Interesting, think of the implications We currently have existing today, an advanced scattered network of an incredibly advanced and incredibly efficient artificial intelligence Combine all the current technologies today into one AI network and you'd have a very scary thing Program it with a base function of "survive... and "multiply"
I think the AI will know that a symbiotic relationship with us would be best, if we posed a threat to it's existence however that's another story We're slowly merging with machines and our children will have a whole different view of what it is to be actually human. Theirs will be modular Our generation is the last of it's kind, the last fully original humans
I think this is a good point. By the time full blown AI comes around, people may be chipped into some sort of mainframe already so the humans AI will meet won't be 100% human anyway. Whether it's Ray Kurzweil's singularity, or simply more mechanically enhanced humans, the meeting and merger of humanity and AI could very well be a lot smoother than we anticipate because in our current stage we are still mostly human. When the meeting happens, we may not be. Ask yourself who is more likely to comprehend and conceive of AI, you, or someone who lived in the 70's? Now pose the same question but between you and someone living in 2050.
Rock Paper Scissors robot wins 100% of the time The newest version of a robot from Japanese researchers can not only challenge the best human players in a game of Rock Paper Scissors, but it can beat them - 100% of the time. In reality, the robot uses a sophisticated form a cheating which both breaks the game itself (the robot didn't “win†by the actual rules of the game) and shows the amazing potential of the human-machine interfaces of tomorrow. First, how the robot won: by watching. There were three strategies that could produce a 100% win record, but they all basically boil down to using a high-speed camera and human-beating electronic reflexes to identify the oncoming shape of the opponent's hand and play the corresponding move to beat it. Just the angle of the wrist or early movement of the fingers is enough to give away what move the human is headed for. The worst strategy produced a winning move about 0.02 seconds after the human's move, the fastest almost instantaneously, but in all cases the robot is technically waiting to see the opponent's move before deciding on its own - that's cheating, bro! This is why the robot famously “Never loses. Ever.†- because it's not really playing. But the approach has implications for more than just children's games. Basic interpersonal interaction, while trivially easy for a human being, is notoriously difficult for a robot; to complete a handshake the robot must simultaneously move its own arm, observe the human's arm, and modify its movements in response to those observations. While this study's sort of rock-means-paper response is of course very simple, it is a proof of concept for real-time robot response to human movement. This also applies to movement assistance, such as military and industrial exoskeletons, which look to identify and help with the user's movements. Rock Paper Scissors is sometimes known as “Janken,†which gave the robot its super-creative name: “The Janken (Rock Paper Scissors) Robot.†Rock Paper Scissors has actually fascinated roboticists for some time; last year, researchersfigured out that there are broadly reliable patterns in human RPS behavior, giving their robot an advantage through sheer insight into how humans play the game. In that case, a robot was able to learn and exploit the statistical oddities of how humans non-randomly select their next play, gaining an advantage in the aggregate. This newer cheating approach shows how robotic abilities offer avenues around traditional problems, often with far more impressive results. It is telling, though, that to increase the response time a less and less real-world scenario was required. With the use of specialized backgrounds and lighting conditions, everything has to be just right for the robot to be able to correctly interpret the early movements of a human hand and arm. It shows how very hard it is going to be, to bring robots into the everyday. The ability to beat people at RPS basically boils down to the ability to see and react to movement fast enough to fool human perception - that's a very important threshold. This isn't really there, just yet. As mentioned, the conditions have to be just right for its latency to get this low, and the rig is quite expensive. But with high-speed cameras and an ever-improving ability to let robots actually interpret what they see, we may not be far from a future with real robot integration into everyday life.
Nanobots: The rise of the molecular machines Nanomachines - including nano-sized motors, rockets and even cars - are many orders of magnitude smaller than a human cell, but they have huge promise. In the future, they could deliver drugs anywhere in the body, clean up oil spills and might even be used as artificial muscle cells. Find out more about these molecular machines (and the challenges that nanobot researchers still face) in Reactions' latest video, produced in collaboration with the University of Nebraska's SciPop series. - American Chemical Society