2023 California Production Costs

Discussion in 'Marijuana News' started by Deleted member 1148562, Mar 29, 2023.

  1. Glass House Brands, : The largest cannabis cultivator in California, with roughly 5.5 million square feet of greenhouse capacity in Southern California, including 841,000 square feet dedicated to flowering and 420,000 square feet to nursery operations. The publicly traded company anticipates its cost of production to fall below $110 per pound in the second half of 2023.


    Each year, cultivators are reporting lower production costs no matter whether they grow indoors, in a greenhouse or outdoors. Dramatic decreases were seen in greenhouse production. In response to the question, “What is your operation’s average production cost per pound of dried flower produced,” the number that fell in the middle of responses (the median) for greenhouse growers in 2018 was $300; that figure is now $233. Indoor and outdoor cultivators also are reducing production costs, with the median response to the same question dropping from $425 two years ago to $396 this year for indoor growers, and from $175 in 2018 to $100 this year for outdoor growers.
     
    • Informative Informative x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  2. thats about what it costs a home grower too if he does it right
     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. hmmm...You think you could grow a pound of pot for $110 dollars?
     
    • Like Like x 2
  4. Holy shit I was reading that as per ounce. lol Per pound that's incredible.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  5. my secret is my landlord pays my electric or it would be a lot more lol
     
    • Winner Winner x 3
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  6. Way cheaper. That's the outdoor production costs and for me growing outdoors cost about as much as growing some tomato or squash plants. As it should be.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Like Like x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  7. Fair enough that its not a conventional indoor facility. So you think a company that is run inside greenhouses with supplemental lighting and HVAC should be considered outdoors?
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  8. Outdoors, absolutely. Indoors its closer that $396. But keep in mind all of this is "production cost". That doesnt include setup and equipment.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  9. No, that would be considered "greenhouse". More expensive that "outdoor", less expensive than "indoor". Youd be surprised how many veggies come from green houses. The extensive benefits of greenhouses help to cover the investment while still providing people with quality "sun grown" herbs.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  10. A pound outdoors could be done but getting anywhere close to the number of pounds they are talking would take more room than my growpatch has.
     
  11. and another company goes bust.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  12. plus my labor to grow a pound costs at least that
     
    • Like Like x 1

Share This Page