I'm currently on vacation, and my older brother is with me too. He graduated(masters) in environmental management. In short, he's an environmentalist.
I'm will shortly be going into University soon, and hope to take study in political science/economics. Him graduating with a BA in political economics, he knows quite much and is knowledgeable in politics in general.
Yesterday he started to argue with me of how a)Ron Paul won't win the nomination and
"Ron Paul is too extreme. He wants to abolish the federal government, and abolish the EPA,CIA,etc. As me being an environmentalist, I see that as a huge problem. He wants to end the Fed. Reserve, that takes away the country's power to borrow, along with other important actions in the country's economics."
With me saying that Ron Paul wants to get rid of the EPA, and believes that tort laws will resolve pollution.
Him responding, "Who's going to ENFORCE TORT LAWS?"
He was trying to say that with Federal Gov gone, who is going to enforce a lot of the things in our country?
Look I can go on, but before you guys start debating about this, please know for a fact that my brother graduated from one the top schools in the country, and he does know what he is talking about, and knows more in depth of the political game. so he isn't saying this to say this without knowledge.
In all, how extreme is Ron Paul? If he does reduce Federal Gov. power, aren't there dangerous scenarios that can happen in the country? Hell even the newspapers, economic annalists are telling people that if we go back to the gold standard, things aren't gonna go well. Gold is quite rare these days, and how can we produce paper money on something that is limited in this world?

Back to top








Sign In
Create Account