By Walter Cronkite Source: Ventura County Star With this nation embroiled in what threatens to be an interminable "War on Terrorism," an idea put forward last year by Ohio Congressman Dennis Kucinich has, for me, considerable appeal. Kucinich, who was the one candidate in the Democratic primaries to promote the party's traditional Franklin Roosevelt liberalism, proposed the establishment of a Department of Peace. Now he has introduced in the House HR2459, a bill that would establish a Peace Department, adding a new cabinet post to the executive branch of government. The Department of Peace would "advise the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State on all matters relating to national security, including the protection of human rights and the prevention of, amelioration of, and de-escalation of unarmed and armed international conflict." The secretary of peace would serve as a delegate to the National Security Council and also would "provide training of all United States personnel who administer post-conflict reconstruction and demobilization in war-torn societies." In other words, the Department of Peace would be a constant, working counterpoint to the Defense Department and its expenditure of billions of dollars for weapons of war. The department would act not only in an international context, but also in areas of domestic policy that endanger the nation's well-being: the proliferation of automatic weapons and the violence in our schools, our homes and in our streets. It might well come up with some new strategies for turning around our losing war on drugs, and it might also lobby Congress to put an end to the cruel and unusual punishment of small-time drug offenders called "mandatory sentencing." It would also advise the attorney general on matters of civil rights and labor law. But its primary importance, it seems to me, would be in international affairs, demonstrating to the world, to borrow the old motto of the Strategic Air Command, that "peace is our profession." Now, to some, this is going to sound terribly naive, given the current state of things and the very real, hard-edged dangers that face us. But the naivete just might lie on the side of those who believe that military force and our policy of pre-emption are alone sufficient to make us safe. The fact is that there is nothing in this proposal that would weaken our military posture or our ability to strike terrorists and to do whatever is necessary for the defense of the United States. But wouldn't it be an advantage to have a peer of the secretaries of defense and state whose responsibility it was to develop the methods and means of peaceful conflict resolution and to offer peaceful alternatives in the councils of war? Wouldn't it have been an advantage in the run-up to Iraq to have a department responsible for training U.S. personnel in human rights, conflict resolution, reconstruction and planning necessary to restoring a durable peace; in short, to do what was so disastrously absent when our forces rolled into Baghdad? Right now the bill is a long way from realization, with only a few dozen congressional sponsors. Actually, there is an urgency to its adoption. In this dangerous world, where the strength of the United States is needed to keep the peace, we need a visible manifestation of our intention to play that role, without the arrogance that cost us friends and allies among the nations and peoples of the world. But no matter how far off it might be, it is an idea that deserves our attention. We can hope that Kucinich and those who are pioneers in supporting his bill stay the course and redouble their efforts. Walter Cronkite can be reached by mail, c/o King Features Syndicate, 888 Seventh Ave., New York, N.Y. 10019, or by e-mail at: mail@cronkitecolumn.com Complete Title: An Idea That Deserves Attention: Department of Peace Source: Ventura County Star (CA) Author: Walter Cronkite Published: August 12, 2004 Copyright: 2004 The E.W. Scripps Co. Contact: letters@insidevc.com Website: http://www.venturacountystar.com/
hah, sounds like 1984.. ministry of love.. if they name a department after peace or "the goal of humans as a whole" or something to that effect, then people will most probably believe anything the government tells them after that because it will be hidden behind a euphemism such as that.. peace love and understanding are words not yet known by government..
So if you think the 'dept. of peace' could potentially be corrupted in some kind of Orwellian dictatorship, what do you think of the very real 'dept. of homeland security'? Surely that's at least as disturbing.
personnaly i think its a good idea...as long as it has limited power. lol but that would never happen w/ George Dubya in office again. God we're all doomed if that happens.......