9/11 was an inside job

Discussion in 'Pandora's Box' started by Cosmored, Mar 12, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. #1 Cosmored, Mar 12, 2009
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 19, 2009
    Look at this picture of the nose of the plane that hit the Pentagon.
    http://www.g7welcomingcommittee.com/blog/wp-content/images/pentagon1_plane.jpg

    It's too pointed to be the nose of a 757.
    http://www.caverca.com/Images/Boeing 757 TACV 01.jpg

    The photo of the nose of the plane that hit the Pentagon was taken with a fish-eye lens which causes some distortion but the rest of the objects in the picture are not distorted to the same degree as the nose of a 757 would have to be to have that shape. The shadow line is visible under the nose and it's consistent with the shadow of the Pentagon.

    The picture is consistent with this analysis.
    http://www.physics911.net/missingwings

    Also, we know that the Pentagon is about 75 feet high and that a 757 is about 150 feet long. If we look at the section of the Pentagon where the plane hit in the picture at the top of this page...
    http://0911.site.voila.fr/index3.htm

    ...and compare it with the space behind the box where the aircraft is, we can see that a 757 couldn't fit in that space without the nose protruding out front. The plane in the space behind the box is much too short to be a 757.

    A 757 would look like this.
    http://www.911research.dsl.pipex.com/pentagon/pentacamscam.jpg

    Also, if you look at the fourth picture from the top on this page, you'll see the hole made by the craft.
    http://www.physics911.net/missingwings

    There would have been some damage from the wings of a 757. Look at the damage caused by the 767 on the side of the tower.
    http://jabbajoo.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341c0ac653ef00e5537c495d8834-pi

    There's quite a difference.

    There are some good documentaries in this link.
    http://www.question911.com/linksall.htm

    Be sure to watch "9/11 Mysteries" and "Painful Deceptions". This stuff below is good too.
    [ame="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8989407671184881047"]What's The Truth?: How Indeed Did The Twin Towers Collapse[/ame]
    http://www.wtc7.net/articles/WhyIndeed09.pdf

    I think that those people who put forth the no-plane theory, etc are governnment disinfo agents trying to cause disruption in the 9/11 truth movement. If there are some wacko theories out there that make the official version look logical by comparison, fewer people will join the truth movement.

    This article deals with that subject.
    http://pseudonautics.blogspot.com/2008/11/disinformation-techniques.html
    (excerpt)
    --------------------------------------------------------------
    The best way to harm a cause is to defend it using wrong arguments.
    This is why, every time there is a government conspiracy, you have a load of kooks making ridiculous claims to discredit critics by association.
    Concerning 911, you have pod people, holograms, WTC nuclear devices, and directed energy weapons from space.
    --------------------------------------------------------------

    Of course the government planned and carried out the 9/11 attacks so they could invade Afganistan and Iraq to get control of oil in the Middle East. This is an old story.

    http://video.google.es/videosearch?q=terror+storm&emb=0&aq=f#

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO301A.html
    http://www.nadir.org/nadir/initiativ/agp/free/chossudovsky/fabricatingenemy.htm

    (added March 19, 2009)
    ---------------------------------
    There a lot of good info in these two links.
    http://www.netctr.com/media.html
    http://www.netctr.com/911exposed.html
     
  2. This again?
     
  3. Exactly what I was thinking...
     
  4. What the fuck is 9/11
     
  5. #5 Serapsis, Mar 12, 2009
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 12, 2009
    What is... A day that will live in infamy

    [​IMG]

    Incorrect.
     
  6. Best response ever.
     
  7. some sort of task that happened indoors apparently
     
  8. Really ?

    I thought it was the number you called if you where in trouble....:p
     
  9. Nothing but bullshit that has been twisted, distorted, and taken out of context to fit the views of the
    "twoofers".

    Bring it to the Politics Section.
     
  10. I'll like to call 911 for 911 inside job.
     
  11. Nope, although it was used as an excuse to help those in power to further their own political agenda.
     
  12. that video was very interesting
     
  13. kthxbye

    heard this shit a million times
     
  14. The 9/11 theory is based on your own opinion. It's what you already think about the government, in my opinion atleast. Take a look at this video, its pretty interesting if you think that the government has something to do with it.

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7E3oIbO0AWE"]YouTube - 911 Loose Change (full-length)[/ame]
     
  15. Thank you, for bringing this information to our attention because we didn't even know there were opposing theories going on. After all, we do live inside of rocks located under rocks.
     
  16. #19 HelloFriend, Sep 20, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 20, 2012
    IT WAS an inside job. More precisely the government job. The plain did not hit the Pentagon, there were no pieces of plane whatsoever, and no plain will make that small hole... It was probably some war plane shooting a rocket to the wall or something... And also it was Pentagon... the most secure place in the world, and no pictures of plane hitting that wall or anything? what was happening to security cameras at that time? :p It was all planned by the govt.
     
  17. This has been discussed to death, rebirth, and death again, just let it go already...
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page