Dear Blades, The debate, as they say, is now over. Definitive proof that leading global warming scientists have been conspiring for years to fake data, publish false papers by conspiring to get them past peer review censors, hide actual data, etc. Breaking News Story: CRU has apparently been hacked – hundreds of files released « Watts Up With That? Hadley hacked: warmist conspiracy exposed? | Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog And IMHO the best summary taken from multiple sources is found here: Hot Air » Blog Archive » Do hacked e-mails show global-warming fraud?
It just seems like an excuse to be lazy and not care. Even if we aren't all goin to burn up or freeze in 50 or 100 years because of global warming, nobody really knows for sure. So why not error on the side of caution, get our shit together and take care of the earth instead of finding more excuses not to give a shit
Nobody said hey lets just be lazy and see if we can keep trying to fuck the world up. the point of the release of this information is because thin kabout all the money that we have shelled out in taxes and shit like that to help the government fund programs for a greener earth because it is so immediately necessary. I mean shi t presidential candidates have run an entire election with adressing the threat of global warming as one fo there top priorities and now all of the sudden we find out all the high ass paid scientist are a bunch of ass grabbing lyers. Thats some chump shit right there man. But regardless we should all do our parts to maintain the earth.
lol.... "I don't care what the truth is" one of the emails: Wow..... If this turns out to be 100% ligit, it wont surprise me. I've instinctively distrusted this political man made global warming movement. I'm all for clean energy, saving the jungles and recycling, but those people just want ot use the fear of GW in order to gain more control and power.
Are you a true believer? Meaning despite all reason and facts you'll have faith in the promise of cataclysmic earth changes thanks to man?
There's a big difference between being a conservationist/environmentalist, and being an anthropogenic global warming alarmist. One seeks to preserve and protect the habitat, the other seeks to regulate and control humans, keeping them from doing things that are insignificant in the grand scheme of things, like driving an SUV. Co2 is good for the environment, and we aren't contributing enough to turn the earth into a sauna. The western nations want to cripple budding industrialized countries, that's destroying the quality of living for millions.
i was asking the dude who "lol'd" if he was one of those Global warming truthers who believes it because the Obama & Bush regimes and the media say it's true without looking at facts from thousands of scientists. then you asked me a confusing question that i really don't know how to respond to. so that's what i'm talking about. and this thread should be in Pandora's Box because like the 9/11 thing global warming is also a conspiracy theory.