Login to Account Create an Account
9/11 Bombshell: WTC7 Security Official Details Explosions Inside Building
#1
Posted 21 June 2007 - 09:41 PM
9/11 Bombshell: WTC7 Security Official Details Explosions Inside Building
Says bombs were going off in 7 before either tower collpased
Steve Watson
Prison Planet
Tuesday, June 19, 2007
The Alex Jones show today welcomed Loose Change creators Dylan Avery and Jason Burmas to discuss an exclusive interview they have conducted with an individual with high level security clearance who was inside the Office of Emergency Management in World Trade Center 7 and has descibed and detailed explosions inside the building prior to the collapse of any of the buildings at ground zero on 9/11.
The interview, to be featured in the forthcoming Final Cut of Loose Change is currently under wraps but the creators have allowed some details to leak purely to protect themselves and the individual involved who has asked to remain anonymous until the film is released.
We can reveal that the individual concerned was asked to report to building seven with a city official after the first attack on the North tower but before the second plane hit the South Tower and before their eventual collapse, in order to provide the official with access to different floors of the building.
The city official he was escorting was attempting to reach Rudy Guiliani, who he had determined was inside building 7 at that time. According to Avery and Burmas this official now works for Guiliani partners.
The individual was also asked to provide access to the Office Of Emergency Management on the 23rd floor of the building, this was the so called "bunker" that was built inside WTC7 on the orders of Rudy Guiliani.
When he got there he found the office evacuated and after making some calls was told to leave immediately.
It was at this point that he witnessed a bomb going off inside the building:
"We subsequently went to the stairwell and were going down the stairs, when we reached the sixth floor, the landing that we were standing on gave way, there was an explosion and the landing gave way. I was left there hanging, I had to climb back up and now had to walk back up to the eighth floor. After getting to the eighth floor everything was dark."
The individual in a second clip detailed hearing further explosions and then described what he saw when he got down to the lobby:
"It was totally destroyed, it looked like King Kong had been through it and stepped on it and it was so destroyed i didn't know where I was. It was so destroyed that had to take me out through a hole in the wall, a makeshift hole I believe the fire department made to get me out."
He was then told by firefighters to get twenty blocks away from the area because explosions were going off all over the World Trade Center complex.
The key to this information is that the individual testifies this all happened BEFORE either tower collapsed, thus building 7 was at that point completely undamaged from any falling debris or resulting fires. It also means that explosions were witnessed in WTC7 up to eight hours before its collapse at around 5.30pm.
listen to the clips here.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Internet leader in activist media - Prison Planet.tv. Get access to hundreds of special video reports, audio interviews, books and documentary films. Subscribers also get instant access to our hugely popular forum where you can network with like-minded people, meet up and get active! Click here to subscribe.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avery and Burmas, who played the two short clips of the interview prior to further analysis and more clips to be played on their own GCN radio show later tonight at 7pm CST, further described how the individual had witnessed dead bodies in the lobby of 7 and was told by the police not to look at them.
This is vital information because it is in direct conflict with the official claim that no one was killed inside building 7. The 9/11 Commission report did not even mention building, yet here we have a key witness who told them he saw dead people inside the building after explosions had gutted the lower level.
What makes all this information even more explosive is the fact that this individual was interviewed by the 9/11 Commission as they conducted their so called investigation.
The fact that the building was not even mentioned in the report in light of this information thus becomes chilling and indicates that officials have lied in stating that they have not come into contact with evidence of explosive devices within the buildings.
Avery and Burmas successfully contacted the individual after discovering a TV interview he did on 9/11 while they were trawling through news footage from the day in research for the Final Cut.
Avery says that he can and will prove beyond any shadow of doubt that the individual was in building 7 on 9/11 and that what he is saying is accurate.
#2
Posted 21 June 2007 - 10:27 PM
http://www.prisonpla...07interview.htm
9/11 Bombshell: WTC7 Security Official Details Explosions Inside Building
Says bombs were going off in 7 before either tower collpased
Steve Watson
Prison Planet
Tuesday, June 19, 2007
The Alex Jones show today welcomed Loose Change creators
This is pretty much the cue to stop reading...
#3
Posted 23 June 2007 - 07:15 AM
however, you failed to negate the information the wtc7 security official gave which is that he heard bombs exploding in building 7 after the first plane hit the tower.
do you have an explanation as to why several first responders (police, firefighters, and emt's) have testified that they heard bombs going off at ground zero including this wtc security official who personally heard the bombs going off and witnessed some of the aftermath inside the building?
however, i do suppose it's a lot easier to justify you unjustifiable position, just to expect everyone to simply turn a blind eye to the irreufutable information simple because it came from infowars.
#4
Posted 23 June 2007 - 07:22 AM
#5
Posted 23 June 2007 - 07:34 AM
#6
Posted 23 June 2007 - 07:36 AM
#7
Posted 23 June 2007 - 10:48 AM
[Yawn...]
I'm sad to report that I read the article, but I only did it because I'm stoned. About the article, I have to say, it just goes to show you the lengths that some people will go to in order to avoid seeing reality.
[AK walks back into the Nexus wondering why the fuck he came out to begin with.]
#8
Posted 23 June 2007 - 01:43 PM
[Yawn...]
I'm sad to report that I read the article, but I only did it because I'm stoned. About the article, I have to say, it just goes to show you the lengths that some people will go to in order to avoid seeing reality.
[AK walks back into the Nexus wondering why the fuck he came out to begin with.]
Couldn't have said it better, AK. The only thing I ever liked from Alex Jones was his part in Waking Life. He just finds the most obscure outcomes and theories for any logical event, and sides with that. What an attention whore.
#9
Posted 23 June 2007 - 01:56 PM
i think it was planted among the rubble... i scratch my head about this whole event,,,,,
#10
Posted 23 June 2007 - 02:19 PM
#11
Posted 23 June 2007 - 02:39 PM
Huh... I could have sworn it was that Osama Bin Laden.
#12
Posted 23 June 2007 - 03:24 PM
It also interviewed staff of a hotel along the path of this "UFO" that supposedly was controled by terrorists that impacted the pentagon. They said they watched thier survalence cameras after they heard a "missle or something" outside. The cameras showed footage of an object much faster and smaller then a plane but before they could get a better look the FBI came with a warrent for all video recordings in the building.
#13
Posted 23 June 2007 - 04:04 PM
September 11th happened, and people died.
The end.
thankyou chip.
its because of this frantic hunt for someone to blame and aprehend that makes the US such bullies. why cant we be satisfied with the fact that whatever happened in the WTC buildings, the pentagon AND the flight that was bought down by its passengers were all one connected incident, and that many people suffered, died and lost family because of this merciless killing.
dont make more out of it than it is. what good will proving this whole thing is a conspiracy do? if all this was true either it would prove that the US is behind this in some way or we really are a hell of a lot less safe than we already through we were.
unless i see some hard evidence that there were explosions going off inside the WTC7 tower before the first tower collapsed, i wont ever beleive a single word of it.
#14
Posted 23 June 2007 - 04:08 PM
I seriously belive that 9/11 was a conspirricy because of a video full of eyewitness reports my friend showed me a few years ago. They showed a recording of a radar tape they managed to keep out of the FBI's hands which showed an object moving "Alot faster then any plane."
It also interviewed staff of a hotel along the path of this "UFO" that supposedly was controled by terrorists that impacted the pentagon. They said they watched thier survalence cameras after they heard a "missle or something" outside. The cameras showed footage of an object much faster and smaller then a plane but before they could get a better look the FBI came with a warrent for all video recordings in the building.
now thats just crazy! who would be flying ICBM's into our buildings, i dont think there is anything that flies over the US that we cant shoot down very fast. i highly doubt an air attack is possible unless it is like the actual 9/11 attacks that happened. id love to see this clip because im sure its BS like 90% of conspiracy theories.
EDIT: and after about a min ute on the site this is all i neeeded to see before closing the page:
#15
Posted 23 June 2007 - 04:16 PM
Loose Change: George Bush planned September 11th.
Huh... I could have sworn it was that Osama Bin Laden.
I could have sworn the pentagon was the most protected building in the world
this isn't the fist time thing like this have happened, wikipedia has just a few examples
http://en.wikipedia....sored_terrorism
http://en.wikipedia....wiki/False_flag
#16
Posted 23 June 2007 - 04:40 PM
But I understand your arguement after all terrorism is only just a myth.
#17
Posted 23 June 2007 - 04:42 PM
What do you want them to do, just blow up the plane over a neighborhood, city, or something?
But I understand your arguement after all terrorism is only just a myth.
well considering the planes were in the air over an hour after they were hijacked I think there was plenty of opportunities to shoot them down
and I would appreciate being treated with respect, but whatever I can't control what you do
#18
Posted 23 June 2007 - 04:48 PM
You have to understand, when was the last time a commercial plane was hijacked and flown into a building. They caught us with our pants down. It was like a sucker punch. Security has tightened down alot i dont think a terrorist, or more importantly a weapon could get through now-a-days. They'll wait till we let our guard down to try and get us again.
#19
Posted 23 June 2007 - 04:56 PM
then I take it you believe any hijacked plane should be shot down immediately? Forfeiting those people lives is no minor thing.
You have to understand, when was the last time a commercial plane was hijacked and flown into a building. They caught us with our pants down. It was like a sucker punch. Security has tightened down alot i dont think a terrorist, or more importantly a weapon could get through now-a-days. They'll wait till we let our guard down to try and get us again.
not only did they not shoot it down, they did nothing. atleast get some fighter jets following the planes, while they were on there way they were told to stand down
#20
Posted 23 June 2007 - 05:42 PM
not only did they not shoot it down, they did nothing. atleast get some fighter jets following the planes, while they were on there way they were told to stand down
when a commercial airliner is hijacked I doubt the security protocol is to "just let it go" and I suriously doubt they were completely unprepared for a hijacked aircraft, I mean come on they had to have atleast SOME type of security protocol for it, I mean honestly its not like before then no one had ever considered the thought a commercial airline could get hijacked
They do, NORAD. You are right, it is very odd that a fighter jet was not following those planes trying to figure out what was going on.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Back to top









Sign In
Create Account