My plants are about 2 weeks out and I am beginning the flush. My plan is to just water with ph balanced water and let that get all the built up salts out. Will this method be fine or do I need to really drain them out in the shower or something? Thanks guys.
To my flush on the blog: its the same post veg or post bud http://forum.grasscity.com/blog/1093/entry-9829-fl... Always a good idea to avoid flushing one plant just to see if you notice the difference good luck
I think most people pour around 2 or 3 times the volume of the pot with water. You will need somewhere for all this to drain. I put them in the bath to allow it to just run down the drain
also this.. from a well respected grower. re: "flushing" Chlorophyll b is the 'type' found in plants as we're defining it. Other structures are found in algae, cyanobacteria, et al. Here is the molecular formula - C55H70O6N4Mg so we're looking at 55 Carbon ions, 70 Hydrogen ions, 6 Oxygen ions, 4 Nitrogen ions and 1 Magnesium ion. All 6 forms of chlorophyll have one consistent dynamic, i.e. a single Magnesium ion. Not two, not three - one. So much for the mythology about magnesium-hungry plants or worse in the wacky weed world where specific 'strains' can be magnesium-hungry. Looking at just chlorophyll b a better myth would be carbon-hungry or hydrogen-hungry and maybe even oxygen-hungry and nothing to do with magnesium. My understanding of this worst example of stoner science is that by dumping copious amounts of water somehow water with it's simple H2O formula is able to reach up from the root zone then into a plant's vascular system and deconstruct a fairly complex molecule - that must be some really unique water indeed! In a dynamic called translocation plants can and do move materials from leaves to other tissues - that is established botany. Plants produce carbohydrates (sugars) in the leaves by photosynthesis but non-photysynthetic parts of the plant also require carbohydrates and other organic and nonorganic materials. It's for this reason that nutrients are translocated from sources (regions of excess carbohydrates, primarily matures leaves) to what are called sinks. ?Some important sinks are roots, flowers, fruits, stems and developing leaves. Leaves are particularly interesting in the translocation process because they are sinks when they are young and become sources later when they are about half-grown. Carbohydrates are simply Carbon, Hydrogen and Oxygen molecules, i.e. simple sugars. So let's say for sake of silliness that flushing can trigger translocation which must be a real threat for rice plants, where are the chlorophyll molecules going? They can't be destroyed because they're elements which cannot be destroyed or changed unless of course we're talking about cannabis which has special properties that negate almost every law of botany, biology, chemistry, physics imaginable. My simple question is this: once this special water deconstructs the chlorophyll compound where do the ions go? Into thin air? That would be difficult since Magnesium is a metallic element but again we have to suspend even common sense to shore-up the flushing argument so who knows? Perhaps a special air canopy is created from flushing which can move magnesium around at will. Even if water could deconstruct and force translocation of elements doesn't that defeat the purpose in the first place which is claimed that flushing will remove the nasties causing us to not have dank! If the mature leaves are the repository the why would you want to move these ions to the buds which you plan on consuming? It's difficult to write this stuff without falling out of my chair with laughter. The argument fails on every level - even common sense. Fire away! I'm wearing stainless-steel Fruit of the Loom briefs - I can take it! CC
flushing is certainly not bullshit, but it's more important when plants have been overdosed. Plants require a lower and lower strength of nutrients after they have gone half way through flowering. If you match the nutrient concentration throughout this time then flushing is unnecessary in my opinion but you can't over flush so it's usually safer to flush more than less
could you even carry a 30 gallon pot to and from the bathroom? 2-3 times the volume of the pot is pretty standard practice with most growers, whether it's insane or not. It's actually worth doing if the soil has a concentration of nutes that too high. It's obviously better to not allow it to get too high in the first place, but this is all too common on the grow scene
for the most part, yes. I guess it helps get some salts out if you overfed your plants.. but adding 3x the amount of water to a pot is laughable. never heard of anyone doing this other than weed growers.. stoner science imo.