few thousand years but rather 10-15000 years old, which mainstream science says - there were no civilizations at that time." This is how ridiculous mainstream science really is. It's pathetic. There are 300-1100 ton blocks perfectly carved which is impossible by mainstream science's findings of copper tools and all they say is ' a thousand men gathered up and lifted the stone'. Like really??? And they roll them on top of trees and maybe they fart all at once and move the stone that way... This does not mean that Ancient Aliens built those. It just means that either there were super advanced human terrestrial civilizations that built those structures or that aliens built them or that aliens helped humans build them. It is incredibly naive and easily debunkable to think that those poor little fuckers who didn't have toilets to shit in and had only copper tools could built humongous structures like the Pyramids and lift 1000 ton blocks. It's just bullshit. And let me just add another ridiculous theory that mainstream science supports. The question "Where did the moon come from?" is answered by mainstream science in this way: First, they developed the Whack theory, which states that a planet hit Earth and the Moon is actually a piece of Earth. Here is why it is complete bullshit. First of all, the distances between planets are incredibly vast. We are talking about millions of miles to the nearest planet so it is very unlikely that a whole planet would hit Earth. However, these things happen from time to time in space. So what else can we say about the theory? Earth is 4 times the size of the Moon so if such an impact happened it would have probably destroyed the whole planet. This is what many of the mathematical models showed. Moreover, Moon is perfectly round and we don't see any evidence on Earth that 1/4 of the planet is missing. On top of that, we cannot find any evidence on planet Earth of such incredibly big chunks of Titanium and other materials found throughout the surface of the Moon. The materials on Moon are very very rarely found on Earth. On top of all this, all the mathematical models showed that if such an impact happened - the Moon would certainly escape Earth's gravity because of the strong impact and its weight. Mainstream scientists tried to make their theory work so made up a second theory!!! THE DOUBLE WHACK THEORY!!! HAHAHAHAHA The double whack theory suggests that after the first impact and the incredible survival of planet Earth, the Moon started escaping Earth's gravity. Suddenly, out of nowhere, a second planet appeared and it whacked the Moon just enough to stop it from escaping but instead of destroying it or taking it in its gravity, the second planet was like "yo Bitch, go suck Earth's dick for eternity" and so the Moon did." Does anyone else find this theory ridiculously funny? No mathematical model supports this theory. No logic, no nothing, complete bullshit. BUT Mainstream science sticks to it. I can go on with a hundred more official theories like this one and show you exactly how naive and ridiculous mainstream science really is. Do you know why they stick to bullshit theories? Because they are hiding the real truth. Mankind's history has been rewritten to the point where it makes no sense and is full of holes and unanswered questions and only if you start researching the findings of the REALLY INDEPENDENT scientists would you find the truth. However, conformism is very strong in our society and people just feel more comfortable when they don't think and let the system control them and tell them what is right and what is wrong, even if it makes no sense.[/quote] I stopped reading after the 2nd paragraph when you decided to try and dumb down the theory of evolution to make it seem uncreditable. Using rhetoric and misinformation like the ancient alien theorists, makes sense. Only way to get people to believe is with that trickery.
When you say that we magically evolved from monkeys while some remained monkeys... /facepalm you do not understand evolution, because the monkeys on earth today most likely were nothing like that, they evolved slower than us
Also, we evolved from APES not MONKEYS. A bit of difference between the two. So more misinformation in the 2nd paragraph alone.
You should at least know the facts before you use it as rhetoric and support for the rest of your argument. Misinformation on top of misinformation on top of misinformation tied up in a clever package with far too many assumptions. Ancient aliens in a nutshell, and the method by which you enjoy debating the controversial topics here. If you threw in a little bit of truth in there, at least in the beginning, you can attempt to give yourself more credibility. But coming out right at the gate with logical fallacies and misinformation makes whatever you say unreadable.
I don't deny evolution. I deny the way the mainstream evolution theory explains it. I will ask several questions and I want you to answer me one by one to see where we go. 1. How long did it take for the APES to become Homosapiens? 2. What exact internal or external factor is responsible for evolution? 3. What exact internal or external factor is responsible for the evolution from an animal-like creature to a highly intelligent humanoid creature? I will ask some more when these are answered.
dude, every intelligent person can understand my post. You are just nit-picking that's all. I wrote the post in a comic-like way. Do you also think that I really think the second planet told the Moon "yo bitch go suck Earth's dick for eternity!" or did I make that up to make it more laughable. Don't be a nitpicker, Doc.
This is not a thread on evolution, it's about how this guy debunks Ancient Aliens using logic and data and sources.