The Strange Odyssey of Bradley Birkenfeld FATCA, Voluntary Disclosure and the IRS Whistle-Blower Program

Discussion in 'Marijuana News' started by jainaG, Oct 13, 2015.

  1. http://sflegalguide.com/Foodmanfe12.html
    http://tuftslawfirm.com/informants/



    By Stanley I. Foodman

    Bradley Birkenfeld, a former banker at UBS, probably contributed more to the
    ongoing obliteration of international banking haven secrecy than any
    other instrument. He was a whistle-blower who was rewarded by the U.S.
    government with $104 million, while receiving a slap in the face (a
    couple of years in prison).



    Under the IRS program, a whistle-blower can be paid from 15 percent up
    to 30 percent of taxes recovered by IRS resulting from the information
    provided to the agency. It is safe to presume that the information
    provided by Mr. Birkenfeld resulted in the IRS collecting at least $346
    million from UBS.



    Who is eligible to receive an IRS whistle-blower reward? The IRS may pay
    awards to people who provide specific and credible information to the
    IRS if the information results in the collection of taxes, penalties,
    interest or other amounts from the noncompliant taxpayer. Individuals
    are eligible for awards based on additions to tax, penalties, interest,
    and other amounts collected as a result of any administrative or
    judicial action resulting from the information provided. The IRS is
    looking for solid information, not an “educated guess” or unsupported
    speculation. It is looking for a significant federal tax issue.



    The IRS whistle-blower program is not designed to resolve personal
    problems or disputes about a business relationship. And once an award is
    authorized, the IRS will research the whistle-blower's own accounts to
    confirm that he or she has filed required returns and satisfied all tax
    liabilities for the previous three years. If the whistle-blower has not
    filed returns or has outstanding tax liabilities, then the IRS will
    determine why he/she has not filed the returns or paid the tax
    liabilities, in which case the matter will be referred to the
    appropriate enforcement function. Award payments will first be used to
    offset any unpaid tax liabilities owed by the whistle-blower.



    The IRS Code section under which whistle-blower awards are permitted provides for two types of awards.



    1. If the taxes, penalties, interest and other amounts in dispute exceed
    $2 million, and a few other qualifications are met, the IRS will pay 15
    percent to 30 percent of the amount collected. If the case deals with
    an individual, his or her annual gross income must be more than
    $200,000. If the whistle-blower disagrees with the outcome of the claim,
    he or she can appeal to the Tax Court. (Internal Revenue Code IRC
    Section 7623(b) - Whistleblower Rules).



    2. For cases that do not meet the dollar thresholds of $2 million in a
    dispute or cases involving individual taxpayers with gross income of
    less than $200,000, the awards are less, with a maximum award of 15
    percent up to $10 million. In addition, the awards are discretionary and
    the informant cannot dispute the outcome of the claim in Tax Court.
    (Internal Revenue Code IRC Section 7623(a) - Informant Claims Program).



    How does this IRS program affect foreign financial institutions (FFIs)
    covered under the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) and
    taxpayers who are considering entering the U.S. Offshore Voluntary
    Disclosure Program (OVDP)?



    1. FFIs worldwide ought to be aware of their vulnerability. UBS paid a heavy price ($780 million) to avoid U.S. prosecution.



    2. In certain offshore jurisdictions, FFIs are family businesses or legacy businesses.



    a. They are privately held and pass from generation to generation, or



    b. They are eventually sold to other legacy FFIs



    c. Many of the shareholders/owners of legacy FFIs are also U.S. taxpayers.



    3. Many individuals with undisclosed foreign financial accounts have
    them in legacy FFIs. With FFI reporting under the FATCA regime and the
    added incentives of the U.S. whistle-blower program there really is no
    place to hide.



    Up
    until now, Mr. Birkenfeld has been the ultimate IRS whistle-blower.
    After all, the U.S. government kept its end of the IRS commitment
    despite Mr. Birkenfeld' s prosecution and prison term for his reticence
    on his own involvement. Disgruntled employees of FFIs (of which there
    are many due to their economic circumstances) as well as ill meaning
    avaricious business associates could well follow in the footsteps of Mr.
    Birkenfeld.



    What is also interesting to note is that Mr. Birkenfeld is still blowing
    the whistle, after a period of more than two years in prison. The IRS
    is going to make sure to squeeze every last bit of information from him
    and from future whistleblowers. The IRS is not only after the taxpayers
    who may be avoiding their fiscal obligations, or the banks that may be
    assisting them. They also want to know the individual bank officers
    and/or tax advisors that may be aiding them and/or other clients in
    other banks in the same manner.



    The same “information squeeze” is occurring during the Individual
    Offshore Voluntary Disclosure process. All voluntary disclosers, as is
    the case with whistle-blowers, are expected to come forth with an open
    book and assist the IRS investigators with any information they may
    have, whether it is directly related to their particular cases or not.



    So, you may not be a U.S. taxpayer or a bank, but if you have advised or
    assisted any tax evasion, or given incorrect advice that has resulted
    in evasion, beware. The U.S. government has not only proved that it is
    willing to prosecute foreign nationals, as shown by the Wegelin Bank
    case, but it has now also reinforced its zero tolerance on tax evasion
    crimes by placing them in the “financial crimes” category side by side
    with money laundering and terrorist financing. This is not a good place
    to be in.



    Stanley I. Foodman is CEO of Foodman CPAs & Advisors and a
    recognized forensic accountant and litigation support practitioner.
    Specializing in complex domestic and international tax matters, Foodman
    has served as an expert witness and forensic accountant for some of the
    nation's most challenging, high-profile economic crime cases. Foodman
    and his team of accountants also assist clients with a full range of
    accounting matters including compliance, voluntary disclosure, corporate
    and individual taxation, family law litigation, estate and trust tax
    and wealth planning. Consistently ranked as one of the top accounting
    firms in South Florida, Foodman CPAs & Advisors assists clients
    locally, nationally and internationally.





    South Florida Legal Guide 2012 Financial Edition
     

Share This Page