Jump to content

Welcome to Grasscity Forums
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.
Login to Account Create an Account

How much THC does each smoking method save?


  • Please log in to reply
 

#1
oomfga

oomfga

    Registered User

  • Registered Upgraded
  • Pip
  • 8 posts
I've been hearing stuff about a joint retaining 28% of the THC in your weed, a bong 78% and a vape like 92%. What about other ones? Does anybody know roughly how much other methods use?
The ones I would most want to know is pipe, waterfall bong and gravity bong :D
Thanks!

#2
randgen

randgen

    Registered User

  • Registered Upgraded
  • 378 posts
I really have no clue but I think the reason joints are so inefficient is because they burn way hotter than bowls thus destroying a good portion of the thc before it gets to you. Anything that uses a bowl (waterfalls, bubblers, pipes) should be the same as a bong except bongs get you higher because you can take massive hits.

Man I really wanna try some budder out of a vape. Nearly 100% straight to the brain. That shits gotta be intense!

#3
hatchplzhelp

hatchplzhelp

    Registered User

  • Registered Upgraded
  • 1,344 posts

I've been hearing stuff about a joint retaining 28% of the THC in your weed, a bong 78% and a vape like 92%. What about other ones? Does anybody know roughly how much other methods use?
The ones I would most want to know is pipe, waterfall bong and gravity bong :D
Thanks!


Man all those things you listed are MYTHS no one knows that shit. A chillum will get you high. Joints and blunts dont work as well bc they are on fire the entire time so half of the shit burns up while your holding it.

#4
masterchiefer

masterchiefer

    And the tree was happy.

  • Registered Upgraded
  • 4,071 posts

Man all those things you listed are MYTHS no one knows that shit. A chillum will get you high. Joints and blunts dont work as well bc they are on fire the entire time so half of the shit burns up while your holding it.



pretty sure they're not myths and that they have been researched a good deal

#5
Rami.Nauja

Rami.Nauja

    Registered User

  • Registered Upgraded
  • 663 posts
http://forum.grassci...ices-facts.html

here's the same thread as this posted by another person

#6
hatchplzhelp

hatchplzhelp

    Registered User

  • Registered Upgraded
  • 1,344 posts

pretty sure they're not myths and that they have been researched a good deal


I wish someone would post scientific data. I looked for more then an hour and couldn't come up with anything other then post. The number that the OP included seem to have came from a TV show called "The man show". Which they didn't describe how they came to this conclusion. I only smoke out of chillums, so it's not that important to me,yet it would be nice to know the scientific studies behind this conclusion.

#7
chronicman00

chronicman00

    Bay Shark

  • Registered Upgraded
  • 9,564 posts
idk but a joint/blunt can be higher or lower depending on how you smoke and how its been rolled. the looser it is the more smoke will be coming off the end and smoking. the less hits you take the less high you get and the more you take the higher youll get so it really depends on how you roll and smoke.

#8
LucyInTheSky17

LucyInTheSky17

    o_O

  • Registered Upgraded
  • 276 posts
I seem to get as high off my joints compared to how high I get from my bong rips.

0.5g in a joint = 0.5g in a spoon = 0.5g in a bong

I doubt that only a certain amount of THC comes from each of the methods, but that's only from personal experience.

By all means, continue to argue that my joint won't get me as high as my bong. Either way your gonna have to speak up since I can't hear that well while I'm up in the trees and your on the ground.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users